War: The English courts stopped judgment to compensate Iraqis

War: The English courts stopped judgment to compensate Iraqis


10/04/2017


He said the legal expert Tareq Harb "English courts stopped judgment to compensate Iraqis and US courts have never control what happened damages as a result of damage from the entry of the two Iraqi forces."
He said the war in a press statement obtained "direction Press" a copy of which was "in memory of 04.09.2017 dealt with some of the media the issue of compensation for those affected by the British forces and US troops after entering Iraq on this day there was Ray-Ban can set up lawsuits against the Iraqi British courts and US courts to claim compensation and this speech and opinion in which large exceeded the truth? ".
"The British courts ruled compensation to Iraqis for damages diagnosed British troops involved the overthrow of the former regime and the occupation of Iraq after 4/9/2003, where these courts have ruled numerous claims of large sums in compensation to Iraqis for damages diagnosed by these forces, and in that period time but the English judiciary and the courts in English, since for more than a year, took over the Lord rejected lawsuits brought by Iraqis for Iraqis did not govern compensation. "
He explained that "the British courts adopted on the provisions of Article 232 of the Iraqi Civil Law No. 40 of 1951, which set the duration of the statute of limitations to claim compensation for damage where committed that article establishing claims for compensation within three years, which stipulates the following / do not hear suit arising from the work of illegal compensation whatever after the expiration of three years from the day it was announced by the injured obtaining the damage and the person who brought about / as the English troops left Iraq before more than eight years, the limitation period and the duration of the fall is available in accordance with Iraqi law, so the English courts did not control payments to compensate Iraqis and J as a legal ploy disposed by the English government and the courts English claims for compensation based on Iraqi law, said any law is the law of which the English law, contrary to the general rule, which says / courts apply its own state laws / any English court applied English law and Iraqi courts apply true Iraqi law that this is reported after the appearance of corruption, one of the owners of the relationship and a British law firm in compensation cases, especially since they were taking the largest share of the compensation and so it was an obstacle to Iraqi law and the Iraqi objection to obtain compensation p Damage from injury when English troops presence in Iraq. "

He continued , "The US courts , it rejects these claims and did not control compensation in any case for any Iraqi and what happened governance in certain cases as an issue (Blackwater) the security company and the issue of the killing of one woman and issued by the death of the US courts of Artbtab these crimes, the verdicts were not because of damage to the Iraqis, but on the basis of non - compliance with the rules of engagement under US law, we find that there is a complainant who represents the US government was not the complainant and that the families of the victims attended some of these trials, but did not judge them for compensation. ". sa

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]