Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    In Iraq and Lebanon...weapons are more important than elections

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 269703
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    In Iraq and Lebanon...weapons are more important than elections Empty In Iraq and Lebanon...weapons are more important than elections

    Post by Rocky Thu 16 Jun 2022, 7:06 am

    [size=32]In Iraq and Lebanon...weapons are more important than elections[/size]
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] Thursday, June 16, 2022 at 14:33 pm (51 views)
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]FacebookTwitterGoogle plusLinkedinEmail





    Sky Press 

    Good God Good God 

    About eight months after the Iraqi elections, an achievement in itself achieved by Mustafa Al-Kazemi's government, the road is still a political dead end at all levels. The Iraqi political blockage is clearly demonstrated by the inability to form a new government on the one hand and the election of a new president for the republic to succeed Barham Salih on the other.

    Iraq is still no more than an Iranian hostage. He has no role but to be a card in the American-Iranian negotiations, negotiations through which the “Islamic Republic” wants to reach a deal with the American “Great Satan” that guarantees it to play the role of the dominant force in the entire region and to continue its expansion project, which it supervises. Revolutionary Guards” and even obtaining American funding for it.

    The obstruction will continue to dominate the situation in Iraq, given that the US administration, despite all the efforts made by the Iranian lobby in Washington, and despite the sympathy of Rob Malley, who is responsible for the Iranian file in the administration, is unable to reach such a deal. This is due to several reasons, including the strong opposition in both houses of Congress to such an approach that reflects Americans' shortsightedness and naivety... and the objection of the countries of the region, not only Israel, to any surrender in front of Iranian conditions.

    What Iraq is witnessing these days, especially in light of the resignations of the representatives of the largest bloc (the Sadrist bloc), indicates the impossibility of establishing a viable regime under the control of arms over political life. It becomes clear daily that there is no room for any meaningful political life as long as arms have the last word and not the majority in Parliament, which is a majority that includes Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish representatives.

    As in Iraq, as well as in Lebanon, the weapon seems more powerful than the elections. Parliamentary elections in Lebanon have no meaning as long as Hezbollah's weapons allow elections in this region and not in another. Neither the Lebanese people nor the members of the Shiite community who object to the party’s behavior can prevent Hezbollah from obtaining 27 Shiite deputies out of the 27 parliament. All means seem legitimate, from the party's point of view, to secure a monopoly on Shiite representation and impose the laws of the political game in Lebanon.

    There is also no longer any meaning for parliamentary elections in Iraq. No respect whatsoever for the constitution in light of Iran's loss of the elections and the Sadrist bloc's obtaining the largest number of deputies (73 deputies).

    In normal conditions, knowing that conditions in Iraq were never normal, and under the applicable Iraqi constitution, this bloc decides who will form the new government based on the alliances it reaches. This is what actually happened with the establishment of alliances between the Sadrists and a large section of the Sunnis and a major section of the Kurds represented by Massoud Barzani. It is clear that this did not please Iran, which fears a broad alliance that will lead to the formation of a government that enjoys a minimum level of cohesion among its members, capable of confirming that Iraq is Iraq and Iran is Iran.

    Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadr was forced to ask the representatives of his bloc to submit their resignations. He moved to the opposition after he and his allies had a majority in the House of Representatives. It is not known what his next step will be, but it is clear that he wants to vent the overwhelming popular anger and put an end to the farce of the weapons controlling the elections in Iraq.

    In Lebanon and Iraq, the result is the same. There is no political life in a country controlled by weapons, so what if this weapon is a militia and sectarian and affiliated with the Iranian “Revolutionary Guard”, as is the case of “Hezbollah” in Lebanon and the “Popular Mobilization” militia in Iraq?

    There is only one conclusion that can be drawn from the Iraqi and Lebanese cases. This conclusion says that there is no future for a country ruled by sectarian militias affiliated with Iran and other than Iran. All that is required is for Iraq and Lebanon to die in order for the regime in Iran to live and to be able to make a deal with the American administration according to its terms, knowing that this is impossible in the current circumstances for American internal reasons first.

    The most dangerous thing in the matter, with regard to Iraq or with regard to Lebanon, remains that the “Islamic Republic” has nothing to export to the two countries except misery and devastation. In fact, Iran has nothing to export other than these two goods. If it had had another model to export, the regime would have thought about the fate of the Iranian people, more than half of whom are now living below the poverty line.

    Iraq fell, regardless of the previous Baathist regime’s perpetrations, as a result of the US occupation in April-April 2003 and the administration of Bush Jr. handing over the country on a silver platter to the “Islamic Republic” of Iran. Lebanon fell after the assassination of Rafik Hariri on the fourteenth of February 2005, an assassination that is a natural sequel to the fall of Iraq into the hands of Iran. In 2022, neither Iraq nor Lebanon will have a viable regime. There is only the Iranian weapon that controls all the joints of the country. After the recent elections in Lebanon, it was proven that "Hezbollah" has a majority in Parliament. It is true that it is not a comfortable majority, but it is sufficient to prove that Parliament is a seal on the Iranian finger and that weapons have the first and last word in determining the fate of the country. It is certain that Muqtada al-Sadr would not have done what he did had it not been for his feeling of despair and inability to form a new government that enjoys a minimum level of homogeneity. The Iraqi Shiite leader chose the opposition from outside the parliament, ie on the street. Is this an adventure...or is it a prelude to major events awaiting the country, which no longer has solutions to its daily problems, under the rule of relentless sectarian weapons of politics, and not the other way around.

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Wed 08 May 2024, 6:19 pm