Iraq after al-Maliki

The departure of Nuri al-Maliki as such convulsive of prime minister in Iraq reminds us of many of the cases out of the dramatic political leaders are not receiving adequate unpopular. The fact that his departure was not premature in any case, given all the current troubles faced by his country, which carried a large section of Iraqis Responsibility for them. 
Al-Maliki, according to this view, causing the controversy and discord in a never-ending, and was motivated by a despotic tendencies, and he lacks the political skills of primary and unable to lead the army in a state of chaos. But the greatest failures was represented in its inability to grasp the fact that the referee was successful in Iraq requires communication with other communities, most notably the Sunnis and Kurds. But instead of al-Maliki ordered a pre-emptive arrests of young men of the year in anticipation of fleeing to terrorist groups, and later his political opponents to end their expulsion from the government in some cases (and in one case to exile). 
There is no doubt that a lot of this narrative has a basis in fact. But if this is the whole story, the task of Prime Minister-designate Haider al-Abadi, who was educated in the West and which is characterized by gentleness of creation was to become easy to get things back to the same old. Sunni Iraqis have every reason to support Abadi now after the departure of al-Maliki. 
Indeed, the task that awaits Abadi heavy and arduous. The collapse of Iraq is not due to the failure of al-Maliki in communication with the Sunni minority, which constitutes 20% of the country's population, but there is also a failure of the year in the embrace of the state expresses its Shiite majority. 
The regulation "Daash", which is the most obvious example, did not arise as a result of the failure to communicate with al-Maliki in the year. There is little evidence to indicate that the organization "Daash" show minimal interest in communion with any Shi'ite leader, despite the ambiguity of the organization "Daash", the position of this point clear without any ambiguity. 
Although a large number of leaders of the organization "Daash" Iraqis and elements, this group has emerged as a good funding and arming during the civil war in Syria. But the organization "Daash" not satisfied remove the power there, but was aimed at any challenge to his authority as a true representative of the Year in the Levant and beyond. Consequently, attacked elements associated with other Islamic parties, and Salafis Egyptians, and the Free Syrian Army, fiercely so intense that the Syrian army leave sometimes it does its tasks. 
The organization "Daash", in the same way like many similar groups before him, may disappear in the desert, and leaves behind him only the families of his victims regurgitate the memory of the crimes committed. 
Now is the time to talk and work all the people of Iraq with greater clarity and consistency in the face of this existential threat to civilization in the cradle of civilization. To begin with, it is necessary to stop the aid received by the organization "Daash," In the period from 2005 to 0.2008 shares of preventing foreign fighters and aid from reaching the al-Qaeda in Iraq (the predecessor organization of the Islamic State) in the suppression of the Sunni insurgency to a large extent. 
It also requires agreement on the solution results in neutralizing the organization "Daash" to enable to move forward in Syria. It must be a multi-dimensional solution, and will most likely include air strikes against al "Daash" in Syria itself, a possibility that does not aspire to one. 
But Syria will not settle air strikes alone. We must renew diplomatic efforts by building consensus among foreign powers first, and then between the warring parties around the body that Syria would look like in the future. Will turn into a federal republic? Or a system based on provinces? Or maybe should include its new bicameral parliament, with the Senate on a sectarian basis and has the right of veto against laws that may Istnha the House of Representatives. 
The formulation of future political arrangements in Syria, as far as looks far-fetched today, is perhaps the best way to help the beleaguered moderate opposition in the country and expose the naysayers. It should not be for President Bashar al-Assad to be part of the future of Syria, but this issue can be deferred for the time being to be the establishment of good communication channels with his supporters and others who continue fighting in the recipe. 
There are those who will say that this should have been two years ago. But we should not be attributed ourselves to do it late is better than not doing it at all. Given the momentum of the civil war, the Syrian and complexity, it seems likely to continue fighting for two years from now, when viewed without a doubt some back and says that some of the other tracks had to be Khmntm behavior as two years ago

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]