Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Federal Court: deferment of debts of farmers and farmers are not opposed to the Constitution

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 281327
    Join date : 2012-12-21

      Federal Court: deferment of debts of farmers and farmers are not opposed to the Constitution Empty Federal Court: deferment of debts of farmers and farmers are not opposed to the Constitution

    Post by Rocky Sun 03 Jun 2018, 2:18 pm

    Federal Court: deferment of debts of farmers and farmers are not opposed to the Constitution
    June 03 2018 02:11 PM
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    [rtl][rtl]Federal Supreme Court[/rtl]
    [/rtl]
    Follow-Up



    The Federal Supreme Court confirmed on Sunday that postponement of the debts of farmers and farmers is not opposed to the Constitution.


    "The Federal Court held its session under the chairmanship of Midhat Al-Mahmoud and the presence of all the members of the judges, and considered a lawsuit filed by the Director of the Agricultural Cooperative Bank, in addition to his job to challenge the unconstitutionality of Article (20 / II) of the Federal Budget Law for the fiscal year 2018 ".


    He added that "the paragraph contested unconstitutional stipulates that it defers the completion of government debts owed by farmers and farmers whose loans do not exceed (250) million dinars in all governorates of Iraq with no debt to bear any interest during the postponement.


    He explained that "the Federal Supreme Court decided to respond to the lawsuit because it is based on a constitutional bond, where there is no conflict between postponement of the fulfillment of those debts and the provisions of the Constitution." 



    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

      Current date/time is Tue 26 Nov 2024, 9:51 pm