Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    An upcoming meeting to settle disputes over 6 remaining articles of the Federal Court Law

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 265289
    Join date : 2012-12-21

    An upcoming meeting to settle disputes over 6 remaining articles of the Federal Court Law Empty An upcoming meeting to settle disputes over 6 remaining articles of the Federal Court Law

    Post by Rocky Sat 06 Mar 2021, 7:29 am

    POSTED ON [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

    [size=52]An upcoming meeting to settle disputes over 6 remaining articles of the Federal Court Law[/size]

    [size=45]The Presidency of the Council of Representatives is discussing with the heads of the political blocs and the Parliamentary Legal Committee, in an upcoming meeting, the contentious articles that hindered the passage of the Federal Court law in order to agree on them.[/size]
    [size=45]The differences revolve around whether to keep the president of the current court with one of its members or to refer him to retirement, as well as granting the right of veto to Sharia jurists, in addition to the court meeting.[/size]
    [size=45]6 controversial materials[/size]
    [size=45]Representative Bahar Mahmoud, a member of the Legal Committee in the House of Representatives, stated in a statement to (Al-Mada) that "the differences between the blocs and the components have hindered the completion of the legislation of the Federal Court Law." To reach an agreement to pass it ».[/size]
    [size=45]The House of Representatives voted in Thursday's session on eighteen articles out of twenty-four articles of the Federal Court bill, which pushed the Presidency of the House of Representatives over the rest of the articles to a next parliamentary session.[/size]
    [size=45]Articles in Federal Court Law[/size]
    [size=45]Mahmoud talks about the most prominent controversial articles that caused the postponement of voting on the rest of the articles, saying that “the second article in the law, which relates to the number of members of the court proposes that their number be (11) members, but there are parliamentary blocs that demanded that the number of Islamic Sharia jurists in the court be two Only while other blocs objected and demanded an increase in their number to (4) four, ”explaining that“ if the number of jurists increases to four, the number of members of the court will increase to 13 members. ”[/size]
    [size=45]The Parliamentary Legal Committee chose the draft law of the Federal Court sent by the government and neglected the draft amendment sent by the Presidency of the Republic, which proposes to amend only Article 3 of the law in force regarding the replacement of members of the court.[/size]
    [size=45]And she added, "There is a group of parliamentary blocs insisting on granting Islamic law jurists the right of veto within the Federal Court (participating in voting on decisions taken by the court just like judges), which is matched by objection by other parliamentary blocs demanding that Islamic law jurists and legal scholars be granted an advisory role only.[/size]
    [size=45]veto[/size]
    [size=45]Those calling for granting Sharia jurists and jurists the right to veto and participate in court decisions, just as judges, claim their interpretation of Article 92 of the Constitution, which states that the Federal Court consists of a group of judges, experts in Islamic jurisprudence, and experts in jurisprudence.[/size]
    [size=45]Over the course of four consecutive parliamentary sessions, the blocs and components failed to pass the Federal Court bill for reasons related to the disputes based on the mechanism for nominating members of the court, the method of voting, and the powers of Sharia and legal scholars.[/size]
    [size=45]Article 92 / First of the Constitution stipulates the nature of the composition and composition of the court by saying: (The Federal Supreme Court consists of a number of judges, experts in Islamic jurisprudence and legal scholars whose number is determined and the method of their selection and the work of the court is regulated by a law enacted by a two-thirds majority of the members of the House of Representatives).[/size]
    [size=45]And the deputy from the Sulaymaniyah governorate continues that "this is one of the most prominent controversial articles that will be presented for discussion at the meeting of the political blocs on Saturday in order to reach an agreement on it," adding that "the issue of the Federal Court meeting is also one of the contentious materials."[/size]
    [size=45]She explained that "the law stipulates that decisions are taken by the majority of the members of the absolute Federal Court, but there are others who demand that decisions be two-thirds of the number of members, and there are those who demand that decisions be made unanimously," adding that "the term of the Sharia jurists will be 12 years and the members of the court according to age, which determines Later" .[/size]
    [size=45]The fate of the chief justice[/size]
    [size=45]The Kurdish MP continues, “Among the other controversial articles are those related to the status of members of the Federal Court, as the law says that the current members of the court are subject to the general retirement law. By referring them all to retirement ».[/size]
    [size=45]The Media Department of the Council of Representatives stated that the Presidency of the Council will meet with the Legal Committee and heads of political blocs next Saturday to discuss the remaining articles of the Federal Court Law.[/size]
    [size=45]She pointed out that "the completion of the vote on the Federal Court law is contingent on the talks and negotiations that will be conducted by parliamentary legal talks with the heads of political blocs to reach an agreement on contentious articles.[/size]
    [size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

      Current date/time is Wed 28 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm