After the debates fundamental change

[ltr]After the debates fundamental change[/ltr]

 Since 02/24/2016 15:15 (Baghdad time)
[ltr][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/ltr]
[ltr]Abdel Halim Alraheema[/ltr]
[ltr]Since the Prime Minister, Mr. Haider al-Abadi fired call, or his decision to conduct «reshuffle substantially» and controversies widen and intensify between the political forces and blocs, both among themselves, or between them and Abadi, the owner of an invitation to change, this as well as the role of the media, both in contributing to these debates or to transfer to public opinion.These debates have consisted duality is not without wit, about the concepts and mechanisms and shape change. It is this duality, you change materially or destruction? Does this would be partly reshuffle or for the entire ministerial cabin? Does technocrat professionals only, or will be Minister will be political as well ?, Do you choose Abadi and its Committee of Ministers of the new ministers, or will be done in coordination and understanding with the Commission parliamentary posed ?, parliament does exceed the change known as quotas partisan, political, or would range place known formula or inventing verbal formulas remain on the content and conduct an amendment in form and wording is not is? .. and so forth of the binaries and the ideas and suggestions expressed by these controversies.[/ltr]
[ltr]In the midst of these controversies unfinished, Parliament hosted the prime minister to explain to its members, and the public, what does it mean a fundamental change - and here agreed Abadi opinion developed this concept to the concept of sweeping change - and what they requested from the parliament, as well as what he wants Parliament of it ... and to other ideas and proposals, where select Abadi in his speech to parliament, and his answers to questions from members, he asked parliament to (give him a mandate years to form a professional government and jurisdiction away from the factional and partisan) then called the parliamentary blocs to (waive electoral maturity and the Government of the points for interest Graduate of the country). At the end of host Mr. Abadi had not been demonstrated clearly yet whether to grant authorization to the parliament a new year or rejection of this application, where different views about that between exile and between saying that a mandate has been given to the servants but orally !.[/ltr]
[ltr]The important question is: What happens after these debates and dialogues political movement broad parliamentary blocs and the general forces and political figures concerned ?, Do you agree or conform all, or the majority, specific and sophisticated formula actually not only the ministerial change, but also for a change in the political process and fix it?[/ltr]
[ltr]There is no doubt that the conflict between those who want reform and change the overall fundamental, ie according to the invitation and proposals Abadi, and between those who want the cavity and obstruction call for change, the announcement of the approval of this change, but with the development of requirements prohibitive, ie put sticks in advance at the wheel of change required. And, of course, that the month's parliamentary blocs agreed to give to Ebadi to submit his cabinet will be difficult and complex have been lengthened more than that. Because Abadi had heard and continued all or most of the debates that took place about the change, he must have been realized and absorbed orientation key, especially orientation most obvious view that does not change and real reform if it does not exceed the quota partisan and political, and did not exceed the impossible conditions for some of the blocks that want to the situation remains as it is without real change.[/ltr]
[ltr]Therefore, Mr. Abadi identified accurately and in front of the parliament, that change must be based on professional competence, but must go beyond and discard factional and partisan, called blocs to (waive electoral maturity and the Government of the points).[/ltr]
[ltr]That stuck to the Prime Minister the right to see him this to change and reform will open the way - if achieved - in front of a fundamental and comprehensive change in the political process and the joints of the state and its institutions, which Trhilt and unable to perform its functions properly, the managed-Abadi achieve that will report to him as a success enjoys broad public support , though it was unable to due to severe Aerqlat Vchristsp it, and thus dissipate the winds yellow Aerqlat winds of change that contribute to save Iraq, which is in it.[/ltr]


[ltr][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[/ltr]