These are Iranian pressure papers to dismantle “Save the Homeland.” The Democrat: We received our mi

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]These are Iranian pressure papers to dismantle “Save the Homeland.” The Democrat: We received our missile share[/size]

[size=45]The British "Middle East Eye" website revealed details of pressure and temptations exercised by Iran, especially on the Kurdistan Democratic Party and Parliament Speaker Muhammad al-Halbousi, in order to persuade them to abandon al-Sadr's political project and ensure the interests of its allies in Iraq.[/size]
[size=45]The British website also revealed, in a report, the details of the recent deal that al-Sadr presented to the leaders of the coordination framework in order to find a way out of the political blockage, which includes several proposals, and that the framework forces rejected the deal.[/size]
[size=45]soft wings[/size]
[size=45]And the British report quoted Iraqi politicians and observers as saying that “with about two weeks remaining until the deadline for al-Sadr’s withdrawal from political action, Iran believes that al-Sadr’s “tactical” withdrawal has given its allied forces an “indispensable” opportunity to dismantle his tripartite alliance with the leader. Kurdish Masoud Barzani and the leader of the Sovereignty bloc Muhammad al-Halbousi, noting that pressures have increased on what she called the "soft wings" of al-Sadr, represented by the Kurdistan Democratic Party and Sunni forces led by al-Halbousi.[/size]
[size=45]According to well-informed Iraqi politicians, "the Iranians and their allies are trying to isolate al-Sadr and force him to change his positions regarding the formation of the government, which opens the way for reaching an agreement that would allow the formation of a government that includes all the prominent forces."[/size]
[size=45]The report quoted a prominent Shiite leader close to Iran as saying that "Al-Sadr is stubborn and reckless, and does not mind pushing matters to the edge of the abyss if the Iranians intervene directly, unlike his Kurdish and Sunni allies."[/size]
[size=45]The Shiite leader added, "The Iranians chose to play with him in an indirect way, so doubling the pressure on Barzani and Al-Halbousi is more effective and less harmful than pressure on Al-Sadr."[/size]
[size=45]Sadr's allies[/size]
[size=45]After the report referred to “humiliating losses” suffered by Iran and its allies in the October 2021 elections, it quoted Iraqi politicians as saying that “Tehran is currently seeking to compensate for these losses, maintain its influence, and confront the tripartite alliance led by al-Sadr to stop his assumption of power, a matter that has become a priority.”[/size]
[size=45]The source, represented by the Shiite leader, pointed out that “the Iranians would be satisfied if some of the forces within the framework were represented by the government,” noting that “the settlement of the dispute between the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan over the presidential candidate, Iran views it as a key to ending the political impasse. “.[/size]
[size=45]According to the British report, Iran’s allies in Iraq considered that what Tehran is doing is not enough, as Iraqi politicians said that “the coordinating framework believes that greater pressure can be exerted on al-Sadr’s allies, in order to ensure that all the forces of the Shiite alliance are included in the government.”[/size]
[size=45]A bet on Barzani[/size]
[size=45]Although everyone knows that Iranian pressure is usually on Iraqi parties, ranging between intimidation and temptations, the British “Middle East Eye” quoted US and Iraqi officials as saying that they were not aware of the specific offer that Iran made to Barzani, but they expressed their appreciation that Tehran is able to Use of several tools.[/size]
[size=45]Iran can, according to what US and Iraqi officials say, “present Barzani with several temptations, including asking allied factions to relieve pressure, help the KDP obtain more prominent positions in the government, and support Erbil in its dispute with Baghdad over oil revenues. and ignoring the smuggling operations through Iranian territory.”[/size]
[size=45]Although three of the leaders of the Kurdistan Democratic Party refused to disclose any details regarding the offers from Iran, to the British “Middle East Eye”, they did not deny that there has been increased Iranian pressure in recent weeks.[/size]
[size=45]The report quoted a leader of the Kurdistan Democratic Party, who is close to Barzani, as saying, "We have received our share of Iranian pressure in advance, so is there greater pressure than the attack with ballistic missiles and the passage of a law that strips the regional government of its right to dispose of its oil?"[/size]
[size=45]The Kurdish leader added, "The Iranians are patient. They played the security card and the Federal Court, but they still have more papers, and what matters to them is that Al-Sadr does not change the balance in his way, and that things do not go the way he wants, but so far there is no change in our position, but if Al-Sadr chose to go to the opposition, the situation will change.”[/size]
[size=45]Al-Halbousi's opponents[/size]
[size=45]Regarding al-Sadr’s Sunni wing, the report pointed out that “pressure on al-Halbousi is a different story, as Iran has adopted a strategy to undermine his control over the Sunni arena with the support of political and clan leaders who are opponents of him and who can challenge his authority.”[/size]
[size=45]This comes after the return of figures such as former Finance Minister Rafie Al-Issawi and tribal leader Ali Hatem Al-Suleiman.[/size]
[size=45]The British report stated, "The recent court decisions to cancel cases filed against Al-Issawi and Suleiman represent part of Iran's attempts to undermine Al-Halbousi's control of the Sunni political scene."[/size]
[size=45]The report quoted a Sunni politician as saying that “the goal of bringing back such figures is clear. The target is the Sovereignty and Al-Halbousi alliance,” adding that whatever the form and size of the pressure, the Sovereignty Alliance cannot abandon al-Sadr now because that would mean our end. The compass can be changed if al-Sadr decides Go to the opposition, and only then will we be able to ally with the coordination framework.”[/size]
[size=45]chest moves[/size]
[size=45]The British report considered that “Al-Sadr, aware of the pressures exerted on his allies, called a few days ago the leaders of the coordination framework Hadi Al-Amiri and Faleh Al-Fayyad to meet at his headquarters in Al-Hanana in Najaf, and that Al-Sadr presented a new proposal with three options.[/size]
[size=45]Informed Shiite politicians indicated, according to the report, that “the first option included the idea that half of the coordinating framework’s deputies would join al-Sadr’s coalition, with the exception of the State of Law coalition led by Nuri al-Maliki, and the second option included the idea of ​​al-Maliki’s deputies joining al-Sadr, provided that the other half would be excluded from the coalition.” Representatives of the coordination framework, while the third option was to call for al-Sadr to join the opposition and to abandon the formation of the government to his opponents.[/size]
[size=45]frame position[/size]
[size=45]The report stated that "the coordination framework did not provide an official answer to Al-Sadr's latest offer, although some Shiite political leaders considered that the leaders of the framework would accept the division of their alliance in order to join Al-Sadr, but two of their leaders said that Al-Sadr's proposal had been rejected."[/size]
[size=45]According to one of the leaders of State of Law, he told the British website, “The offer was rejected because it was not possible to divide the ranks of the coordinating framework forces,” explaining that “there is a moral obligation between the framework forces and it cannot be violated by accepting al-Sadr’s offer.”[/size]
[size=45]Regarding the option of al-Sadr to go to the opposition, a leader in the coordinating framework told the website, “This is also not acceptable. The presence of the Sadrists in the opposition means that no government can stay for more than 6 months, or for a maximum year,” concluding his speech by saying, “What We have no choice but to dismantle the tripartite alliance and return al-Sadr to the Shiite embrace.”[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]