Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Maliki's coalition criticized the government's lack of clarity about the US presence in Iraq

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 269703
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Maliki's coalition criticized the government's lack of clarity about the US presence in Iraq Empty Maliki's coalition criticized the government's lack of clarity about the US presence in Iraq

    Post by Rocky Sat 30 Jan 2016, 7:03 am

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    Maliki's coalition criticized the government's lack of clarity about the US presence in Iraq


     Baghdad / term-Presse 

    He criticized the coalition of state law blurred the government placed sending more new US troops to Iraq, while the Supreme Council felt that the presence of US forces is subject to certain consensus and specific functions in accordance with the strategic agreement between the two countries. 
    The Commission on Security and Defence parliamentary says she has not seen a new agreement between the government and Washington over the deployment of foreign troops, welcomes the support of a US-Iraqi forces in the fight against terrorism, provided that they do not re-Ctlal.oukal leader of the coalition of state law, Salah Abdul-Razzaq, in an interview for the (long-Presse) Thursday, said that "the Prime Minister, Haidar Abadi, has long said he will not allow the entry of foreign ground troops to Iraq, and that foreign aid will be limited to air strikes, the international coalition and advisers to train the security forces, "they returned, it is" not clear yet the subject of deployment of new US troops from the 101st Airborne Division in Iraq, as a result Non-government issue a formal statement on them. 
    "He guessed Abdul Razak," The presence of Turkish agreement Kurd US on the presence of troops from the two countries in Iraq, "asking," Where are the Iraqi position, but where the Joint Special Operations Command responsible actually for management of the war. 
    "The Embassy of the United States in Baghdad, denied in (January 21 the current 2016) and the arrival of "a large number" of US military forces to Iraq, while indicated that the coming weeks will see the replacement of the 82nd Airborne Division, counterpart 101 to do the same tasks for the provision of advice and training, as part of the periodic rotation procedures , confirmed that the military activities in the country is done through "consultation and coordination" with Alaracah.lkn government leader of the Supreme Islamic Council, Hamid Maaleh, "I do not believe that US troops alternative Turkish counterpart, as some believe, because the last subject of a separate, especially that Iraq called for the need withdrawal, made ​​a complaint to the Security Council on them. 
    "said Maaleh, in an interview for the (long-Presse) that" the presence of US troops is subject to other consensus related to fighting Daash, "noting that" among those forces specific functions are subject to the agreement of strategic between the two countries, and that its work is in coordination with the Iraqi government. 
    "The al-Abadi told in (26 of January), NATO, Iraq rejected the presence of Turkish troops on its territory, calling on NATO to use its powers to urge Ankara to withdraw its troops, while uncertain of the Secretary-General of NATO, the keenness of the alliance to Iraq's sovereignty. 
    to That, says a member of the Security and Defense Committee in Parliament, Nayef al-Shammari, in an interview for the (long-Presse) that "Iraq has a security agreement with the United States, as the latter constitutes a major part of the international coalition against al Daash terrorist," stressing that "the Commission does not want a new occupation of Iraq, much as you want US troops supporting the security forces its war against terrorism. 
    "Shammari said that" the Commission has not seen a new agreement between the government and Washington, and do not know the details, "adding" even if any such agreement must be things coordination by the government and to respect the sovereignty of Iraq. " In turn, said a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, Rinas Jano, in an interview for the (long-Presse) that "the presence of US forces in northern Iraq is a centrist solutions to solve the problems between Iraq and Turkey, due to fears of liberalization Mosul process," noting that there are "calling for the presence of foreign forces for not imbalance. " 
    He added Jano, that "there are problems between the two neighbors share common interests, such as Iraq and Turkey, it requires the search for compromises to resolve them," noting that "the existence of an agreement between Iraq and the United States for the presence of forces or any other area of Mosul encroached upon by Daash, it is best suited to get out of the crisis between Iraq and Turkey, the solution. " 
    The sources in the Turkish army revealed, in (the fifth of December 2015 the past) for the deployment of some 150 Turkish soldiers in northern Iraq, while indicated that they solved alternative of its forces in City Ba'shiqah near Mosul (405 km north of Baghdad) in more than two years, confirmed that it accompanied by about 25 tanks. 
    confirmed an American magazine on foreign affairs in the (January 25 the current 2016) that Washington is seeking to compensate for the small number of its troops in Iraq with the help of private ones and strengthening the intelligence effort, whether through the march aircraft or sources "secret" located on the ground, as well as cooperation with the Iraqi forces and the Peshmerga, while showed that those forces will be carried out raids and incursions and free hostages and to gather information and the arrest of the leaders (Daash), Iraq and Syria.
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Wed 08 May 2024, 8:32 am