“Minister Al-Sadr” threatens the frame: Tomorrow will soon see him

[size=52]“Minister Al-Sadr” threatens the frame: Tomorrow will soon see him[/size]

[size=45]On Friday, Saleh Muhammad al-Iraqi, who is known as "Minister of al-Sadr", gave ten new reasons for the withdrawal of the leader of the Sadrist movement, Muqtada al-Sadr from the political process, while the coordinating framework vowed to say, "Tomorrow is near."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sadr’s minister said in a tweet, “Most of the Shiite political blocs were affiliated with (the Sadr family), if not all of them, so we offered them a candidate for prime minister, the son of their reference and their martyr, and they rejected him.”[/size]
[size=45]He added, "Those politicians or all of al-Sadr thought well of them ... betrayed him and backed into others, and some might imagine that the decision to withdraw is to hand Iraq over to the corrupt and consensual.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sadr’s minister explained that “our return to the elections after the withdrawal was for two important things: the first: normalization, and that has been criminalized.. The second: the criminalization of obscenity: (homosexuals) so let’s see what they do?! Is Siston a new and detailed law, especially with the escalation of Western colonial pressures against his opponents!?[/size]
[size=45]He explained, "Our withdrawal is to embarrass the opponents who have protested against the elections because they are fraudulent. Will they continue to form a government from fraudulent elections?! What will its legitimacy be!???!.. Will they agree with the normalizers and the Emiratis!?.. Will the missiles reach Anbar and Erbil?? ! And also to reveal the claimant of belonging to the October Revolution?! .. Who was the decision to withdraw the leader al-Sadr from the political process as a withdrawal for them from the revolution, demonstrations, storming Anbar, and the like.. Some of them even turned the goal of the demonstrations to support the consensus government.[/size]
[size=45]And he continued, "If al-Sadr remained insistent on forming a majority government, this would have lasted for several months or more. So what would the reaction of the blocs, the people and others would be!!?.. Perhaps that reminds us of the 8 months that al-Sadr delayed the arrival of (the leader of necessity) ) to the Prime Minister.. so they put the accusations against his Eminence and accused him of personal hostility and harming the people.”[/size]
[size=45]He explained, "Many thought that the demand for a majority government was a political struggle for power... We were never students of authority, but among you listened to lies," noting that "the withdrawal came with Shiite substitutes... Will it be the beginning of the strength of the sect?!" Or is it the beginning of looting money and suspicious deals? Or will the Dora refinery be stolen as the Baiji refinery was stolen before!??[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]