Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Federal Supreme Court issues a clarification on Article 249 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Sunday

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 264726
    Join date : 2012-12-21

    Federal Supreme Court issues a clarification on Article 249 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Sunday Empty Federal Supreme Court issues a clarification on Article 249 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Sunday

    Post by Rocky Sun 18 Feb 2018, 4:36 am

    Federal Supreme Court issues a clarification on Article 249 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

    Sunday 18 February



    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    The Federal Supreme Court on Sunday issued a clarification on Article 249 of the Code of Criminal Procedure No. 23 of 1971, indicating that the article does not intersect with the principles of human rights and freedoms contained in the Constitution, pointing out that the interim decisions issued by the investigating judge under which Not immune to appeal. 

    "The Federal Supreme Court held its hearing today in the presence of all the members and considered the appeal against the unconstitutionality of article 249 (b) and (c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure," said Ayas al-Samuk, a spokesman for Al-Sumerian News. No. (23) of 1971 ".




    He added that "the plaintiff stated in his lawsuit that the paragraphs of the rights and freedoms of citizens by preventing the appeal of some decisions of the investigating judge." 

    Samok added that "the court found that the article was designed to secure the speed of resolving the cases and prevent procrastination and procrastination from some parties to the lawsuit, and the interim decisions issued in accordance with these paragraphs are not immune, but not immune to the challenge, subject to challenge with the decision in the case before the competent court Appeal ". 

    He explained that "the ruling of the Federal Supreme Court stated that the paragraphs challenged their unconstitutionality do not violate the principles of human rights and freedoms contained in the Constitution, but the contrary is to accelerate the arrival of rights to the owners, and then decided to respond to the lawsuit for not based on the basis of the Constitution.




    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

      Current date/time is Tue 20 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm