The deadline for the security agreement has expired.. Will Tehran bomb the Kurdish opposition in Ira

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]The deadline for the security agreement has expired.. Will Tehran bomb the Kurdish opposition in Iraq?[/size]

[size=45]There are several Iranian concerns about Iraq's ability to dismantle groups opposed to Tehran within Iraqi Kurdistan, which raises scenarios for the return of Iranian bombing of northern Iraq, which means the collapse of the security agreement between the two countries.[/size]
[size=45]Last March, the two countries reached a security agreement stipulating the disarmament of Kurdish groups, transferring them to other places, and closing their military headquarters, in exchange for Tehran stopping its military operations inside Iraqi territory, after a series of Iranian missile and artillery bombardments on the headquarters of the Iranian Kurdish opposition based in the Iraqi Kurdistan region. Its headquarters.[/size]
[size=45]The two sides set September 19 as the date for implementing the terms of the agreement, under which Iraq pledged “not to allow armed groups to use its lands in the Kurdistan region to launch any cross-border attacks on its neighbor, Iran.”[/size]
[size=45]The Iranian Foreign Ministry vowed at the time that “if the agreement is not implemented on time, we will fulfill our responsibilities towards the terrorist groups in Iraqi Kurdistan,” she said.[/size]
[size=45]Two Iranian experts agree that the difficulty of dismantling the Kurdish groups opposing their country in the Kurdistan region of Iraq complicates Baghdad's mission in implementing the security agreement concluded with Tehran, and they confirmed the possibility of repeated Iranian bombing of the headquarters of those groups in the future.[/size]
[size=45]Will Iran succeed in repeating the experience of expelling members of the Mujahedeen-e-Khalq organization (which it considers a terrorist group) from Iraq in 2013, or does the future hold different scenarios?[/size]
[size=45]Comment from both sides:
Iran classifies opposition Kurdish parties based in northern Iraq - such as the Kurdistan Free Life Party, the Iranian Kurdistan Democratic Party, and the Komala Party - as “armed terrorists,” accusing them of working to fragment the country and separate the Kurdish regions from the Islamic Republic.[/size]
[size=45]By the time limit set for implementing the security agreement, the Iraqi Higher Committee responsible for implementing the security agreement with Tehran announced “evacuating the offices of those anti-Iranian groups near the borders of the two countries, disarming them and transferring them to places far from the borders,” noting that “members of these groups will be considered refugees according to controls.” UNHCR.”[/size]
[size=45]On the other hand, Iranian Chief of Staff Major General Mohammad Bagheri said, “Iraq did not implement the agreement concluded between the two sides,” adding that “the text of the security agreement explicitly indicates the necessity of disarming and expelling these separatist terrorist organizations from the Kurdistan region and from all parts of Iraq, but what happened “It is to move these organizations a little further from our borders.”[/size]
[size=45]In press statements, the Iranian military official added, “President Ebrahim Raisi has instructed us to wait a few more days, before we send some committees to ensure that these armed groups are completely disarmed, and then we will take the necessary decision.”[/size]
[size=45]A relative achievement
in this context. The former commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, retired Brigadier General Hussein Kanaani Moghadam, revealed that his country had sent a team of experts to the Iraqi Kurdistan region to inspect what had been accomplished on the ground, indicating a relative success of the Iranian will, which was to remove the Kurdish opposition from the common border. , and transported it deep into Iraqi territory in the Iraqi Kurdistan region, disarmed its heavy weapons, and placed the Iraqi army under control of the border strip.[/size]
[size=45]Speaking to Al Jazeera Net, Kanaani Moghadam explained that the reports that became available to Tehran confirm the extent of part of the Kurdish opposition to comply with the terms of the security agreement, and therefore what has been implemented does not meet the Iranian ambition stipulated in the agreement. It is to prevent the infiltration of opposition Iranian Kurdish militias, remove their members from the common border, remove their camps, disarm, and hand over wanted persons whom Tehran confirms are involved in “terrorist acts within its territory,” according to his description.[/size]
[size=45]The former leader of the Revolutionary Guard spoke of an understanding between Tehran and Baghdad to implement the agreement in 3 stages. The control of the Iraqi forces over the border strip and the removal of militants from the border constitutes only the first stage of it, stressing that Iran is determined to completely disarm the militias during the second stage, and remove the militants permanently. The extradition of wanted persons is in the final stage.[/size]
[size=45]A complex mission
. The Director-General of the Iranian “Nakah Now” agency, Mehdi Azizi, revealed that a number of senior military leaders of the Kurdish opposition had left Iraq for European countries, and that a number of other middle leaders refused to move to United Nations camps.[/size]
[size=45]Speaking to Al Jazeera Net, Azizi explained that he sensed Iraqi seriousness in implementing the security agreement while accompanying an Iranian delegation that recently met with a number of Iraqi officials in Baghdad, adding that some elements of the Iranian Kurdish opposition enjoy political support from some political forces in the Kurdistan region of Iraq.[/size]
[size=45]He added that some Kurdish opposition groups have integrated into the Kurdish fabric in northern Iraq, contrary to the will of Baghdad, stressing the difficulty of dismantling the groups opposing his country in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. This complicates Baghdad’s mission to fully implement the security agreement.[/size]
[size=45]Dear retired Brigadier General Hussein Kanaani Moghaddam shared his opinion regarding the possibility of repeating the Iranian bombing of the headquarters of some Kurdish groups in the Iraqi Kurdistan region in the future, stressing that his country will maintain the military option to neutralize the dangers of the Kurdish opposition, “because the security agreement allows Tehran to destroy these terrorists if Iraq does not fulfill its promise.” ", according to his expression.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]