Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Federal Supreme confirms the constitutionality of the transfer of the departments and competencies o

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 280965
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Federal Supreme confirms the constitutionality of the transfer of the departments and competencies o Empty Federal Supreme confirms the constitutionality of the transfer of the departments and competencies o

    Post by Rocky Tue 12 Jun 2018, 5:00 am

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    Federal Supreme confirms the constitutionality of the transfer of the departments and competencies of some ministries to the provinces

    The Supreme Federal Court ruled on Tuesday the constitutionality of the transfer of sub-departments and the functions, functions and functions of some ministries to the provinces.
    "The Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the attendance of the judges of the members, and considered the appeal against the unconstitutionality of Article (12) of the Third Amendment Law of the Law of Governorates irregular in the region No. (21) for the year 2008 amended."
    He added that "the article contested unconstitutional included the transfer of sub-districts and organs, functions, services and competencies exercised by the ministries of municipalities and public works, reconstruction and housing, labor and social affairs, agriculture, finance, youth and sports, with allocations allocated to them in the budget and staff.
    He pointed out that "the Federal Supreme Court found that the article is consistent with the provisions of the Constitution and then returned the case because it is not based on the support of the Constitution."

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 280965
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°2

    Federal Supreme confirms the constitutionality of the transfer of the departments and competencies o Empty Federal confirms the constitutionality of the transfer of the departments and competencies of some m

    Post by Rocky Tue 12 Jun 2018, 5:52 am

    Federal confirms the constitutionality of the transfer of the departments and competencies of some ministries to the provinces
    June 12 2018 01:28 PM
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    [rtl][rtl]Federal Supreme Court[/rtl]
    [/rtl]
    Follow-Up
    [rtl]


    On Tuesday, the Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the attendance of the members of the judges. The appeal was considered unconstitutional of Article (12) of the Third Amendment Law for the Law of Non-Scheduled Governorates in Region No. (21) of 2008.

    The court's spokesman, Ayas al-Samuk, said that "the article challenging its unconstitutionality included the transfer of the sub-districts, organs, functions, services and competences exercised by the ministries of municipalities and public works, reconstruction and housing, labor and social affairs, agriculture, finance, youth and sports, , To the provinces.

    Samok pointed out that "the Federal Court found that the article is consistent with the provisions of the Constitution and then returned the case because it is not based on the support of the Constitution." 


    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    [/rtl]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Mon 18 Nov 2024, 4:40 pm