Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Sadrists: Jamal al-Hakim al-Jubouri and prevent the vote on the Judicial Council Act

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 280892
    Join date : 2012-12-21

    Sadrists: Jamal al-Hakim al-Jubouri and prevent the vote on the Judicial Council Act Empty Sadrists: Jamal al-Hakim al-Jubouri and prevent the vote on the Judicial Council Act

    Post by Rocky Wed 07 Dec 2016, 1:45 am

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    Sadrists: Jamal al-Hakim al-Jubouri and prevent the vote on the Judicial Council Act


     Baghdad / Wael blessing 

    Sadrists open fire on the Islamic Supreme Council leader Ammar al - Hakim, accusing him of stalling , "Judicial Council" law , which was listed on the session last Saturday's agenda. 
    The public disagreement between the two parties is the first of its kind after the receipt of the wise presidency of the National Alliance in September, which was the Sadrists Province and their leader , who continues to direct his criticism of theShiite alliance. 



    Accuses deputy of the Sadrist movement, the Shiite alliance, he stopped the vote on the law , "Judicial Council", with the support of his boss, to pay certain destinations in the task of the judiciary positions. 
    Hakim , in turn , received the mass attributed the request to withdraw the law to get a broader political consensus, and legislation more sedate law. At issue is a few articles of the law, such as determining theposition of Chairman of the Judicial Council, and the relationship of the recent Federal Court. 
    The Federal Court has challenged the Judicial Council Act, in September 2013, which provided for the separation of the Presidency of the Council of the Federal Supreme Court. 
    And it succeeded Iraqi Alliance and the Liberals and Kurdistan, late in 2012, the adoption of the law in spite of the withdrawal of the members of the coalition of state law and threatened to resort to the Federal Court to challenge the legislation, which is then said that the law was "passed without a quorum." 
    And he restored the latter challenged the Chief Justice Medhat al - Mahmoud to office, after receipt of thePresident of the Federal Appellate Court Judge Hassan Ibrahim Humairi position rather than for a brief period. 

    The pressure on al - Jubouri , 
    but does not appear differences has changed a lot from the previous time, the draft of the new law, theauthorities have focused , however , the President of the Judicial Council and give him the presidency discriminatory court as well. 
    He announced the House of Representatives, Sunday, the postponement of the vote on the draft of theSupreme Judicial Council Act, during the meeting , which was intended to vote on the budget of 2017. MP says Awad al - Awadi, a member of the Liberal bloc, said that " the law was not presented for the first time in the vote on the budget session, but display before it was postponed to Sunday. " 
    He said al - Awadi, in connection with the (range) yesterday, said that " the amended law from the previous version came from the Supreme Judicial Council and has been read in parliament for the first time six months ago , " stressing that the blocks and eliminate held discussions before reading the law for a second time amonth ago. 
    When the law finally arrived, to vote (after the first postponement in the session preceding the day of thevote on the budget), al - Awadi , says , " A delegation from the National Alliance went to the parliament speaker Salim al - Jubouri , to ask him to delay." 
    Sadrist lawmaker asserts that "al - Jubouri view the topic to vote courtesy of the National Alliance," although he says that " the rules of procedure of the parliament is not allowed to introduce the draft law is ready to vote to postpone." 85 deputies voted in favor of continuing to vote on the law, compared with 109 deputies voted in favor of postponement. 
    And a member of the Liberal bloc expresses his belief that " the National Alliance did not act alone, but he was driven by the head of the Coalition Ammar al - Hakim." And the reasons for this movement, al - Awadi ,to see " the National Alliance wants to set quotas touches on the law, and the installation of certain figures in the joints of the Judicial Council." 
    The Sadr movement is the only party in the National Alliance , which did not vote in favor of al - Hakim during his election to the presidency of the coalition three months before the session. 
    The Sadrists are boycotting the Shiite alliance sessions, demonstrations since April last year, but was able tore - wise efforts of the Sadrists to the coalition, but a very short time, only to return the dispute to zero. 
    Following the decision to eliminate re - vice - president of the republic to the office, the cleric returned to announce a boycott of the sessions of the National Alliance once again, accusing him of Btsoev demands presented by the 14 versus return. 

    Find compatibility 
    accusations denied by the Sadrist bloc deputy Hakim stressed that the mass of Ataatard strongly on the law, but found that it is better to get the law on " a broader political consensus." 
    MP says Habib Terminal, a spokesman for the bloc citizen, (range) that "Alaaatardhat limited law, relating to the identification Council President Will supervisor of the Federal Court or part of it , " adding that "those Alaaatardhat is not the welfare of an important law of each state." 
    Terminal and see that the postponement of the vote on the law of days or a week is unimportant in exchange for "discreet law agreed upon by everyone." "We believe that it needs more study and remove the fears ofsome parties." 
    But al - Awadi , deputy criticizes " the allegations of the National Alliance," which he describes as "flimsy and unconvincing", noting that "18 members of the Legal Committee are from the National Alliance, and that thelaw was being debated in the Committee six months ago." 

    The dispute over the presidency 
    Among the members of the Parliamentary Legal Committee, two intercept monitor only two members on thewording of the law sent by the government. 
    Confirms MP Hassan Turan, one of the objectors , along with former Justice Minister Hassan al - Shammari he says, that " the parliament rushed in the presentation of the law this time, and could have been postponed until the next legislative term." 
    Sees Tauran said in an interview with the (range) yesterday, he said that " the law is not the last of theurgent laws," pointing out that " the disagreement is on one point relating headed by the Judicial Council." 
    In the opinion of the Legal Committee member , he said "a prime Federal Court of Cassation for thepresidency of the judiciary is unconstitutional," adding that "Article 89 of the Constitution , the Court ofCassation dismissed from the Judicial Council." 
    That article states that "the judiciary Federation, of the Supreme Judicial Council, the Supreme Federal Court, the Federal Cassation Court, the Prosecutor 's Office , the Judiciary Inspection Department and other federal courts that are regulated in accordance with the law." The MP Hassan Turan warns of the danger of"concentration of power , however , one person", and calls that " the President of the Council chooses from among its members through the ballot."
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

      Current date/time is Sun 17 Nov 2024, 12:52 am