Federal Supreme Court rejects new appeals against the tripartite budget

[ltr]twilight News / The Federal Supreme Court decided on Monday to dismiss some appeals in form related to The unconstitutionality of articles in the budget law.[/ltr]







[ltr]The The court in a statement received by Shafaq News Agency, that it ruled to dismiss the plaintiffs' lawsuit in form in Cases No. (175/ Federal/2023), (170/Federal/2023) and (169/Federal/2023) And (165/ Federal/ 2023), (154/ Federal/ 2023) and (166/ Federal/ 2023), private challenging the constitutionality of some articles of Law No. 13 of 2023, General Budget Law Federal Republic of Iraq for the fiscal years 2023 – 2024 – 2025.[/ltr]




[ltr]She showed The judgment was dismissed based on the provisions of Article 22 of the Rules of Procedure No. 1 of 2022 In terms of Article 19 thereof, the plaintiffs are not among the persons mentioned in the above article. Male who have the right to challenge the constitutionality of the budget law and charge them expenses and fees And attorney's fees, and the rulings were issued by agreement definitively and binding on all authorities and understand publicly On 7/8/2023.[/ltr]




[ltr]Loyal Earlier today, the Federal Supreme Court announced the resolution of the Kurdistan Regional Government's appeal by the Budget Law.[/ltr]




[ltr]said Informing the Federal Supreme Court, in a statement received by Shafaq News Agency, that the court considered This day in the lawsuit numbered (168/Federal/2023) filed before it by the plaintiff (President Kurdistan Regional Government / Add to his Job) against the defendant (Speaker of the House of Representatives/ Addendum for his job) to challenge articles of Law No. 13 of 2023 (General Budget Federal Republic of Iraq for the fiscal years 2023, 2024, 2025).[/ltr]




[ltr]He added The statement that the Supreme Court issued its final and binding decision to all authorities, including the ruling The unconstitutionality of the phrase (and with the approval of the Federal Prime Minister) contained in Article (11/I) and the phrase (in the event that it is not possible to dissolve the House of Representatives, take the necessary decision) contained In Article (13/VII) of the Law.[/ltr]




[ltr]And spent, The Court, dismissing the lawsuit regarding the challenge to the constitutionality of Articles (2/I/5/b) and (11/II) and (12/II/A, B, C, D, E) and (13/VIII/B) of the Law.[/ltr]




[ltr]as The Federal Supreme Court announced the resolution of the federal government's challenge to the budget law.[/ltr]




[ltr]said Informing her in another separate statement, that the Federal Supreme Court considered this day the lawsuit Numbered (153/Federal/2023) filed before it by the plaintiff (Prime Minister/ Addendum for his job) against the defendant (Speaker of the House of Representatives / in addition to his job) for challenging articles of Law No. (13) of 2023 ((Federal General Budget of the Republic of Iraq)) For the fiscal years (2023, 2024, 2025).[/ltr]




[ltr]The Its final and binding decision to all authorities, including the ruling that the phrase (exclusively) is unconstitutional Contained in Article (2/I/8/ c/6), and the phrase (at his request) in the section The last of Article (16/II), Article (20/VI), and Article (28/IV/A), Article (57/I/C), Article (70/II), and Article (72) of Law No. (13) For the year 2023 ((the federal general budget of the Republic of Iraq for the fiscal years (2023), 2024، 2025)).[/ltr]




[ltr]as The decision included a ruling to dismiss the plaintiff's lawsuit regarding the challenge to the constitutionality of Articles (28/IV/b). and (62/IV), (63/III), (65/II), (71) and (75) of the above law.[/ltr]



[ltr][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.][/ltr]