Home
Notes on the bidding process for the fifth and sixth supplementary petroleum licensing rounds
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Economy News - Baghdad
Former Director General of the Petroleum Contracts and Licensing Department, Abdul Mahdi Al-Amidi
Firstly. Eligible companies.
Many international oil companies have been qualified to participate in the competition for contracts in the fifth supplementary and sixth licensing round, including some that were previously qualified and some that have been newly qualified. Among the newly qualified companies are CAR (Iraqi-Kurdish-Bahraini) and Chinese company ZPEC. Both companies are not suitable to be qualified for exploration, development and production activity in the oil sector, as the first (KAR) specializes in the field of building, construction and electrical energy (and some refinery work) and the second works in the field of drilling wells and their accessories, such as some oil services that do not rise to the level of field development. Oil and gas (the company works as a subcontractor to carry out oil well drilling operations in the fields of licensing rounds with secondary contracts with contractors and operators of these fields). It is strange that the Ministry and its relevant arm (the Department of Petroleum Contracts and Licensing) qualified these two companies to participate in the licensing rounds!!!
secondly. Merging gas patches with oil patches and fields
When the Ministry of Oil launched the fourth licensing round for exploratory blocks, there was a merger between blocks with oil potential and those with gas potential, and when oil companies submitted their competitive bids, the focus was on blocks with oil potential over others, for reasons known to everyone, the most important of which is the ease of developing oil fields. The speed of recovery of petroleum costs, the fact that oil patch sites are better than gas patch sites, and so on. Comments were raised by some specialists about this, and the Ministry of Oil took them into consideration.
In the fifth complementary and sixth round, the Ministry repeats the same problem, and the oil and gas fields and patches are combined into a single competition process. The same scenario is also repeated by international oil companies, even if these companies are not at the same level as those in the fourth round, and a new focus is placed on projects with potential. Oil and non-gas oil fields.
Thus, the 16 exploratory patches with invasive potential were not referred. Once again, the Ministry of Oil and the country are losing the opportunity to explore and develop gas patches!? It is not clear why the oil patches and fields are transferred to foreign companies and there is no need for more crude oil production in light of the current and future conditions represented by the OPEC determinants and the transition to renewable and alternative energy?
It is also worth noting that the oil fields whose contracts have been awarded, such as Al-Dimah and Al-Dhafriya, are among the small fields that the national extractive companies can develop and produce directly, or that this is difficult for our companies after more than (15) years of working with major international oil companies. ???
Third. Companies winning contracts.
After completing the competition process, awarding contracts, and publishing the results, it became clear that most of the companies that participated in the process and submitted competitive bids were Chinese and Iraqi companies (the first day witnessed limited participation from Shell, Lukoil, and ADNOC). On the other two days, the arena was open to Chinese companies without competition from other companies.
As for the results of the referrals, the majority of them were limited to Chinese companies, with the exception of three contracts that were referred to CAR Company, and thus it can be considered that the process was distinctly Chinese (10 in favor of Chinese companies and 3 in favor of CAR Company).
Fourthly. Profit percentages.
Despite the importance of oil companies being qualified technically, financially and administratively (the ability to manage and operate) to be able to carry out exploration, development and production operations, what companies desire is a large profit from the projects they implement, which contradicts the desire of the ministry or the employer. reduce this profit. Therefore, it is necessary to reach a state of financial balance that satisfies both parties. This is in general, but what happened in the referral of some contracts to oil companies in the competition process is not consistent with this general rule in achieving the satisfaction of both parties and finding a financial balance for both.
It may come to mind that a financial imbalance occurred in favor of the Ministry of Oil (which is what we observed in the contracts of the first and second rounds, where profit wages for companies were in favor of the Ministry), but the opposite happened and the percentages of corporate profits were more and higher than they should be. This is first. The other issue is that there is a contradiction and lack of clarity in explaining how the percentages are high for some fields and low for others, as I will explain below.
1. In the original fifth licensing round, whose contracts were competed for in the year 2018, the percentages for some projects were as follows:
* The approved profit percentage for the Sanam Mountain area (14%), which was reduced from the original as in the economic model calculations, which is (21.85%) It was considered high and was therefore reduced to (14%). As for the percentage of profit according to which the contract was currently awarded, it amounted to (30.9%), and the difference is about (17%), which is very large, and the percentage increase is equal to (120%)???
* The approved profit percentage for the Zarbatiya patch is (4.77%), while the contract has currently been awarded with a profit percentage of (7.65%), with a difference of (2.88%), and the percentage increase is equal to (60%)???
* The approved profit percentage for the Al-Faw plot is (12.8%), while the contract has currently been awarded with a profit percentage of (25.16%), with a difference of (12.36%), which is very large, and the percentage increase is equal to (96%)???
It is worth noting that the profit percentages were announced in the competition process in the year 2018 and all those working on the subject are aware of this. I also personally provided one of the employees of the Department of Petroleum Contracts and Licensing with a copy of a review given to the then Minister of Oil, Mr. Jabbar Laibi, containing information about the profit percentages. For all contracts and his approval of the percentages (it is noted that other percentages have been reduced in this review). The attachment clarifies the information in the reading to avoid doubting the validity of what I am talking about.
2. The profit percentages according to which exploratory block contracts were awarded were as follows:
* Block No. -7 = (25.88%).
* Al-Khulaisiya patch = (32%).
* Hump Mountain patch = (30.9%).
* FAO patch = (25.16%).
This means that the higher profit percentages acceptable to the Ministry, which were in closed conditions, were higher than these percentages. How did this happen and what happened to make the economic calculations for each contract change, especially those that were within the original licensing round (as in 1 above), and be much higher than them in this current round???
3. The profit percentage according to which the Dhafriya field contract was awarded was (29.16%), which is very high and even higher than the profit percentages for the Al-Faw exploration block and the exploration block No. 7. This is very strange and unbelievable, given that the Dhafriya field is a discovered oil field that is not developed (non-productive) and does not contain an element of risk, as is the case in exploratory patches, and does not require repeating the seismic surveys that were carried out previously? The comparison between the Dhafriya field and the Dimah field in terms of percentage profit rates may be close to acceptable and reasonable, but the difference between the profit percentages for both is very far (29.16% for Al Dhafriyah compared to 6.2% for Dimah)!!!???
This analysis of the course of the competition process for the fifth supplementary and sixth licensing rounds, which led to the observations I mentioned above, is an abstract professional work and does not entail anything negative towards the people who contributed to this process, but it is not devoid of reminding and reconsidering what happened and it involves a high degree of care. In the best interest of Iraq.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Views 86
Added 05/15/2024 - 10:01 AM
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Economy News - Baghdad
Former Director General of the Petroleum Contracts and Licensing Department, Abdul Mahdi Al-Amidi
Firstly. Eligible companies.
Many international oil companies have been qualified to participate in the competition for contracts in the fifth supplementary and sixth licensing round, including some that were previously qualified and some that have been newly qualified. Among the newly qualified companies are CAR (Iraqi-Kurdish-Bahraini) and Chinese company ZPEC. Both companies are not suitable to be qualified for exploration, development and production activity in the oil sector, as the first (KAR) specializes in the field of building, construction and electrical energy (and some refinery work) and the second works in the field of drilling wells and their accessories, such as some oil services that do not rise to the level of field development. Oil and gas (the company works as a subcontractor to carry out oil well drilling operations in the fields of licensing rounds with secondary contracts with contractors and operators of these fields). It is strange that the Ministry and its relevant arm (the Department of Petroleum Contracts and Licensing) qualified these two companies to participate in the licensing rounds!!!
secondly. Merging gas patches with oil patches and fields
When the Ministry of Oil launched the fourth licensing round for exploratory blocks, there was a merger between blocks with oil potential and those with gas potential, and when oil companies submitted their competitive bids, the focus was on blocks with oil potential over others, for reasons known to everyone, the most important of which is the ease of developing oil fields. The speed of recovery of petroleum costs, the fact that oil patch sites are better than gas patch sites, and so on. Comments were raised by some specialists about this, and the Ministry of Oil took them into consideration.
In the fifth complementary and sixth round, the Ministry repeats the same problem, and the oil and gas fields and patches are combined into a single competition process. The same scenario is also repeated by international oil companies, even if these companies are not at the same level as those in the fourth round, and a new focus is placed on projects with potential. Oil and non-gas oil fields.
Thus, the 16 exploratory patches with invasive potential were not referred. Once again, the Ministry of Oil and the country are losing the opportunity to explore and develop gas patches!? It is not clear why the oil patches and fields are transferred to foreign companies and there is no need for more crude oil production in light of the current and future conditions represented by the OPEC determinants and the transition to renewable and alternative energy?
It is also worth noting that the oil fields whose contracts have been awarded, such as Al-Dimah and Al-Dhafriya, are among the small fields that the national extractive companies can develop and produce directly, or that this is difficult for our companies after more than (15) years of working with major international oil companies. ???
Third. Companies winning contracts.
After completing the competition process, awarding contracts, and publishing the results, it became clear that most of the companies that participated in the process and submitted competitive bids were Chinese and Iraqi companies (the first day witnessed limited participation from Shell, Lukoil, and ADNOC). On the other two days, the arena was open to Chinese companies without competition from other companies.
As for the results of the referrals, the majority of them were limited to Chinese companies, with the exception of three contracts that were referred to CAR Company, and thus it can be considered that the process was distinctly Chinese (10 in favor of Chinese companies and 3 in favor of CAR Company).
Fourthly. Profit percentages.
Despite the importance of oil companies being qualified technically, financially and administratively (the ability to manage and operate) to be able to carry out exploration, development and production operations, what companies desire is a large profit from the projects they implement, which contradicts the desire of the ministry or the employer. reduce this profit. Therefore, it is necessary to reach a state of financial balance that satisfies both parties. This is in general, but what happened in the referral of some contracts to oil companies in the competition process is not consistent with this general rule in achieving the satisfaction of both parties and finding a financial balance for both.
It may come to mind that a financial imbalance occurred in favor of the Ministry of Oil (which is what we observed in the contracts of the first and second rounds, where profit wages for companies were in favor of the Ministry), but the opposite happened and the percentages of corporate profits were more and higher than they should be. This is first. The other issue is that there is a contradiction and lack of clarity in explaining how the percentages are high for some fields and low for others, as I will explain below.
1. In the original fifth licensing round, whose contracts were competed for in the year 2018, the percentages for some projects were as follows:
* The approved profit percentage for the Sanam Mountain area (14%), which was reduced from the original as in the economic model calculations, which is (21.85%) It was considered high and was therefore reduced to (14%). As for the percentage of profit according to which the contract was currently awarded, it amounted to (30.9%), and the difference is about (17%), which is very large, and the percentage increase is equal to (120%)???
* The approved profit percentage for the Zarbatiya patch is (4.77%), while the contract has currently been awarded with a profit percentage of (7.65%), with a difference of (2.88%), and the percentage increase is equal to (60%)???
* The approved profit percentage for the Al-Faw plot is (12.8%), while the contract has currently been awarded with a profit percentage of (25.16%), with a difference of (12.36%), which is very large, and the percentage increase is equal to (96%)???
It is worth noting that the profit percentages were announced in the competition process in the year 2018 and all those working on the subject are aware of this. I also personally provided one of the employees of the Department of Petroleum Contracts and Licensing with a copy of a review given to the then Minister of Oil, Mr. Jabbar Laibi, containing information about the profit percentages. For all contracts and his approval of the percentages (it is noted that other percentages have been reduced in this review). The attachment clarifies the information in the reading to avoid doubting the validity of what I am talking about.
2. The profit percentages according to which exploratory block contracts were awarded were as follows:
* Block No. -7 = (25.88%).
* Al-Khulaisiya patch = (32%).
* Hump Mountain patch = (30.9%).
* FAO patch = (25.16%).
This means that the higher profit percentages acceptable to the Ministry, which were in closed conditions, were higher than these percentages. How did this happen and what happened to make the economic calculations for each contract change, especially those that were within the original licensing round (as in 1 above), and be much higher than them in this current round???
3. The profit percentage according to which the Dhafriya field contract was awarded was (29.16%), which is very high and even higher than the profit percentages for the Al-Faw exploration block and the exploration block No. 7. This is very strange and unbelievable, given that the Dhafriya field is a discovered oil field that is not developed (non-productive) and does not contain an element of risk, as is the case in exploratory patches, and does not require repeating the seismic surveys that were carried out previously? The comparison between the Dhafriya field and the Dimah field in terms of percentage profit rates may be close to acceptable and reasonable, but the difference between the profit percentages for both is very far (29.16% for Al Dhafriyah compared to 6.2% for Dimah)!!!???
This analysis of the course of the competition process for the fifth supplementary and sixth licensing rounds, which led to the observations I mentioned above, is an abstract professional work and does not entail anything negative towards the people who contributed to this process, but it is not devoid of reminding and reconsidering what happened and it involves a high degree of care. In the best interest of Iraq.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Views 86
Added 05/15/2024 - 10:01 AM
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
» utube 10/3/24 MM&C Iraq Update-Iraq Securities Exchange- Transform Iraq-Export Oil - Federal Co
» MM&C 10/3/24 Central Bank comments on preparing the budget for next year
» MM&C 10/3/24 World Bank: Iraq has made progress in improving the business environment, making it glo
» Commission: Kurdistan elections will include international and local monitoring
» Swiss Embassy in Baghdad reopens after 33 years of closure
» Rafidain counts the number of government departments that have activated the electronic collection s
» Parliamentary demands to review all agreements with Jordan
» This is the date for the launch of the seventh batch of social assistance
» Trade reassures citizens: We have food reserves sufficient for a whole year
» Baghdad.. The dollar records 154,250 dinars for every hundred dollars
» Dhi Qar.. Implementation of an arrest warrant against four suspects in the Real Estate Registration
» Parliament receives draft law to cancel economic privileges with Jordan
» Kurdish comment on the possibility of an armed confrontation between parties before the elections in
» Why have the salaries of the region's employees not been localized yet? A Kurdish politician explain
» Dollar prices continue to soar in Iraqi markets
» Intensive calls for comprehensive reform at Baghdad International Airport amid deteriorating service
» Iraqi government condemns “Tulkarm crime”: International community’s silence fuels Israeli aggressio
» “Hidden Costs”: How do 140 days of holidays affect the economy and daily life?
» Parliamentary work details the most important laws it is working to legislate
» New crisis hits Iraqi real estate market after 100% tax
» Labor sets date for launching seventh batch of social assistance
» Ports deny the existence of an oil spill at the confluence of territorial waters (Iraq-Kuwait-Iran).
» MP dismisses the person closest to the Coordination to assume the presidency of Parliament
» Economist: Oil prices could rise to $200 if war expands
» Parliamentary work: We seek to legislate laws that guarantee union freedom
» Parliamentary Finance clarifies to "Alsumaria News" the legality of imposing taxes on citizens and s
» Trump's advisor speaks to Sumaria about the possibility of dragging Iraq into war
» Morning list of dollar exchange rates against the dinar in Iraq
» Kuwaiti official: Our relationship with Iraq has been integrated for 400 years and the border issue
» Parliamentary Planning: Population census will include counting furniture inside homes
» Parliamentary demand to include the Commission Law on the Parliament’s agenda House of Representativ
» Dominican Republic Plans to Start Deporting up to 10,000 Haitians per Week
» Dozens of Meat Processing Plants Expected to Shut Down Under New EPA Rules
» Biden-Harris administration blasted for running out of money to deal with Hurricane Helene after blo
» Fake Amazon sites everywhere
» utube 10/1/24 MM&C Iraq Dinar News - Iraqi Stock Exchange - Private Sector - Water - Infrastructure
» The dinar collapses against the dollar.. Is the specter of 1600 looming on the horizon?
» Baghdad International Airport: Why is it unable to compete with regional airports?
» Nineveh reveals projects worth billions that have been stalled for 12 years
» Iraq calls for protecting oil routes in the Arabian Gulf
» State of Law Leader: America Has No Desire to Leave Iraq
» MP reveals 170 stalled projects have been resolved
» Rafidain Bank announces the collection of more than four trillion dinars electronically for the bene
» Karbala Municipality: Starting to plant gardens and green spaces inside residential neighborhoods
» Customs: Our revenues during 7 months of the current year exceeded one trillion dinars
» World Bank: Iraq is witnessing a major transformation in improving the business environment and publ
» New program turns unified card into food ration card in Iraq
» The Governor of the Central Bank of Iraq announces the launch of financial transfers to Türkiye acco
» World Bank issues optimistic report on Iraq, points to 'major transformation'
» Supply concerns send oil prices up more than 5 percent
» Rafidain: More than 4 trillion dinars in electronic collection amounts for government departments
» Iraqi government opens accounts to deposit donors' money for Gaza and Lebanon
» Public money and government wheels enter the Kurdistan Parliament elections propaganda
» How did current events cast their shadows on the Iraqi parliament presidency file?
» Production stops at Karbala refinery.. and the local government acknowledges the shortage of fuel su
» Iraq imports large quantities of calves and sheep to control meat prices
» IMF: Continued conflict in Middle East could have major economic repercussions
» Israel threatens to bomb more than 35 sites in Iraq
» The crisis of choosing the parliament speaker.. Will political tensions impose “Al-Mashhadani” on “A
» “Hidden Terrorism”: How Cyber Weakness Threatens Iraq’s Future More Than Bullets?
» Iraq plans to establish modern industrial cities amid challenges of electricity and corruption!
» Ministry of Planning reveals details of drawing the new population map in Iraq
» Al-Sudani: Escalation in Lebanon and Gaza threatens to slide the region into a comprehensive war
» Planning: Taking measures that focus on promoting sectors that affect citizens’ lives
» Civil Service Council approves new batch of appointments
» Commerce reveals new program that transforms the unified card into a food ration card
» Iraq announces launch of new mechanism for financial transfers to Türkiye
» Transparency: Sulaymaniyah and Halabja imports amounted to more than 11 billion dinars in one week
» Parliamentary Integrity: Collecting parliamentary signatures to question the Minister of Constructio
» Parliamentary talk about the person closest to the coordination to assume the presidency of Parliame
» Gov. Ron DeSantis orders National Guard to end longshoremen's strike over hurricane disaster
» BREAKING: Mayor Pete orders citizens to stop using drones to find stranded victims as feds fumble hu
» Elon Musk obliges Trump, reconnects disaster areas to the internet for free via Starlink
» MM&C 10/3/24 Amending the Oil Law: A Step Towards Reform or Just Another Promise?
» In less than half an hour, Washington sends three messages via Baghdad to Tehran
» "Soon" .. Iraqi-Kuwaiti negotiations to resume to end differences
» On the seventh anniversary of Talabani’s passing, Al-Sudani recalls his national legacy and his role
» Planning: The general census will show the rates of enrolment in education and unemployment.
» Economist: Zionist bombing exacerbates economic conditions, calls for urgent intervention by governm
» Iraq, Kuwait to resume negotiations "very soon" to resolve outstanding issues
» Iraq and China take the largest share of Iranian goods
» Advisor Mazhar Saleh: No concern about Iraq's financial situation
» Amidst the Storms: Baghdad and Washington Support Regional Calm
» MP reveals reasons for delaying the approval of the Personal Status Law
» Al-Surji: The Union is capable of forming the next regional government
» Government measures to control the region's import of gold
» Central Bank comments on preparing the budget for next year
» Anbar citizens threaten to demonstrate over private generator pricing
» Dollar trading halted in Anbar due to high exchange rate
» Iraqi Parliament Prepares to Pass “Most Important” Law to Recover State Funds from Corrupt People
» World Bank identifies key issue for sustainable development in Iraq
» World Bank: Iraq has taken steps to develop human capital
» Electricity: Loss of 7,100 megawatts due to a decrease in the release of national gas and the supply
» Work: Issuing more than 220 thousand national cards for those covered by social protection
» France: Recommendation to eliminate 100,000 jobs to reduce government spending
» Iraq, Turkey sign MoU on migration and voluntary return
» Al Mazrouei: The world needs additional investments in the energy sector
» Agriculture announces compensation for livestock farmers’ losses, plans to control diseases