Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Is the regime in Iraq a democracy or another regime?

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 278941
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Is the regime in Iraq a democracy or another regime? Empty Is the regime in Iraq a democracy or another regime?

    Post by Rocky Sun 09 Dec 2018, 7:53 am

    Is the regime in Iraq a democracy or another regime?
     Saturday 08 December 2018





    It is completely wrong to think that the current regime in Iraq is a democratic system because the Iraqi constitution refers to this and the method of election to choose the representatives of the people in parliament, which represents the legislative authority in the country and the subsequent procedures for the election of the president, To form a government that represents the executive branch. Formally, it seems to most Iraqis that it is a genuine and correct democratic practice in accordance with the basic principles of developed and civilized democracies as in European countries such as England, France, Germany and others, or the United States and other countries of the civilized world.
    The Iraqi experience in governance during the post-2003 period, especially in the current stage, clearly indicates, in accordance with the practices of all the political forces that control the Iraqi affairs with all their concepts, principles, methods, practices, relations and history, that the nature of governance in Iraq is not based at all on the bases, Accepted. To prove simply that the nature of the regime in Iraq is not an absolute democratic system, but rather a hybrid system that combines several contradictory principles, bases and premises. First, those who control the political scene in Iraq are political Islam parties, and that is the reality. It is known and obvious (and even the stupid knows that) that Islam basically depends in its system on succession and allegiance and not in Islam religion and law and the year any recognition of free and general elections to choose representatives of peoples compete without any condition. So any democratic system you talk about in Iraq is under the political Islam parties. Second, the correct democratic systems do not have any blatant practices in the field of fraud in elections or bribes or purchase of receivables or the purchase and sale of sites and positions and other events such as burning ballot boxes or documented records of bargaining for manipulation of election results and others. In the event of any negative practice whatsoever, all relevant bodies in those democratic civilized countries will investigate and follow up with effective public monitoring that does not allow anyone to go beyond the basic principles of democracy. In Iraq (Democratic), many of the accusations questioned the integrity of the elections with many violations of the electoral process has been diagnosed and announced by many of the parties and persons who participate mainly in the electoral process. But the result was the lack of clarity in all things in addition to the absence of any follow-up either by the relevant official bodies or by the masses, which overshadowed everything that goes on in the political process. Thirdly, in the proper democratic systems, there are no parties that participate in the elections and have armed wings, because any party with an armed wing, whatever it may be, is considered a gang or a mafia that is never allowed any political participation, but on the contrary fights and is subject to legal accountability. In Iraq (Democratic), most of the parties involved in the political process have armed wings effective and influential, and these parties are those who won the elections. This simply means that those who govern Iraq really are gangs and mafias organized well and smart and have a psychological impact on the simple citizen under certain different names to accept and belong to them and applauds the Iraqi citizen ignorant and backward and absent. Fourthly, there is no one or two people in the proper democratic system who alone control the future of the country. The country in those systems is entirely subject to the institutional rules laid down by the laws and the constitution adopted by society. In Iraq, the main focus of Iraq's future and destiny is Muqtada al-Sadr, who has a very large Iraqi constituency (mostly ignorant, absent, uninformed, disobedient, and prepared for any chaotic practices) and al-Amiri, who controls large and influential militia forces, And its significant impact on the Iraqi scene in general. These two are the ones who control the administration of Iraq. Where is democracy in this area? Fifthly, the correct democratic systems do not have other social and sub-sectarian systems that govern or influence the political scene according to their traditions and concepts. In Iraq, however, there is the tribal role and influence in all its dimensions. The country in those systems is entirely subject to the institutional rules laid down by the laws and the constitution adopted by society. In Iraq, the main focus of Iraq's future and destiny is Muqtada al-Sadr, who has a very large Iraqi constituency (mostly ignorant, absent, uninformed, disobedient, and prepared for any chaotic practices) and al-Amiri, who controls large and influential militia forces, And its significant impact on the Iraqi scene in general. These two are the ones who control the administration of Iraq. Where is democracy in this area? Fifthly, the correct democratic systems do not have other social and sub-sectarian systems that govern or influence the political scene according to their traditions and concepts. In Iraq, however, there is the tribal role and influence in all its dimensions. The country in those systems is entirely subject to the institutional rules laid down by the laws and the constitution adopted by society. In Iraq, the main focus of Iraq's future and destiny is Muqtada al-Sadr, who has a very large Iraqi constituency (mostly ignorant, absent, uninformed, disobedient, and prepared for any chaotic practices) and al-Amiri, who controls large and influential militia forces, And its significant impact on the Iraqi scene in general. These two are the ones who control the administration of Iraq. Where is democracy in this area? Fifthly, the correct democratic systems do not have other social and sub-sectarian systems that govern or influence the political scene according to their traditions and concepts. In Iraq, however, there is the tribal role and influence in all its dimensions. In Iraq, the main focus of Iraq's future and destiny is Muqtada al-Sadr, who has a very large Iraqi constituency (mostly ignorant, absent, uninformed, disobedient, and prepared for any chaotic practices) and al-Amiri, who controls large and influential militia forces, And its significant impact on the Iraqi scene in general. These two are the ones who control the administration of Iraq. Where is democracy in this area? Fifthly, the correct democratic systems do not have other social and sub-sectarian systems that govern or influence the political scene according to their traditions and concepts. In Iraq, however, there is the tribal role and influence in all its dimensions. In Iraq, the main focus of Iraq's future and destiny is Muqtada al-Sadr, who has a very large Iraqi constituency (mostly ignorant, absent, uninformed, disobedient, and prepared for any chaotic practices) and al-Amiri, who controls large and influential militia forces, And its significant impact on the Iraqi scene in general. These two are the ones who control the administration of Iraq. Where is democracy in this area? Fifthly, the correct democratic systems do not have other social and sub-sectarian systems that govern or influence the political scene according to their traditions and concepts. In Iraq, however, there is the tribal role and influence in all its dimensions. These two are the ones who control the administration of Iraq. Where is democracy in this area? Fifthly, the correct democratic systems do not have other social and sub-sectarian systems that govern or influence the political scene according to their traditions and concepts. In Iraq, however, there is the tribal role and influence in all its dimensions. These two are the ones who control the administration of Iraq. Where is democracy in this area? Fifthly, the correct democratic systems do not have other social and sub-sectarian systems that govern or influence the political scene according to their traditions and concepts. In Iraq, however, there is the tribal role and influence in all its dimensions.
    In summary, as stated above, the regime in Iraq is a hybrid system between the 
    democratic system, the individual dictatorship, the totalitarian dictatorship, the family system and the individual system. Iraqis have to find a suitable term to express the regime that governs them. It is not a democratic system but a system of ??????????? . Iraqis have to find a label that suits your regime.


    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Sun 13 Oct 2024, 12:04 am