Shiite fears of disintegration of the National Alliance because of the insistence of al-Maliki on th

Shiite fears of disintegration of the National Alliance because of the insistence of al-Maliki on the third term




08/03/20140 



I went Shiite Supreme Najaf step further in terms of emphasis on the importance of forming a new Iraqi government acceptable to the national in the back in the dispute between the components of the National Alliance (Shiite bloc big inside Parliament and includes state law, led by Nuri al-Maliki and the Sadrist movement led by Muqtada al-Sadr and the Islamic Supreme Council, led by Ammar al-Hakim) into the open after the new coalition of state law adherence Maliki, a candidate for a third term.
Ahmed was pure representative of the Shiite cleric in Iraq, Ayatollah Sistani, during the Friday sermon yesterday, reiterated the need for «are the next government to accept a broad national», adding that «it should not lend itself to any one himself to be an impediment to check compatibility National management of the country in the next stage according to the principles of sound away from the cronyism and quotas Incorrect ». This comes with the approach of the constitutional deadline for the selection of a new prime minister next Thursday.
For his part, counting cleric and Iraqi academic Abdul Hussein al-Saadi, told the «Middle East», that «the assertions of religious reference about two months ago on the importance of giving priority to the supreme national interest and not to cling to positions, sites and national acceptance broad but they are clear messages to the parties to see that they have a legitimate Constitutional (in reference to the State of Law coalition, which came first place between the winning lists) and therefore must be assigned its candidate for the presidency of the government », indicating that« if things were measured in this way for the leader of the Iraqi List, Iyad Allawi, the granting of this right in 2010 but stood a matter of national acceptance spectra of the Iraqi people, different obstacle without it ». He said al-Saadi to «put Maliki now the most difficult in terms of being a part of a broader coalition, and this alliance represents the Shiite house, and there are assurances that the need for the survival of this house together, however, the available data now suggest that perhaps there will be no alliance senior Shi'ite in case remained Maliki clinging to power From the door of being a major bloc ».
In the context of that, said Ibrahim Bahr al-Ulum, a leading figure in the National Alliance in the mass citizen, led by al-Hakim, told the «Middle East», that «National Alliance did not agree so far on a single candidate for prime minister, despite the fact that there is a determination of all the forces and blocs and institutions Shia that the National Alliance is not a coalition of state law is a major bloc in the parliament away from any explanations, and a coalition of state law is part of this coalition and must abide by the decision of the whole political ». He explained that the Bahr al-Ulum «assurances of reference are clear messages and knows he is to be completely out of these messages, and as the reference method are driving the change comes out of this line will pay a heavy price».
The leading figures in the Islamic Supreme Council and the Sadrists exchanged for the first time criticism violent with the leaders of the coalition of state law on candidates for the formation of the government, both in terms of say, the existence of five candidates, including alternative to the owners from within his coalition (Tarek Najm) or stick to Maliki by a coalition of state law as a candidate unite, and argued that what he says Kiedio the Supreme Council and the Sadrists, but it is a part of science fiction.

 [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]