Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Federal: It is not within our competence to consider exclusion decisions on admission to the Judicia

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 278239
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Federal: It is not within our competence to consider exclusion decisions on admission to the Judicia Empty Federal: It is not within our competence to consider exclusion decisions on admission to the Judicia

    Post by Rocky Sun 31 Mar 2019, 2:41 am

    [size=36]Federal: It is not within our competence to consider exclusion decisions on admission to the Judicial Institute[/size]

    Political | 10:27 - 31/03/2019

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


    BAGHDAD - 
    The Federal Supreme Court on Sunday filed a lawsuit against the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, asserting that it is not competent to consider decisions of exclusion from admission to the Judicial Institute. 
    "The Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the attendance of all the members of the judges, and considered a case in which the prosecutor, the president of the Supreme Judicial Council, in addition to his job," the court spokesman Ayas al-Samuk said in a statement received by Mawazine News. 
    "The plaintiff requested the ruling to cancel the decision to exclude him from admission to the Judicial Institute, despite successfully passing the written test." 
    He pointed out that "
    The Spokesman stressed that "the decisions and decisions of the Federal Supreme Court are binding and binding on all authorities in accordance with Article (94) of the Constitution."


    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 278239
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°2

    Federal: It is not within our competence to consider exclusion decisions on admission to the Judicia Empty Federal Court to sue the President of the Supreme Judicial Council

    Post by Rocky Sun 31 Mar 2019, 2:56 am

    [rtl]

    Federal Court to sue the President of the Supreme Judicial Council

    [/rtl]
    [rtl]Editorial date: 2019/3/31 10:25 • 143 times prescribed[/rtl]
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    [rtl]
    (Baghdad: Al Furat News) The Federal Supreme Court responded to a lawsuit filed against the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, asserting that it is not competent to consider decisions of exclusion from admission to the Judicial Institute.
    "The Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all members of the judges, and considered a lawsuit in which the prosecutor, the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, in addition to his job," the spokesman of the court Ayas al-Samuk said in a statement received by the agency. 
    "The plaintiff requested the ruling to cancel the decision to exclude him from admission to the Judicial Institute, despite successfully passing the written test." 
    He pointed out that "the Federal Supreme Court considered the case in the presence of the plaintiff's agent, and returned to the terms of reference stipulated in Article (4) of its law No. (30) for the year 2005, and Article (93) of the Constitution did not find among them what the plaintiff requests, The case was dismissed by the non-jurisdiction. " 
    The Spokesman stressed that "the decisions and decisions of the Federal Supreme Court are binding and binding on all authorities in accordance with Article (94) of the Constitution."


    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    [/rtl]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Sat 28 Sep 2024, 2:03 pm