Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Elimination of authorizing the dismissal of the prime minister and his ministers without providing r

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 269703
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Elimination of authorizing the dismissal of the prime minister and his ministers without providing r Empty Elimination of authorizing the dismissal of the prime minister and his ministers without providing r

    Post by Rocky Thu Apr 07, 2016 5:33 am

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    Elimination of authorizing the dismissal of the prime minister and his ministers without providing reasons


     Baghdad / term 

    It opened the Federal Court, yesterday, thedoor to the Prime Minister to change any of his ministers without convincing reasons shall be obligated to provide to Parliament, citing that the Constitution chose all in this thread.She noted the Court, in its decision, that the requirement to provide an alternative to the minister article is from the requirements of the "workflow" inside the cabinet despite the absence of the text of the Constitution about that. 
    But the Legal Committee of the Parliamentary considered the court 's decision as contrary to the Constitution, stressing the need to differentiate between the vote on the sacking of the minister and the vote on theminister swing. 
    he said the court spokesman judge Abdul Sattar Bayrakdar in a statement received (range Press), a copy ofwhich, " the Supreme Federal Court has received an explanatory request about the inadmissibility of the House of Representatives to vote in a single decision issued by agreeing to the dismissal Minister inconjunction with time itself to approve a replacement set, and the potential requirement to state the reason for the dismissal or not . "He added Bayraktar that" the Court held that Article 78 of the Constitution has empowered the Prime Minister and the right of the dismissal of the minister with the consent of the House ofRepresentatives , "noting that" text absolute in the exercise of this right was not required by the stated reasons. " 
    Bayraktar said that" the decision said that the Prime Minister and in accordance with the constitutional text is the direct executive responsible for public policy of the state. " 
    and on the permissibility of the House of Representatives to vote one decision issued by agreeing to thedismissal of the minister combined on the same time approving the irreplaceable, Bayraktar explained that " the court and through the review of the provisions of the Constitution contained in this field do not see thetext precludes the appointment." Judiciary spokesman confirmed that " the Court emphasized that the proper functioning of the Council of Ministers to implement public policy of the State requires that the requirements, which is to be the House 's decision to dismiss the minister in question coupled appointed minister Alternative." 
    The Prime Minister Haider al - Abadi, had delivered, last Thursday, the new government formation to thePresident of the House of Representatives, Saleem al - Jubouri, a closed envelope, while the parliament voted to give confidence to the candidates within ten days. 
    Commenting on the decision of the Federal Court says MP Hassan Turan, a member of the legal committee inparliament, said that "members of parliament at the beginning it must vote on the minister Balacalh after their knowledge of the causes, and then place a new phase is to provide the Minister alternative and this process needs a parliamentary vote last. " 
    he said Turan (range) that" the aim of the requirement to cause dismissal of the Prime Minister is in order toprevent open the door to excessive dictatorship in the future. " 
    confirms the legal committee member , said" a change of ministerial cabin need to take the opinion of thepolitical blocs , "adding that" the imposition of a fait accompli process Atjda useful. " 
    turn MP Mohsen al - Sadoun, the other member of the legal Committee, that" the right of members of the House of Representatives to vote on the dismissal of Ministers, and then vote on the list of the names of thenew ministers that offer by the presidency of the Council of Representatives and after briefing members of the House of Representatives on their resumes. " 
    He added Sadoun that" this process unconstitutional which is no violation of the Federal Court decision is very clear is that the Prime Minister and the reasons for dismissal. "
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Wed May 08, 2024 9:14 am