72 critical hours for “renegotiation” with independents before the new session to elect the “preside

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]72 critical hours for “renegotiation” with independents before the new session to elect the “president”[/size]

[size=45]Baghdad / Tamim Al-Hassan[/size]
[size=45]The Sadrist movement assumes that it made “negotiating mistakes” and a “falsification” occurred that led to the failure of the Saturday session to choose the president of the republic. The current and its partners in "Save the Nation" will begin to avoid these lapses in the next 72 hours, in preparation for Wednesday's session, which is the new date for electing the "president."[/size]
[size=45]After the end of the parliament session, Muqtada al-Sadr, the leader of the movement, closed the door to any ready-made interventions or recipes from neighbors to solve the crisis.[/size]
[size=45]On the other hand, the “frameworkers” portrayed the obstruction of the election of the President of the Republic as a “positive and democratic matter,” while before that they were confused and sent delegations to Parliament to monitor the session.[/size]
[size=45]The leader of the Sadrist movement, after the session, stressed not to return to the Attar mixture, referring to previous interventions from Tehran and other countries in forming the government.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sadr said, in a tweet on Twitter, "Thank you to everyone who attended the session out of love for Iraq: Thank you coalition to save the nation, thank you for extension, thank you for the new generation, thank you for the independent brothers."[/size]
[size=45]He added: “These people are not terrified by a threat or tempted by inducement,” adding: “Your date will be renewed next Wednesday with those who will join again to remove corruption, dependency and consensus: a national majority government.”[/size]
[size=45]And he continued, "We will not go back to (Al-Attar's mixture). Today, we have proven and proved that there is no place for quotas.. It was the most beautiful Iraqi mosaic, neither eastern nor western."[/size]
[size=45]The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Muhammad al-Halbousi, stressed the need to continue holding the sessions until the quorum for electing the President of the Republic is achieved.[/size]
[size=45]A statement to the House of Representatives said last Saturday, that “Al-Halbousi made it clear during the parliament session that the paragraph of electing the president of the republic requires a quorum of two-thirds of the number of members of the parliament, according to what was approved by the Federal Court and stipulated by the constitution in this regard.”[/size]
[size=45]Al-Halbousi indicated, according to the statement, that "the failure to achieve the required quorum requires us to continue holding sessions until the quorum for the election of the president is achieved."[/size]
[size=45]The House of Representatives adjourned its last session to next Monday, while setting Wednesday as the date for electing the President of the Republic.[/size]
[size=45]This happened after the failure of "Save the Homeland", which is the alternative name for the three coalition, which includes the Sadrists, part of the Sunnis and the Kurds, to achieve a two-thirds majority, at least 220 seats, to vote on the presidential candidate.[/size]
[size=45]According to the information received by the (range) that "the Sadrist movement is convinced that what happened on Saturday was due to mistakes in the negotiation process."[/size]
[size=45]On the eve of the session, the news and statements of the “Party” suggested that it had obtained sufficient seats, and that the latter no longer needed further negotiations.[/size]
[size=45]And the information reported by sources close to the scenes of politics goes on, that “there was a mistake made in communicating with Kurdish blocs, Sunni personalities and independents, who did not attend the session and were counted in a false way in favor of the boycotters.”[/size]
[size=45]At the beginning of the session, the “Coordination Framework” published a document addressed to the Speaker of Parliament, which the “Coordination” said represented 126 deputies boycotting the session.[/size]
[size=45]The sources add that the defect in the communications was with "the Islamic Union bloc, the Kurdistan Justice, Ishraqa Kanon, and a number of independents."[/size]
[size=45]The parties to the tripartite alliance “Save the Homeland” were charged with reaching an understanding with those parties, but what happened, according to the sources, “was a misdistribution of the negotiators’ roles.”[/size]
[size=45]Saturday's session needed only 18 deputies to achieve the two-thirds majority needed to elect the president of the republic.[/size]
[size=45]The sources indicate that the parties that did not negotiate between them and the "trio" were absent from the boycott camp in the home of former Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki.[/size]
[size=45]The latter camp took advantage of the absence of these parties in the session to announce for its part that it had joined the "blocking third" team, and there are doubts about the number of seats in the "coordinating framework."[/size]
[size=45]The "frameworkers" presented the boycott's document that it included 81 deputies from the "Coordination Committee", along with the "National Union" with 18 seats, the Azm alliance 12, Ishraqa Kanon 6, the independents' vote 3 seats.[/size]
[size=45]In addition, Bassem Khashan joined the independents category, the Kurdistan Justice Group had one seat, and the Kurdistan Islamic Union had four seats.[/size]
[size=45]The document was presented without signatures, with the exception of one paper that showed the signatures of 18 members of the "Union", while the remaining signatures of the boycotters were not published.[/size]
[size=45]One seat fell from the camps of supporters and boycotters, as the total of the two parties reached 328, according to the official statistics of the two parties, while the deputy, whose name was missing, was “complaining” about the lack of contact with him from any party.[/size]
[size=45]Representative Khaled Sultan Hashem, who is the son of the former defense minister in Saddam's regime, confirmed that his absence was "exploited" in favor of one party against another in the Saturday session.[/size]
[size=45]A statement issued by Hashem, who is the only winning representative of the Iraqi national project led by Jamal al-Dari and who is close to Khamis al-Khanjar, leader of the "Siyada" coalition and partner of "Al-Sadr", said that "there was a lot of rumors about the position of Representative Khaled Sultan Hashim Ahmed al-Taie for not attending the session." …) as some parties took advantage of this position for their own ends, promoting this position in favor of one side against another.”[/size]
[size=45]The statement considered that the position of the representative is clear: “However, not sending an official invitation to us to join an announced alliance with such calls for representatives within blocs consisting of one person or independent representatives makes our position a stand of power and steadfastness for those who wanted to marginalize us as a national project or as a representative who carries a national heritage. known to the near and far.”[/size]
[size=45]Boycott party![/size]
[size=45]The boycotters turned their presence in the hospitality of Al-Maliki into a celebration, while Ahmed Al-Asadi, one of the leaders of the Al-Fateh Alliance, described Saturday's session as a "beautiful scene."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Asadi said in a tweet on "Twitter" on Saturday, "The scene was very beautiful today, as each of us was working to mobilize the largest number of deputies supporting him, without affecting the origin of friendship and dialogue."[/size]
[size=45]He explained, "It is a democratic practice that will bear fruit after a while."[/size]
[size=45]The "frameworkers" mitigated the negative form of the boycott, as they now use the term "guarantee third" on the Lebanese way to describe the "blocking third".[/size]
[size=45]Information was also leaked about the return of the "Coordination Council" to attempts to communicate with the Sadrist movement, and the repeated request to involve the rule of law in the government "without al-Maliki."[/size]
[size=45]But so far, it does not seem that among the agenda of the leader of the Sadrist movement, Muqtada al-Sadr, is negotiating with the "Coordination Committee", but with "independent" parties.[/size]
[size=45]According to the information, during the next three days, mistakes will be “averted” in the negotiation and re-communication with some of the boycotters who were essentially “absent from the session” and were not accounted for by any party.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]