Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Iraq Dinar/News is a popular topic among many topics this board offers. You must log in to see and participate in our Dinar sections.

Ever heard of Bitcoin? I encourage you to veiw my 4 minute video about the Bitcoin of Health Care CoinMD. Just load set up a free 30 day test ride and contact me as needed. I have a Facebook informational page you can request to join for all my mist updates.


I can be reached by phone or text 7am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2017

All Polls Favoring Clinton’s Candidacy Are Fake-Here Is How to Tell


Posts : 26963
Thanked : 1437
Join date : 2013-01-12

All Polls Favoring Clinton’s Candidacy Are Fake-Here Is How to Tell

Post by Lobo on Sat 18 Jun 2016, 4:00 pm

All Polls Favoring Clinton’s Candidacy Are Fake-Here Is How to Tell

Hillary Clinton is leading Donald Trump by 10%. Why not 20%? Why not 50%? These numbers mean nothing with regard to the intentions of the people most likely to vote in the upcoming general election.

NY Times Summary of the 2016 Election Polls
Updated June 17, 2016

National Polling Averages

Hillary Clinton  44%

Donald J. Trump   38%

Well, based on these numbers reflecting a huge Clinton lead, we must assume that Donald Trump has no chance. Why even bother voting? Many who are influenced by the polls will conclude that nothing will ever change because that is because the polls say so. As people share their doubts about the viability about a Trump Presidency, the doubts spawned by the polls, will grow like wildfire. The polls negative projections about Donald Trump’s chances will cause all but the die-hard supporters to lose interest because their candidate cannot win.
As the principle of group think kicks in, the doubt in Trump’s chances will spread exponentially. Why? Because some poll told them that was the case. Hence, this is how polls can help determine election outcomes.

The Polls Are Often Wrong

The polls have a very poor track record of being correct. Even the MSM entity, US News, vilifies the use of polls in accurately predicting election results:
“In 2012, his own campaign’s polls, among others, predicted Mitt Romney, the Republicans’ nominee, would defeat President Barack Obama for the presidency, but just barely. Two years later, surveys in Kentucky strongly suggested then-Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, perhaps the shrewdest, most powerful Republican in Washington, could lose his seat to an upstart rookie Democrat”. Obviously, neither event ever came close to happening.

The Political Experts Don’t Trust Polls

Cliff Zukin, a polling expert at Rutgers University stated that “Polls can no longer make fine distinctions. People can trust polls on broad issues — like what voters are most concerned about — but not so much on the political horse race.”
Celinda Lake, a pollster, political consultant and president of Lake Research Partners, a Washington, D.C.-based polling firm, says polling has seen “kind of a steady decline. It’s getting harder to reach people. It’s also harder to get them to cooperate.”
Michael Traugott is a University of Michigan political science professor who specializes in polling and opinion surveys and he has stated that polls cannot be trusted for a variety of reasons and that he is in agreement with Gallup when they say the industry is in need of a “major overhaul”.
What many of these experts are referring to is the death of the legitimacy of public opinion polls due to insufficient sample size. When polls do not have enough participants, the results cannot be considered to be valid. The way that polls cover up this deficiency is to report an official sounding statistic that gives fake legitimacy to the results (e.g. the poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3%). In actuality, the legitimate poll would state something like “the statistical confidence level with regard to the accuracy of this poll is 95% or higher”. The representation of this notion is usually expressed as a level of confidence and it looks like this: P=<.05.   If you don’t see this statistic, the poll, on its face, is unreliable.

The Tavistock Institute and the Use of Public Opinion Polls

Dating back to 1913, the Tavistock Institute used polls to shape public opinion into accepting Britain’s entry into World War I.
The plan to ‘create’ public opinion through the fake reporting of bogus polling date began as a propaganda factory centered at Wellington House in London. Sir Edward Grey, the British Foreign Secretary at the time, installed Lord Northcliffe (Britain’s most influential newspaper magnate) as its director. Lord Northcliffe’s position was supervised by Lord Rothmere on behalf of the British Crown. The operational staff of Wellington House consisted of Lord Northcliffe, and Arnold Toynbee, according to John Coleman.
John Coleman, the author of the classic book Conspirators Hierarchy, The Committee of 300, was one of the the first writers to call attention to the existence of Tavistock, in 1969, and the rest as they say is history. Subsequently, we learn from Coleman’s work that polls were designed to not really measure public opinion, they were designed to shape public opinion.
One of the chief methods that unscrupulous polls use to report fake results is to select a biased sample. For example, if one is using phone samplings to gather voting preferences, one merely needs to target neighborhoods which historically favor one party over the other in order to get the predetermined results that one is looking for. This violates the principle of random selection of subjects to poll and this completely invalidates any survey results.

In Polling, The Fox Should Not Be Allowed to Watch the Hen House

There is yet another factor in the creation of fake polling results and that has to do with who is conducting the surveys and who owns the polling company through direct ownership or subsidiary holdings. For example, when CBS News conducts a survey, they are not going to work against their own organization. The Rockefellers used to own CBS directly. Today, through a complicated set of intertwining and overlapping boards of directorate and subsidiary holdings, their control over CBS is obfuscated from public view. Nevertheless, they still control CBS and every poll about this election from this organization must be viewed with suspicion. Why?
Rockefeller industries are some of the chief beneficiaries of the free trade agreements. David Rockefeller is permitted to close down American factories and unemploy millions of workers while seeking cheap labor in third world countries. His corporations are allowed to ship these foreign made products, laced with the blood of unemployed American workers, duty free. This is national economic suicide! And then here comes Donald Trump on his white horse, and he says he is going to tax these imports 35% in an attempt to keep American jobs in America. There is no way that CBS Polling is going to be allowed to report that Donald Trump is ever leading in the polls. The public opinion polls are designed to get the public to forsake Donald Trump on the premise that he cannot win. This is a conclusion fostered by trickery in the polling industry.
One can repeat this scenario over and over for each significant poll which is taken and and reported to the American people. Polls cannot be trusted!


Americans must be careful to not put any stock into public opinion polls. If America is survive any length of time, Hillary Clinton cannot be allowed to occupy the White House. Whether you like him or not, Trump will slow down the process of the globalist takeover of America. He is the only option to the immediate and complete tyrannical takeover of America. We must be careful to not let phony polling results influence our perceptions and efforts in supporting Donald Trump.

    Current date/time is Sun 21 Jan 2018, 2:10 pm