Pentagon skips tests on key component of U.S.-based missile defense system

This rocket interceptor at Ft. Greely, Alaska, is part of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, the nation's main defense against a potential missile attack by Iran or North Korea.
(John Wagner / Fairbanks Daily News-Miner)
David Willman[email=david.willman@latimes.com?subject=Regarding:%20%22Pentagon%20skips%20tests%20on%20key%20component%20of%20U.S.-based%20missile%20defense%20system%22]Contact Reporter[/email]
Against the advice of its own panel of outside experts, the U.S. Missile Defense Agency is forgoing tests meant to ensure that a critical component of the nation’s homeland missile defense system will work as intended.
The tests that are being skipped would evaluate the reliability of small motors designed to help keep rocket interceptors on course as they fly toward incoming warheads.
The components, called alternate divert thrusters, are vital to the high-precision guidance required to intercept and destroy an enemy warhead traveling at supersonic speed – a feat likened to hitting one speeding bullet with another.
The interceptors, deployed in underground silos at Vandenberg Air Force Base in Santa Barbara County and at Ft. Greely, Alaska, are the backbone of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system (GMD) – the nation’s main defense against a sneak attack by North Korea or Iran.

$40-billion missile defense system proves unreliable
The interceptors are multi-stage rockets, each with a 5-foot-long “kill vehicle” at its tip. The 150-pound kill vehicle is designed to separate from its rocket in space, fly independently at 4 miles per second and crash into an enemy warhead, destroying it.
The performance of the divert thrusters, which are supposed to keep the kill vehicles on course during their final approach to their targets, has been a source of concern for several years. In response, the Missile Defense Agency oversaw development of a new and supposedly better version, the alternate divert thruster.
An outside panel of experts privately advised the agency to put the alternate divert thrusters through “hot fire” testing, in which they would be revved up on the ground to see whether they burned smoothly and delivered adequate propulsion.
But in order to stay on schedule for a planned expansion of the GMD system, none of the 40 thrusters that are being installed on 10 new interceptors will undergo hot-fire testing, government officials told the Los Angeles Times.
Forgoing the tests “increases the risk for reliability issues going undetected,” according to a newly released report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office. The report says that such testing “verifies proper performance and workmanship.”
Based on a commitment made three years ago by the Obama administration, the missile agency is moving to expand the number of interceptors from 30 to 44 by the end of 2017.
There are now four at Vandenberg Air Force Base and 26 at Ft. Greely. According to a Missile Defense Agency spokesman, the total will reach 37 by the end of this year and 44 by the end of 2017. All of the new interceptors are going to Ft. Greely.
The GAO report, dated Feb. 17 and prepared for members of Congress, says the missile agency “has made progress” toward fielding more interceptors. But the report says the agency is “relying on a highly optimistic, aggressive schedule that overlaps development and testing with production activities, compromises reliability [and] extends risk to the warfighter.”
The missile agency commissioned the panel of outside experts in 2013 to “identify design, reliability, manufacturing [and] test process improvements to enhance the reliability” of the interceptors, according to agency documents.

Missile Defense: The Pentagon's $10-billion bet gone bad
The experts recommended in March 2014 that the agency conduct hot-fire testing on each of the alternate thrusters — or on a sample of those that were to be deployed, according to officials familiar with the matter.
The experts’ recommendation regarding the thrusters is mentioned in the GAO report. Their complete assessment of the interceptor fleet has not been made public.
The missile agency, in written comments to The Times, said it “does not agree with the GAO’s conclusion” that forgoing the hot-fire testing compromises the system’s reliability. The agency said it “has assessed it is not necessary to hot fire” each thruster “prior to emplacement.”
The agency said “a very thorough series” of hot-fire tests was completed in May 2015 on 14 experimental thrusters— components made for design purposes that will not be put into the arsenal.
The agency also said that alternate divert thrusters were used on a test rocket fired in January, and that technicians are reviewing data from that flight to determine how the components performed.
The thrusters will be evaluated again in an exercise later this year in which a rocket will attempt to intercept a mock warhead, the agency said.
But the agency acknowledged that none of the thrusters it has subjected to hot-fire testing “will be installed on fleet interceptors’’ deployed as part of the GMD system.
GAO analyst Cristina Chaplain, author of the recent report, underlined the point:
“There’s not going to be any hot-fire testing of the individual thrusters that are being produced for integration into the kill vehicles," she said in an interview.
Chaplain said the hot-fire testing of experimental models “does not give you much insight into whether" the thrusters produced for integration into the nation’s arsenal will be “free from workmanship or quality problems."
Then-Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, center, and then-Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska), second from left, inspect a rocket interceptor in its silo at Ft. Greely in 2009.
(John Wagner / Fairbanks Daily News-Miner)
The GMD system is designed to repel a “limited” missile attack by a non-superpower adversary such as Iran or North Korea. The nation's defense against a massive nuclear assault by Russia or China still relies on “mutually assured destruction,” the Cold War notion that neither country would strike first for fear of a devastating counterattack.
GMD’s roots go back to the Clinton administration, when concern began to mount over the spread of missile technology. In 2002, President Bush ordered “an initial set of missile defense capabilities” to be put in place within two years.
To accelerate deployment, then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld exempted the missile agency from the Pentagon’s standard procurement rules and testing standards.
Engineers trace the GMD system’s difficulties to the breakneck pace at which components were produced and fielded. In precisely scripted flight tests above the Pacific, interceptors have failed to hit mock enemy warheads about half the time.
The new GAO report concludes that the missile agency’s flight testing has been “insufficient to demonstrate that an operationally useful defense capability exists.”
The system has cost taxpayers more than $40 billion to date.
Some serious problems have been traced to the kill vehicles and their intricate electronic components.
A rocket interceptor is launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base on Dec. 15, 2010. The interceptor's kill vehicle failed to intercept and destroy a mock enemy warhead.
(Vandenberg Air Force Base)
In a December 2010 flight test, technicians concluded that vibrations within the kill vehicle disrupted its sensitive guidance system, preventing it from hitting the target missile. In three other tests, most recently in July 2013, the kill vehicle failed to separate from its boost rocket.
The undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, Frank Kendall III, has attributed the problems largely to the hurried schedule.
“The root cause was a desire to field these things very quickly and very cheaply,’’ Kendall told a defense conference in early 2014, adding, “We are seeing a lot of bad engineering, frankly, and it was because there was a rush.’’
Divert thrusters were developed to help address problems observed during flight tests. But performance issues emerged in ground testing of the first thrusters, prompting development of the alternate thrusters.
A GAO report last May revealed that the missile agency — to keep pace with the scheduled expansion of the interceptor fleet – chose to equip eight new kill vehicles with the earlier, deficient thrusters.
The GAO recommended then that the agency delay putting those eight kill vehicles in the silos until the alternate divert thrusters were ready. The missile agency did not follow the advice.
In written remarks last June to some members of Congress and their staffs, Vice Adm. James D. Syring, director of the missile agency, defended the decision. He said technicians installed software “to mitigate performance issues identified with the original thruster.”
Syring added: “Delivering the eight new interceptors provides the warfighter with significant additional capability … earlier than waiting for the alternate divert thrusters.’’
Philip E. Coyle III, an engineer who formerly headed the Pentagon’s operational testing office, said that the missile agency is inviting unnecessary risk by scrapping the recommended hot-fire testing.
The approach, Coyle said, conjures “the old saying, 'Why is there never enough time to do it right—but always enough time to do it over?’’’
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-missile-defense-hot-fire-testing-20160317-story.html
This rocket interceptor at Ft. Greely, Alaska, is part of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system, the nation's main defense against a potential missile attack by Iran or North Korea.
(John Wagner / Fairbanks Daily News-Miner)
Against the advice of its own panel of outside experts, the U.S. Missile Defense Agency is forgoing tests meant to ensure that a critical component of the nation’s homeland missile defense system will work as intended.
The tests that are being skipped would evaluate the reliability of small motors designed to help keep rocket interceptors on course as they fly toward incoming warheads.
The components, called alternate divert thrusters, are vital to the high-precision guidance required to intercept and destroy an enemy warhead traveling at supersonic speed – a feat likened to hitting one speeding bullet with another.
The interceptors, deployed in underground silos at Vandenberg Air Force Base in Santa Barbara County and at Ft. Greely, Alaska, are the backbone of the Ground-based Midcourse Defense system (GMD) – the nation’s main defense against a sneak attack by North Korea or Iran.
$40-billion missile defense system proves unreliable
The interceptors are multi-stage rockets, each with a 5-foot-long “kill vehicle” at its tip. The 150-pound kill vehicle is designed to separate from its rocket in space, fly independently at 4 miles per second and crash into an enemy warhead, destroying it.
The performance of the divert thrusters, which are supposed to keep the kill vehicles on course during their final approach to their targets, has been a source of concern for several years. In response, the Missile Defense Agency oversaw development of a new and supposedly better version, the alternate divert thruster.
An outside panel of experts privately advised the agency to put the alternate divert thrusters through “hot fire” testing, in which they would be revved up on the ground to see whether they burned smoothly and delivered adequate propulsion.
But in order to stay on schedule for a planned expansion of the GMD system, none of the 40 thrusters that are being installed on 10 new interceptors will undergo hot-fire testing, government officials told the Los Angeles Times.
Forgoing the tests “increases the risk for reliability issues going undetected,” according to a newly released report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office. The report says that such testing “verifies proper performance and workmanship.”
Based on a commitment made three years ago by the Obama administration, the missile agency is moving to expand the number of interceptors from 30 to 44 by the end of 2017.
There are now four at Vandenberg Air Force Base and 26 at Ft. Greely. According to a Missile Defense Agency spokesman, the total will reach 37 by the end of this year and 44 by the end of 2017. All of the new interceptors are going to Ft. Greely.
The GAO report, dated Feb. 17 and prepared for members of Congress, says the missile agency “has made progress” toward fielding more interceptors. But the report says the agency is “relying on a highly optimistic, aggressive schedule that overlaps development and testing with production activities, compromises reliability [and] extends risk to the warfighter.”
The missile agency commissioned the panel of outside experts in 2013 to “identify design, reliability, manufacturing [and] test process improvements to enhance the reliability” of the interceptors, according to agency documents.
Missile Defense: The Pentagon's $10-billion bet gone bad
The experts recommended in March 2014 that the agency conduct hot-fire testing on each of the alternate thrusters — or on a sample of those that were to be deployed, according to officials familiar with the matter.
The experts’ recommendation regarding the thrusters is mentioned in the GAO report. Their complete assessment of the interceptor fleet has not been made public.
The missile agency, in written comments to The Times, said it “does not agree with the GAO’s conclusion” that forgoing the hot-fire testing compromises the system’s reliability. The agency said it “has assessed it is not necessary to hot fire” each thruster “prior to emplacement.”
The agency said “a very thorough series” of hot-fire tests was completed in May 2015 on 14 experimental thrusters— components made for design purposes that will not be put into the arsenal.
The agency also said that alternate divert thrusters were used on a test rocket fired in January, and that technicians are reviewing data from that flight to determine how the components performed.
The thrusters will be evaluated again in an exercise later this year in which a rocket will attempt to intercept a mock warhead, the agency said.
But the agency acknowledged that none of the thrusters it has subjected to hot-fire testing “will be installed on fleet interceptors’’ deployed as part of the GMD system.
GAO analyst Cristina Chaplain, author of the recent report, underlined the point:
“There’s not going to be any hot-fire testing of the individual thrusters that are being produced for integration into the kill vehicles," she said in an interview.
Chaplain said the hot-fire testing of experimental models “does not give you much insight into whether" the thrusters produced for integration into the nation’s arsenal will be “free from workmanship or quality problems."
Then-Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, center, and then-Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska), second from left, inspect a rocket interceptor in its silo at Ft. Greely in 2009.
(John Wagner / Fairbanks Daily News-Miner)
The GMD system is designed to repel a “limited” missile attack by a non-superpower adversary such as Iran or North Korea. The nation's defense against a massive nuclear assault by Russia or China still relies on “mutually assured destruction,” the Cold War notion that neither country would strike first for fear of a devastating counterattack.
GMD’s roots go back to the Clinton administration, when concern began to mount over the spread of missile technology. In 2002, President Bush ordered “an initial set of missile defense capabilities” to be put in place within two years.
To accelerate deployment, then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld exempted the missile agency from the Pentagon’s standard procurement rules and testing standards.
Engineers trace the GMD system’s difficulties to the breakneck pace at which components were produced and fielded. In precisely scripted flight tests above the Pacific, interceptors have failed to hit mock enemy warheads about half the time.
The new GAO report concludes that the missile agency’s flight testing has been “insufficient to demonstrate that an operationally useful defense capability exists.”
The system has cost taxpayers more than $40 billion to date.
Some serious problems have been traced to the kill vehicles and their intricate electronic components.
A rocket interceptor is launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base on Dec. 15, 2010. The interceptor's kill vehicle failed to intercept and destroy a mock enemy warhead.
(Vandenberg Air Force Base)
In a December 2010 flight test, technicians concluded that vibrations within the kill vehicle disrupted its sensitive guidance system, preventing it from hitting the target missile. In three other tests, most recently in July 2013, the kill vehicle failed to separate from its boost rocket.
The undersecretary of Defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, Frank Kendall III, has attributed the problems largely to the hurried schedule.
“The root cause was a desire to field these things very quickly and very cheaply,’’ Kendall told a defense conference in early 2014, adding, “We are seeing a lot of bad engineering, frankly, and it was because there was a rush.’’
Divert thrusters were developed to help address problems observed during flight tests. But performance issues emerged in ground testing of the first thrusters, prompting development of the alternate thrusters.
A GAO report last May revealed that the missile agency — to keep pace with the scheduled expansion of the interceptor fleet – chose to equip eight new kill vehicles with the earlier, deficient thrusters.
The GAO recommended then that the agency delay putting those eight kill vehicles in the silos until the alternate divert thrusters were ready. The missile agency did not follow the advice.
In written remarks last June to some members of Congress and their staffs, Vice Adm. James D. Syring, director of the missile agency, defended the decision. He said technicians installed software “to mitigate performance issues identified with the original thruster.”
Syring added: “Delivering the eight new interceptors provides the warfighter with significant additional capability … earlier than waiting for the alternate divert thrusters.’’
Philip E. Coyle III, an engineer who formerly headed the Pentagon’s operational testing office, said that the missile agency is inviting unnecessary risk by scrapping the recommended hot-fire testing.
The approach, Coyle said, conjures “the old saying, 'Why is there never enough time to do it right—but always enough time to do it over?’’’
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-missile-defense-hot-fire-testing-20160317-story.html
» The Minister of Finance talks about imbalance and corruption in the Iraqi financial system
» Al-Kazemi sends a message to the country's leaders: The government cannot live without a budget
» Al-Kazemi: The government cannot live without the budget ,
» Basra is suing the finances to obtain funds equivalent to one-fifth of Iraq's budget
» The departure of the “leader” of the white paper .. 3 possible reasons for the resignation of Financ
» With the increasing demand for residential complexes in Iraq, Iraqis' purchase of Turkish real estat
» Two months after its 57% rise, Iraq sells about one billion dollars in US bonds, instead of transfer
» Parliamentary move to open the "den of corruption" in the Rashid and Al-Rafidain banks, and to pros
» With more than 8 billion dollars annually... Iraq is the first importer from Iran
» Allawi: The Iraqi economy is a victim of a major corruption network that works to protect the politi
» Erbil .. Masrour Barzani inaugurates the third international exhibition for real estate and investme
» Food security and the white paper.. Expose the reasons for the resignation of the Minister of Financ
» Al-Kazemi links the Iraqi situation with the events of Singapore and Rwanda: Tomorrow I will call fo
» Praise for the government's achievements and anger at the political conflict.. Details revealed from
» Al-Sadr refuses to participate in the dialogue that Al-Kazemi called for
» Al-Abadi: The stage is critical and de-escalation is a necessity
» The Federal Service Council approves the appointment of those covered by the law on the grading of m
» Minister of Planning: Iraq seeks to achieve more economic integration with the countries of the regi
» Tomorrow... Al-Kazemi: I will call for an Iraqi national dialogue for all the country's leaders
» Al-Kazemi calls for an Iraqi national dialogue for all the country's leaders
» To stop the escalation, Al-Kazemi invites the political forces to a meeting at the government palace
» Al-Fateh expresses a position on the government palace dialogue tomorrow
» Al-Amiri Alliance: Using the street does not bring results..Negotiations are the solution
» The Kurdistan Union diagnoses a group of positive indicators of a breakthrough in the crisis
» Design: the current and the frame the cause of the current crisis
» Alsumaria News publishes the text of the resignation of the Minister of Finance
» The United States confirms its support for the independence of the Central Bank of Iraq
» An Iraqi move to establish economic free zones
» That is why “Al-Sadr went crazy”: A “leak” of a “framework plan” to overthrow Al-Sadr and isolate hi
» A foreign report reveals Iraqis' resentment over the continuation of the demonstrations and fear of
» Construction: The electronic collection automation project reduces water consumption
» The Order Committee (50) announces the recovery of 1,376 properties belonging to the state
» With the participation of 180 companies... the launch of the Erbil International Real Estate and Inv
» Learn about the map of the Iraqi political forces supporting and rejecting the dissolution of Parlia
» An informed source: The coordination framework will send a delegation to Saudi Arabia headed by Amma
» A close source: Ali Allawi requests to resign from his position and is awaiting official approval
» Al-Kazemi assigns the Minister of Oil the duties of the Ministry of Finance as an agency
» Al-Amri and Plasschaert discuss the most important political developments
» Decreased cash sales of the dollar in the bank auction
» Labor stresses the need to provide funds to cover the social protection program
» Integrity announces the recovery of nearly 1,400 properties belonging to the state
» In the presence of the Prime Minister .. the launch of the third Erbil International Real Estate and
» Will Iran repeat the nuclear mistake as it did with Iraq at the end of the eighties?
» In the presence of the Prime Minister .. the launch of the third Erbil International Real Estate and
» Al-Hakim: We look forward to overcoming the current suffocation and proceeding with the completion o
» Al-Sadr announces the postponement of Saturday's demonstration until further notice
» The political process is in a state of silence in light of the disagreement of the blocs.. Video
» “Satisfies the frame and the chest.” Al-Fateh talks about a “single solution” to the political crisi
» The Council of Ministers holds its regular session headed by Al-Kazemi
» Officially.. the Minister of Finance submits his resignation - Urgent
» The political blockage at the table of Al-Amiri and Plasschaert in Baghdad - urgent
» A legal sets the date for the expiry of the food security law and sets the reasons for
» The framework unanimously agrees on 4 conditions before going to the dissolution of Parliament - urg
» Al-Mulla To "Earth News": It Is Not Possible To Skip The Political Consensus Regarding The Dissoluti
» Two prominent senators call on Biden to provide more support to the Kurdistan Region
» A preliminary agreement on the location of the first sessions of Parliament, following the latest de
» The five boycotters reveal the reason for their disagreement with Darjal: We will not lead a coup
» A decision to form a Syrian-Iraqi Business Council
» Al-Kazemi’s Advisor Resolves The Controversy Over State Spending In The Absence Of The Budget
» Energy Police: Seizures And Cranes For Trading In Oil Derivatives In Baghdad And Basra
» Nassif Calls On The Judiciary To Put Its Hand On Iraqi Money In Light Of The Current Political Turmo
» Asa’ib responds to “Minister Al-Sadr”: We have tired you and hurt you
» The coordination framework meeting ends with four conditions to achieve Al-Sadr's demand
» Al-Sadr's Minister issues instructions on Saturday: The crowd and the judiciary are a red line
» Al-Alusi comments on the seizure of his money: a decision to blackmail me, and I will not stop confr
» The coordination framework is knocking on the doors of Saudi Arabia with a delegation led by Al-Haki
» An Iraqi bank decides to reduce the interest on loans to employees and cancels the sponsor's require
» Iraq records a decline of nearly a billion dollars in holding US bonds
» In compliance with Oak's decision, Iraq's exports will rise to 3 million and 800 thousand barrels pe
» Construction: The electronic collection automation project reduces water consumption
» With the support of the European Union...FAO holds a meeting in Chabayish to discuss the drying up o
» The environment reveals a national plan to remove radioactive pollution from Iraq
» The Embassy of Iraq in Abu Dhabi honors outstanding Iraqi students in the UAE
» Baghdad investment: the visit of the delegation of the Iraqi Media Network to the Commission and to
» Barzani's party offers a solution to end repeated Turkish violations in northern Iraq
» Trading volume decreased by 67% in the Iraqi Stock Exchange during the month of July
» Baghdad hosts the Third Interfaith Conference for Peace and International Cooperation in the presenc
» Emami said in a statement yesterday, "The conclusion of twinning agreements between Iranian border c
» The salt tongue invades the Shatt al-Arab and reaches unprecedented levels
» Observers: Saturday's demonstrations will determine the strength of the political parties in the str
» Al-Amiri in the longest tour before “Million Al-Sadr”: 400 km to reach Al-Hanana and no clear result
» An American message about the joint economic cooperation between it and Iraq, especially in the ener
» Hoshyar Zebari: The political tension between the framework and the current has reached its peak and
» Al-Sadr: Do not raise my pictures and do not chant my name during Saturday's "million" demonstration
» The conflict of the 'current' and the 'framework' is escalating.. Has the moment of al-Sistani come?
» Al-Fateh: It is possible to solve the political crisis in the country if President Barzani intervene
» A deputy in the Kurdistan Democratic Party explodes a surprise: restoring confidence in the Al-Kazem
» Zebari tweets about the tension between the current and the framework and reminds of the Kurdish civ
» Al-Sadr issues instructions regarding the millionth demonstration
» In conjunction with Al-Sadr's million, the Al-Attar Demonstrations Committee calls on its audience t
» Mishaan al-Jubouri: The judiciary is the last of the fortresses, and by threatening it, we read peac
» The National Union sends a message to the Democrat regarding heading to Baghdad
» Barzani: The Democrat did not and will not give up the rights of Kurdistan
» Minister al-Sadr: The tire plays with fire
» A leader in the Sadrist movement: Sadr's life is in danger
» Nassif calls for stopping the aviation authority's contract with a company dealing with the "Israeli
» The central bank denies granting sums of money to citizens
» Iraqi bank cuts interest on loans to employees