Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    American strategy in the Middle East

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 280892
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    American strategy in the Middle East Empty American strategy in the Middle East

    Post by Rocky Fri 19 Feb 2016, 9:16 am

    American strategy in the Middle East

    Friday 19-02-2016 | 3:02:32







    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


    D.ishen Iamedi / regarded America as the most influence on the situation in the Middle East, and more recently after the September 11 military alliances and tactical intelligence with countries held US decision-maker did not imagine an alliance with them before, so as to achieve its strategic goals. It has a broad strategy unswerving, thus maintaining its position as a superpower in the region. Therefore, the American strategy in the Middle East depends on several considerations, namely: -
    - Maintaining its status as a superpower in the region.
    - Secure energy sources and preserve the (oil).
    - Ensure economic ties.
    - Ensuring the sustainability of arms sales.
    - Ensure the safety and security of the state of Israel.
    - Maintaining its alliances in the region, especially with the Gulf countries.
    - Fight to acquire nuclear weapons.
    - Cut the road in front of any rival power to find her influence in the region, even if it was forced to realize that resorting to a military solution.
    The US strategy of flexible strategies capable of change and adjustment when needed, and have global potential in terms of military power, plans pre-emptive, and today leads the world's many and large capabilities, which make it tops all fields from the door of the defense and the preservation of its national security and to work on the transfer of values civilization to the latter countries. But events Alfodhaouih after the regime change in Iraq and what happened then in most Middle Eastern countries, a negative indicator, the last and this became be resolved by political analysts and some of the documents US intelligence and a number of its allies Declassified on that particular subject allowed to organize Daash onto artificially ordered to become a counterweight to the government of Bashar al-Assad, unlike the United States say they instruct on what happened from the failure of the alternative systems to achieve the established situation, in both cases, civil citizen simple as well as a lot of intellectuals hold America responsible for the killing and destruction happening in the region.
    It can be seen as the US military out of Iraq, a historic turning point in the American vision for the application of strategies in the region, and adopted it to supervise and manage crisis situations without the intervention directly by leaving local conflicts take maximum Mdyatea and directed to serve the continuity of control. Through the study of communities of this region and ideas affecting the communities of this region, which is limited only in the national and religious orientations. After the occurrence of the Arab revolutions and exported Islamist groups (advocacy of them armed) and the consequences that followed from total chaos, especially in Syria and Iraq, the region and the entry of other international parties to the political equation in the region, the US was forced to intervene again directly to maintain its interests, which is about to threaten.
    The direct US intervention in the region once again influenced by many factors, including As we enter new international parties as (Russia) in the equations of the region, and the rapprochement with Iran after reaching an agreement on the Iranian nuclear file, in addition to the changes in the relationship between America and Saudi Arabia the apparent disparity of views between the parties about what is happening in Syria and Egypt, may be the first to change US allies in the region (US researcher Stephen Keynes), author of the book reshape the Middle East in 2011, and replaced with new alliances after becoming orientations old allies intersect with America's strategies in the Middle East ... but that can not happen between overnight, Vchabk interests between the United States and some Arab countries (Saudi Arabia for example) passed through regional arrangements towards Israel for decades, as well as that any harmony of US-Iranian needs to procedures and modifications elevate the level of internal and external event. Here, a question arises: Is the United States ready for the reaction of Israel and Saudi Arabia? At a time in which America is engaged in a new alliance along the lines of the coalition at the liberation of Kuwait from the Iraqi Army (1990-1991), to fight the terrorism that is employed economic and military interests.
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Sat 16 Nov 2024, 3:44 pm