The US presence in Iraq is a mass threat, a state ambiguity and political differences

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


The US presence in Iraq is a mass threat, a state ambiguity and political differences


Meanwhile, Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi revealed a government plan to gradually reduce the number of coalition forces. Spokesman for the US Defense Department, Adrian Rankin Galloway, said that the international coalition will continue its presence in coordination with the Iraqi government in accordance with the evolving situation on the ground. 
The political blocs varied in their positions, the cold with the survival of US and national forces led by Allawi also on terms, while Maliki's coalition rejected it and committed the year neutrality.
Opposition to the US presence came at the same time as the "naïve" position, along with a similar position to two other factions demanding a full withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, opposing the Baghdad and Washington plans to keep part of the troops for training and advice. 
Bader, led by Hadi al-Amiri, said any US troops would remain "a source of unrest." 
"There must be coordination between the two governments for a complete withdrawal, not for survival, because survival would expose the country to internal division and be a magnet for terrorism," spokesman Badr Karim Nuri said. 
While the Hezbollah Brigades reiterated its threat to "attack US forces," according to its spokesman Ja'far al-Husseini, who confirmed that "we are serious in the process of getting the Americans out by force of arms, because the Americans only understand this language."
Politically, deputies warned of a coalition of state law - led by Nuri al-Maliki, the direction of the United States, for the implementation of projects they described as «Zionist - American», demanding Abadi statement why the US forces remain in Iraq until now after the liberation of the country from the organization «state». 
MP Mansour al-Baiji said in a statement that «the Iraqi government should not live in the circle of embarrassment of the survival of US forces, and it must make clear to the Iraqis how many numbers of these forces, and when will be taken out, and what is its role, and the reason to stay so far on our territory after the declaration of victory over Terrorist gangs. " 
He added: «Talk about the presence of US advisers is to mix the papers and cover the survival of these forces, if they were advisers what is the reason for the presence of military carriers, tanks and aircraft and these large numbers of soldiers. What is their role? "
"Everyone knows that President Trump's policy is not an end to their existence, so we have to get these American forces out as soon as possible," he said. "We do not need those forces. The government has to act and not to remain silent because this is very dangerous. The delay is likely. " 
While MP Mohammed al-Chihod said that «Iraq has proved its ability to stand against terrorism and does not need the presence of US forces on its territory». 
"The Pentagon's decision to keep US forces in Iraq for a post-Saddam era confirms the continuation of the Zionist-American conspiracy project targeting Iraq and the people, and therefore America, which made Al-Qaeda and Al-Ansar and is likely to be planning to coordinate with internal and external political forces to manufacture a terrorist organization New, and create the appropriate ground for him in western Iraq and eastern Syria ».


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]