Home
[size=32]Iran-Saudi crisis after Aramco attacks and possible escalation
- 45 Minutes Have Passed
[/size]
[/size]
Saudi Aramco's facilities were hit by missiles and drones on Saturday, September 14, 2019, disrupting half of Saudi oil production. Despite the Houthis' adoption of these attacks, Washington and Riyadh have accused Iran of being behind them, because of the location of the site from Yemen, and the complexity of the implementation, and that it came from northwestern Saudi Arabia. The Kingdom and the United States face a dilemma in how to respond to this escalation. The possibilities range from simply tightening sanctions on Iran to an increased US military presence in the region, leading to a limited military response, whether in Iran's spheres of influence in Syria or Iraq, or even within Iran itself, although this latter possibility appears to be weak.
Determinants of US behavior in the crisis with Iran
A set of considerations in the administration of President Donald Trump's policy regarding the gradual escalation of Iran, the most important of which is the president's position of refusing to engage in any new war that is not directly related to American interests, is based on his administration's "national security strategy," based on his campaign slogan. “America First”. During his 2016 election campaign, Trump has pledged to withdraw US troops from many conflict areas in the world, particularly from the Middle East, but has had little success in this regard. He even found himself forced to send more troops to Afghanistan, for example, in 2017, as well as deploying additional troops in the Persian Gulf in May and July 2019, in an effort to deter Iran from carrying out attacks that threaten freedom of navigation in the region.
But Trump does not want to look like the president's weak face to Iran, especially since he did not
"Trump refuses to get involved in any new war that is not directly related to American interests," he is reluctant to accuse former US presidents of having "lost faith in American greatness." Obama has often called for weak and reluctant policies in the world, making America's opponents dare. Trump finds himself embarrassed by the hawks of the Republicans and his allies in Israel and Saudi Arabia.He has made significant threats against Iran, but is now begging for a dialogue with it under the sanctions he reimposed after he unilaterally withdrew from the nuclear deal in 2018, which Iran understands is a surrender of abolition. Agreement and subject to sanctions. This behavior has greatly weakened the image Trump tried to establish for himself, as a “big deal maker” from a position of strength. Iran has also increased its challenge to Trump, and instead of bowing to sanctions and returning to the negotiating table, it is gradually escalating to raise the cost to him, forcing him to retreat from his policies towards it.
Saudi Considerations Saudi Arabia
finds itself facing a dilemma no less difficult than the one facing Trump. At the start of the crisis, Saudi Arabia was pushing for a military confrontation between Washington and Tehran in the hope that it would put an end to Iran's expansionist policies in the region. Over time, however, Saudi Arabia began to realize that it could pay a high price in such a confrontation, especially as confidence eroded in the US position, and the Trump administration's reluctance and reluctance to engage in a full-scale military confrontation with Iran became apparent. Recent attacks on Saudi Arabia have increased their vulnerability to threats. Despite large arms deals and Saudi military spending, which ranks third globally after the US and China alone, Saudi Arabia has been largely powerless in the face of air strikes, whether from Yemen or the north.
According to US reports, Saudi suspicions about Trump's intentions to counter the Iranian escalation that targeted it prompted Riyadh to formally ask Washington not to ignite a regional war, of which the kingdom would be the first affected, or its main arena. The Saudi request, leaked by the Trump administration, came through Deputy Defense Minister Prince Khaled bin Salman bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud during his recent visit to Washington in late August 2019. Instead of beating the drums of war, bin Salman asked US officials to continue with the sanctions approach. On the grounds that the U.S.-imposed `` extreme pressures '' economic policy, imposed in August 2018, is effective in undermining the stability of the Tehran regime, which may be involved in a limited war, to divert the attention of the Iranian people from domestic crises to external threats.
Saudi fears of US let-down appear realistic - a series of attacks on oil tankers in the Persian Gulf in May and June 2019 did not generate a US military response. Iran's downing of a U.S. drone in June 2019 - the United States insisted it was flying over the Strait of Hormuz, not in Iranian airspace - did not change the US position. After Washington resolved its decision to launch a retaliatory military strike on Iran, Trump retreated at the last minute; claiming that the rhythm of Iranian deaths is a disproportionate response to the downing of a drone, and instead to launch a "cyber" attack, Trump claimed to have done great damage to Iran's Missile. Finally, the attacks on Aramco's facilities on September 14 unequivocally revealed Trump's inability to engage in a confrontation with Iran as long as it did not directly affect US forces in the region.
Saudi Arabia's image in Washington does not look much better than the image of Iran, which makes it more difficult to defend it if attacked. Riyadh suffers from the shrinking base of its allies in the US Congress that
“Trump finds himself embarrassed by the hawks of the Republicans and his allies in Israel and Saudi Arabia.” Abuses committed in the Yemen war since 2015, prompting Congress to vote by a bipartisan majority in May 2019 on a resolution barring the United States from continuing to support the Saudi-UAE alliance, and Trump has been forced to veto it. Add to this the repercussions of the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who was a US citizen, at his country's consulate in Istanbul in October 2018. Moreover, the human rights file in the kingdom continues to draw widespread criticism in Washington and the world.
Riyadh justifies its intention not to respond directly to the attack, which Iran accuses of launching against Aramco's oil facilities by coordinating with Washington and obtaining its approval. The United States has hundreds of troops stationed in Saudi Arabia and has thousands more deployed in bases and military parts in the Gulf. This makes them vulnerable to retaliatory attacks from Iran. This makes the decision to respond to Iran practically in the hands of the United States, the Saudis say, although US officials assert that Washington has sold Riyadh many sophisticated weapons that would enable it to respond to the Iranian attack, if it really wants to.
Based on these considerations, the US Treasury announcement on September 20, 2019, to impose further sanctions on Tehran, followed by the Pentagon's announcement of reinforcing its forces and air and missile defense equipment in the region in response to the Aramco attack, may be The best that Washington and Riyadh want to do at the current stage, in the hope that Iran will stop taking further escalation.
Background Washington's reluctance in the face of Iranian escalation
There are important factors pushing the US administration, especially the Pentagon, to deal with great caution in the crisis with Iran, the most important of which: the
fear that any limited strike on Iran would spark a full-scale war in the region, involving it
“Saudi fears of American betrayal are realistically justified” by the United States along with its allies. In a limited strike, Iran is likely to use its proxy network stretching from Yemen to Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, which could jeopardize US bases, military parts and interests. If that happens, the United States will find itself forced to mobilize a large military force to defeat Iran; which means a new war in the Middle East, and enter a scenario worse than the scenario of Iraq.
The administration also fears that it might serve the hard-line in Iran if it is hit by a military strike. It could eliminate any chances to re-negotiate the Iranian nuclear deal.
According to the American intelligence community's assessment, the Iranian regime, which is suffering from a decline in its popularity due to the impact of economic sanctions, seeks to entice the United States to a limited military attack, to increase its popularity internally, and strengthen its strategic position externally, and therefore the Trump administration does not want to give this paper .
Conclusion
Regardless of the circumstantial considerations that govern US behavior in response to the Iranian escalation, the recent crisis has exposed a profound change in the US approach to Gulf security and the limits of its commitment to it. This change did not begin with the Trump administration, but the Obama administration established it; On the other hand, the US is becoming less dependent on Gulf oil today, producing 12 million barrels of oil per day, and buying only 9% of Saudi oil imports from abroad. This does not mean that the Gulf region has completely lost its importance to the United States. It remains a major source of oil and gas in the world, affecting the stability of energy prices globally and thus the stability of the global economy. The United States is unlikely to allow rival international powers such as Russia and China to take its place in the Persian Gulf, but this region is no longer as important as it once was when Washington imported a large part of its oil. Finally, US allies in the Gulf region, especially Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, failed to bet on President Trump, believing that he would fundamentally change Obama's policies. All that has changed for them, as they rush to normalize with Israel to gain his satisfaction, is his constant demand for them to pay for protection, without a real translation on the ground. Finally, US allies in the Gulf region, especially Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, failed to bet on President Trump, believing that he would fundamentally change Obama's policies. All that has changed for them, as they rush to normalize with Israel to gain his satisfaction, is his constant demand for them to pay for protection, without a real translation on the ground. Finally, US allies in the Gulf region, especially Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, failed to bet on President Trump, believing that he would fundamentally change Obama's policies. All that has changed for them, as they rush to normalize with Israel to gain his satisfaction, is his constant demand for them to pay for protection, without a real translation on the ground.
Determinants of US behavior in the crisis with Iran
A set of considerations in the administration of President Donald Trump's policy regarding the gradual escalation of Iran, the most important of which is the president's position of refusing to engage in any new war that is not directly related to American interests, is based on his administration's "national security strategy," based on his campaign slogan. “America First”. During his 2016 election campaign, Trump has pledged to withdraw US troops from many conflict areas in the world, particularly from the Middle East, but has had little success in this regard. He even found himself forced to send more troops to Afghanistan, for example, in 2017, as well as deploying additional troops in the Persian Gulf in May and July 2019, in an effort to deter Iran from carrying out attacks that threaten freedom of navigation in the region.
But Trump does not want to look like the president's weak face to Iran, especially since he did not
"Trump refuses to get involved in any new war that is not directly related to American interests," he is reluctant to accuse former US presidents of having "lost faith in American greatness." Obama has often called for weak and reluctant policies in the world, making America's opponents dare. Trump finds himself embarrassed by the hawks of the Republicans and his allies in Israel and Saudi Arabia.He has made significant threats against Iran, but is now begging for a dialogue with it under the sanctions he reimposed after he unilaterally withdrew from the nuclear deal in 2018, which Iran understands is a surrender of abolition. Agreement and subject to sanctions. This behavior has greatly weakened the image Trump tried to establish for himself, as a “big deal maker” from a position of strength. Iran has also increased its challenge to Trump, and instead of bowing to sanctions and returning to the negotiating table, it is gradually escalating to raise the cost to him, forcing him to retreat from his policies towards it.
Saudi Considerations Saudi Arabia
finds itself facing a dilemma no less difficult than the one facing Trump. At the start of the crisis, Saudi Arabia was pushing for a military confrontation between Washington and Tehran in the hope that it would put an end to Iran's expansionist policies in the region. Over time, however, Saudi Arabia began to realize that it could pay a high price in such a confrontation, especially as confidence eroded in the US position, and the Trump administration's reluctance and reluctance to engage in a full-scale military confrontation with Iran became apparent. Recent attacks on Saudi Arabia have increased their vulnerability to threats. Despite large arms deals and Saudi military spending, which ranks third globally after the US and China alone, Saudi Arabia has been largely powerless in the face of air strikes, whether from Yemen or the north.
According to US reports, Saudi suspicions about Trump's intentions to counter the Iranian escalation that targeted it prompted Riyadh to formally ask Washington not to ignite a regional war, of which the kingdom would be the first affected, or its main arena. The Saudi request, leaked by the Trump administration, came through Deputy Defense Minister Prince Khaled bin Salman bin Abdul Aziz al-Saud during his recent visit to Washington in late August 2019. Instead of beating the drums of war, bin Salman asked US officials to continue with the sanctions approach. On the grounds that the U.S.-imposed `` extreme pressures '' economic policy, imposed in August 2018, is effective in undermining the stability of the Tehran regime, which may be involved in a limited war, to divert the attention of the Iranian people from domestic crises to external threats.
Saudi fears of US let-down appear realistic - a series of attacks on oil tankers in the Persian Gulf in May and June 2019 did not generate a US military response. Iran's downing of a U.S. drone in June 2019 - the United States insisted it was flying over the Strait of Hormuz, not in Iranian airspace - did not change the US position. After Washington resolved its decision to launch a retaliatory military strike on Iran, Trump retreated at the last minute; claiming that the rhythm of Iranian deaths is a disproportionate response to the downing of a drone, and instead to launch a "cyber" attack, Trump claimed to have done great damage to Iran's Missile. Finally, the attacks on Aramco's facilities on September 14 unequivocally revealed Trump's inability to engage in a confrontation with Iran as long as it did not directly affect US forces in the region.
Saudi Arabia's image in Washington does not look much better than the image of Iran, which makes it more difficult to defend it if attacked. Riyadh suffers from the shrinking base of its allies in the US Congress that
“Trump finds himself embarrassed by the hawks of the Republicans and his allies in Israel and Saudi Arabia.” Abuses committed in the Yemen war since 2015, prompting Congress to vote by a bipartisan majority in May 2019 on a resolution barring the United States from continuing to support the Saudi-UAE alliance, and Trump has been forced to veto it. Add to this the repercussions of the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, who was a US citizen, at his country's consulate in Istanbul in October 2018. Moreover, the human rights file in the kingdom continues to draw widespread criticism in Washington and the world.
Riyadh justifies its intention not to respond directly to the attack, which Iran accuses of launching against Aramco's oil facilities by coordinating with Washington and obtaining its approval. The United States has hundreds of troops stationed in Saudi Arabia and has thousands more deployed in bases and military parts in the Gulf. This makes them vulnerable to retaliatory attacks from Iran. This makes the decision to respond to Iran practically in the hands of the United States, the Saudis say, although US officials assert that Washington has sold Riyadh many sophisticated weapons that would enable it to respond to the Iranian attack, if it really wants to.
Based on these considerations, the US Treasury announcement on September 20, 2019, to impose further sanctions on Tehran, followed by the Pentagon's announcement of reinforcing its forces and air and missile defense equipment in the region in response to the Aramco attack, may be The best that Washington and Riyadh want to do at the current stage, in the hope that Iran will stop taking further escalation.
Background Washington's reluctance in the face of Iranian escalation
There are important factors pushing the US administration, especially the Pentagon, to deal with great caution in the crisis with Iran, the most important of which: the
fear that any limited strike on Iran would spark a full-scale war in the region, involving it
“Saudi fears of American betrayal are realistically justified” by the United States along with its allies. In a limited strike, Iran is likely to use its proxy network stretching from Yemen to Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, which could jeopardize US bases, military parts and interests. If that happens, the United States will find itself forced to mobilize a large military force to defeat Iran; which means a new war in the Middle East, and enter a scenario worse than the scenario of Iraq.
The administration also fears that it might serve the hard-line in Iran if it is hit by a military strike. It could eliminate any chances to re-negotiate the Iranian nuclear deal.
According to the American intelligence community's assessment, the Iranian regime, which is suffering from a decline in its popularity due to the impact of economic sanctions, seeks to entice the United States to a limited military attack, to increase its popularity internally, and strengthen its strategic position externally, and therefore the Trump administration does not want to give this paper .
Conclusion
Regardless of the circumstantial considerations that govern US behavior in response to the Iranian escalation, the recent crisis has exposed a profound change in the US approach to Gulf security and the limits of its commitment to it. This change did not begin with the Trump administration, but the Obama administration established it; On the other hand, the US is becoming less dependent on Gulf oil today, producing 12 million barrels of oil per day, and buying only 9% of Saudi oil imports from abroad. This does not mean that the Gulf region has completely lost its importance to the United States. It remains a major source of oil and gas in the world, affecting the stability of energy prices globally and thus the stability of the global economy. The United States is unlikely to allow rival international powers such as Russia and China to take its place in the Persian Gulf, but this region is no longer as important as it once was when Washington imported a large part of its oil. Finally, US allies in the Gulf region, especially Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, failed to bet on President Trump, believing that he would fundamentally change Obama's policies. All that has changed for them, as they rush to normalize with Israel to gain his satisfaction, is his constant demand for them to pay for protection, without a real translation on the ground. Finally, US allies in the Gulf region, especially Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, failed to bet on President Trump, believing that he would fundamentally change Obama's policies. All that has changed for them, as they rush to normalize with Israel to gain his satisfaction, is his constant demand for them to pay for protection, without a real translation on the ground. Finally, US allies in the Gulf region, especially Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, failed to bet on President Trump, believing that he would fundamentally change Obama's policies. All that has changed for them, as they rush to normalize with Israel to gain his satisfaction, is his constant demand for them to pay for protection, without a real translation on the ground.
» utube 11/13/24 MM&C MM&C News-Private Sector- Electronic Payments-Reconstruction-Development-Digit
» utube MM&C 11/15/24 Update-Budget-Non Oil Resources-CBI-USFED-Cross Border Transfers-Oil
» Al-Sudani is besieged by lawsuits over the “wiretapping network”... and Al-Maliki heard “inappropria
» Tens of thousands of foreigners work illegally in Basra... and the departments will bear the respons
» 4 reasons for the Sudanese government’s silence in the face of the factions’ attacks.. Will Baghdad
» PM's advisor: Government able to increase spending without inflation or fiscal deficit
» Prime Minister stresses the need to complete 2024 projects before the end
» Minister of Labor sets date for launching second batch of social protection beneficiaries in the pol
» Al-Sudani approves 35 new service projects, stresses the need to complete 2024 projects
» Minister of Labor: The population census will provide accurate calculations of poor families covered
» Electricity announces its readiness for the winter peak
» Economist: Parallel market remains pivotal to financing Iraq’s trade with Iran, Syria
» Trump: Iraq: A subsidiary or the focus of major deals?
» Counselor Mazhar Saleh: The government is able to increase spending without causing inflation or a f
» Al-Sudani's advisor to "Al-Maalouma": We do not need to bring in foreign workers
» Parliamentary Rejection.. Parliamentarian Talks About Jordanian Agreement That Harms Iraq’s Economy
» Al-Sudani chairs the periodic meeting of the service and engineering effort team
» Al-Sahaf: Washington continues to support terrorist organizations in Iraq
» Al-Maliki Coalition: America is trying to make Iraq hostile to its neighbors by violating its airspa
» Close source: Al-Sudani failed to convince Al-Hakim and Al-Amiri to carry out the ministerial reshuf
» Al-Sayhoud on Postponing Parliament Sessions: Bad Start for Al-Mashhadani
» Peshmerga Minister: The survival of the Kurdistan Region depends on the presence of a strong Peshmer
» Al-Maliki Coalition: US pressures prevent Israel from striking Iraq
» Nechirvan Barzani calls for keeping Peshmerga out of partisan conflicts, urges formation of 'strong
» US Institute: Trump administration may prevent Iraq from importing Iranian gas as part of pressure o
» The meter will visit families again.. Planning details the steps for conducting the population censu
» Government clarification: Is Iraq able to increase spending?
» Iraq advances over China.. Iran's trade exchange witnesses growth during October
» Al-Sudani approves 35 new service projects and begins implementing them within 10 days
» Al-Sudani and Al-Hakim discuss developments in the political scene and the results of the visit to K
» Minister of Labor: Government measures contributed to reducing the poverty rate from 22% to 16.5%
» Al-Maliki calls for strengthening national dialogue and unity to overcome the current stage
» Al-Sudani stresses the importance of accuracy and specifications in service and engineering projects
» Baghdad Governor: 169 projects are listed for referral and contracting
» Industry confirms success by signing 4 investment contracts for strategic industries
» Parliament confirms its support for conducting the general population census and decides to resume s
» Parliament gains a "holiday and a half"... Half of the "extended" legislative term passes without se
» Find out the exchange rates of the dollar against the dinar in the Iraqi stock exchanges
» Al-Maliki describes tribes as a "pillar" for confronting challenges in Iraq
» The plan in the "distribution method".. A representative describes the "investment achievement" as n
» Iraq is ahead of China in trade exchange with Iran.. These are the numbers
» MM&C 11/14/24 Central Bank Governor Urges Türkiye to Open Accounts for Iraqi Banks
» MM&C 11/14/24 Trump and the Iraqi Banks Puzzle
» New decline in gold in Iraq.. and globally records the worst week in 3 years
» Monitoring body approves 2023 imports annual report
» Development Road: Faw Port Ignites Regional Corridor Race
» First in Iraq... Diyala sets a plan for "rural reconstruction"
» Al-Saadi: Influential parties are working to erase the theft of the century file
» MP: Baghdad supports the "Diyala Artery" project with 40 billion dinars
» Source: General amnesty law will pave the way for the return of terrorist groups
» The Prime Minister stresses the need to expedite the completion of the requirements for restructurin
» Minister of Resources: The project to develop the left side of the Tigris River has reached its fina
» Foreign Minister: We are proceeding with implementing the associated gas exploitation program
» Swiss Ambassador Expresses His Country's Desire to Invest in Iraq
» "We left the camel and its load" .. Moroccan farmers await "imminent compensation" from Iraq
» OPEC sues Iraqi minister over oil violations.. What is Kurdistan's involvement?
» Iraq warns of 'dire consequences' of imposing barriers to plastic products
» Iranian newspaper: Iraq's development path is a step towards regional economic integration
» Al-Mandlawi discusses with the Russian ambassador developing relations in the fields of economy, inv
» Oil Minister discusses with Dutch Ambassador strengthening bilateral relations
» The Minister of Oil discusses with the companies "+dss" and "Xergy", joint cooperation to develop th
» Rafidain Bank announces a plan to include other branches in the implementation of the comprehensive
» With the presence of the opposition... Baghdad supports the partnership government in Kurdistan
» Parliamentary move to raise retirement age in state institutions to 63 years
» Through leaks.. Warnings against creating political crises as parliamentary elections approach
» Iraqi oil returns to decline in global markets
» Parliamentary Committee: Iraq uses its international relations to avert the dangers of war from its
» The value of non-oil imports for Sulaymaniyah and Halabja governorates during a week
» Rafidain: Continuous expansion in implementing the comprehensive banking system
» Planning: The population census includes residents of Iraq according to a special mechanism
» Transparency website reveals non-oil imports to Sulaymaniyah and Halabja during a week
» Al-Sudani directs the adoption of specialized international companies to prepare a unified structure
» MP warns of a move that will worsen the housing crisis and calls on the government
» Disagreements strike the Kurdish house... hindering the formation of the regional parliament and gov
» Hundreds of Moroccan farmers are waiting for “imminent compensation” from Iraq.. What’s the story?
» Iraq 10-Year Review: Spending, Imports, Unemployment in 2024 at ‘Highest Level’ in a Decade
» Call to all smokers in Iraq: Prepare for the law
» utube 11/11/24 MM&C News Reporting-IRAQ-USA-Financial Inclusion up 48%-Money Inside & Out of Iraq
» Al-Mandlawi to the UN envoy: The supreme authority diagnosed the problems and provided solutions for
» Saleh: Government strategy to boost gold reserves as part of asset diversification
» Prime Minister's advisor rules out oil price collapse: Trump's policy will not sacrifice petrodollar
» Tripartite alliance between Iraq, Egypt and Jordan to boost maritime trade
» Parliamentary Committee reveals date of entry into force of Personal Status Law
» Al-Fatah warns against US blackmail and Trump's intentions for the next stage
» A leader in the law: If the Americans do not leave on their own two feet, we will expel them in fune
» MP: Next Sunday's session will witness the passing of "important laws"
» There is a financial aspect.. Al-Zaidi rules out voting on the real estate law
» "Promising" economic opportunities in central Iraq open doors to investment, trade and unemployment
» Minister of Transport: Arab interest in the development road project
» Bitcoin Fails to Maintain Its Meteoric Rise
» Amending the retirement age on the parliament's table.. This is the latest that has been reached
» Launching the Health Unit Initiative in Iraqi Schools
» Will Iraq be the savior of the countries of the region if oil prices fall?
» Regarding electrical energy.. Government moves to meet the needs of next summer
» {Retirement age} sparks debate in parliament
» Minister of Transport to {Sabah}: Arab interest in the development road project
» Planning: Two important pre-census activities start today and tomorrow
» Next week.. contracting with 2500 applicants on a {contract} basis