The world - [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]The head of the caretaker government in Iraq, Adel Abdul-Mahdi, warned the American coalition against the consequences of carrying out military actions that violate the country's sovereignty. This comes as the US-led coalition forces handed over their headquarters in several bases, amid doubts about American intentions for a greater escalation inside Iraq against the popular crowd.
This hypothesis is confirmed by a report published by the "New York Times" that confronting the Iraqi resistance groups has become seriously included on the agenda of US President Donald Trump.
In this context, strategic experts believe that what the United States conducted in Iraq is not a withdrawal but rather a repositioning with a limited number of bases. After the American forces were deployed in more than 14 bases, their presence today is in 4 bases or mainly in two bases, in Al-Assad was appointed to a silk base in Erbil, and the Patriot systems were later strengthened.
These moves are considered by experts as preparations for new American plans in Iraq and linked to the maneuvers that took place in the Emirates and to leaks reported by the New York Times that the United States is planning to deliver a "harmful" blow, according to the newspaper, to the Islamic resistance in Iraq.
Experts also confirm that this matter is also supported by the American speech, which has been speaking openly since the end of last year, and also with the targeting of martyrs leaders, with attacks in Iraq, after the United States claimed that it had accidentally hit the Iraqi army, police or crowd, or attacked Without comment.
Leaders in the Iraqi resistance factions see these moves as not a coincidence, and not just what the Americans claim to be an attempt to relocate or exit to hand over bases to Iraqi forces as much as they are specific goals the United States is trying to reach, by protecting American forces from the Iraqi resistance and moving them to places they think are Safe.
And they affirm that the United States is trying every time to fabricate excuses to target the sons of the resistance, because America understands that the factions of the resistance, especially the Hezbollah Brigades, are a stumbling block to its plans and try to impose their influence and military presence in Iraq completely and try to impose a political reality as they want and implement their agendas from Through this political reality and you think that these factions constitute a stumbling block and resistance to these plans, and this is why today you are trying to target these factions that took these threats seriously.
The Iraqi resistance believes that the Iraqi people have the right to resist America, its ominous plans and goals, noting that the Hezbollah Brigades have the ability and capabilities to confront the American forces and that the Iraqi people and its resistance factions are much stronger than the past and can face the American occupation.
Political analysts also see that the US administration is trying, through these moves, to escape the great crisis that Corona is going through and Trump is beginning to realize that he will lose the second term.
Iraqi politicians believe that America is floundering in many matters in the Middle East region, especially Iraq, since America is thinking of the mentality of the Israeli entity in the region, and therefore its presence in Iraq is more aggressive than it is strategic, and for this it falls into great mistakes, and these mistakes put the Iraqi government in Several crises and embarrassments, the largest of which is the issue of the assassination of senior leaders, considering that things have changed a lot on America in the Iraqi scene since the assassination of these senior leaders.
These politicians believe that America is more interested in and fear of the Mujahideen in the Hezbollah Brigades, Iraq, as they are experienced and have high intelligence and military experience, noting that, according to information leaked, senior American leaders in the Pentagon rejected the escalation step in Iraq categorically, as it would enter them into big mazes and make them You lose political allies in Iraq.
What do you think?
Has the Pentagon's response to groups of the Iraqi resistance become on its agenda?
- What does it mean to withdraw his forces to fortified bases in order to reduce possible attacks on them?
And why focus on the Hezbollah brigades and warn the PMF factions against mixing with them?
- And what does it mean to hold the Iraqi government responsible, or if Washington is forced to protect its forces?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]