The judiciary is speaking today, claiming the dissolution of Parliament and attempts to represent Al

POSTED ON[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]The judiciary is speaking today, claiming the dissolution of Parliament and attempts to represent Al-Sadr in the “Roadmap” committee[/size]

[size=45]Baghdad / Tamim Al-Hassan[/size]
[size=45]Today, attention returns once again to the Federal Court on the issue of dissolving Parliament after postponing the pronouncement of the decision 4 times.[/size]
[size=45]On the other hand, attempts are being made to represent the Sadrists in the "road map" committee that emerged from the government palace meeting the day before yesterday.[/size]
[size=45]And the coordinating framework and the forces allied with it assume the resumption of parliament sessions after the visit of the Arbaeen of Imam Hussein, without forming a government.[/size]
[size=45]The differences within the Shiite bloc are slowing down the movement towards choosing a new government because of the objections of Muqtada al-Sadr, the leader of the Sadrist movement.[/size]
[size=45]The latter is still up to now on its refusal to negotiate with the political forces, or to form committees to prepare for the next stage.[/size]
[size=45]Close to the Sadrist movement confirmed in an interview yesterday with (Al-Mada) in the context of reactions to the recent "national dialogue" meeting that the leader of the movement: "refuses to sit with the corrupt or deal with committees produced by that political class."[/size]
[size=45]The meeting at the Government Palace last Monday announced the formation of a committee to study the re-election and change the law and the commission.[/size]
[size=45]Those close to al-Sadr added that "the leader of the Sadrist movement demanded the dissolution of parliament because this council, with its current formation, is unable to reform."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sadr had renewed, during the political summit at the Government Palace in Baghdad, which he boycotted for the second time, his famous phrase in which he refuses to submit to "Eastern or Western" agendas.[/size]
[size=45]It was understood from the timing of the new "tweet" that it came in response to leaks about the presence of foreign hands trying to take the political forces gathered to boycott the movement to another direction.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sadr said in a tweet yesterday on “Twitter”: “Continue to reform, no matter what happens. I and my companions are neither Eastern nor Western. He (Ibn Al-Dua’i) will not rule over us, whoever he is.” ».[/size]
[size=45]The leader of the current had expected his opponents to go to meet his demands to dissolve parliament after he intervened to stop the Green Zone clashes last week.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Sadr's minister considered after that that the demands for the resumption of parliament sessions were "impudent", before the coordination framework retreated and its convening was postponed until after the "Forty days" (dissolving after 10 days).[/size]
[size=45]This prompted the postponement to an implicit truce between the Sadrist movement and its opponents, but it is likely to be violated while awaiting the Federal Court's decision on dissolving Parliament.[/size]
[size=45]Today, the court is supposed to consider the case that has been postponed 4 times (one of which was due to the curfew last week following the events of Al-Khadra).[/size]
[size=45]Last month, Nassar al-Rubaie, Secretary-General of the Sadrist bloc, filed a lawsuit against the three presidencies to dissolve the House of Representatives for its fifth session, and oblige the President of the Republic to set a date for legislative elections in accordance with the provisions of Article 64/second of the constitution.[/size]
[size=45]The leader of the Sadrist movement, Muqtada al-Sadr, had called on the Supreme Judicial Council to dissolve parliament within a period not exceeding 20 August, and assigning the President of the Republic to set a date for early elections, but the Council responded to al-Sadr's request to dissolve parliament, saying: "He does not have this authority. ».[/size]
[size=45]The lawsuit included accusations of failing to elect a president of the republic and violating the constitutional timings for forming the new government.[/size]
[size=45]The coordinating framework, according to one of the leaders of the parties close to the Shiite bloc, tends to the fact that the Federalist's decision will recommend Parliament to dissolve itself.[/size]
[size=45]In an interview with Al-Mada, the leader close to Al-Attar said: "There is no legal basis for dissolving Parliament except what the constitution mentioned in Article 64, and therefore the court may go to recommend according to the known mechanisms for this procedure."[/size]
[size=45]Article 64 of the constitution states: “First: The Council of Representatives is dissolved, by an absolute majority of its members, at the request of one-third of its members, or a request from the Prime Minister and with the approval of the President of the Republic. The Council may not be dissolved during the period of questioning the Prime Minister.[/size]
[size=45]Second: The President of the Republic, upon dissolving the House of Representatives, shall call for general elections in the country within a maximum period of sixty days from the date of the dissolution.[/size]
[size=45]As for the decisions of the last meeting called by Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi, the leader says that: “All the forces that participated in the meeting will nominate their representatives in the technical committee.”[/size]
[size=45]The leader revealed "attempts and efforts by the political forces to place a representative of the Sadrist movement in the committee, which will study the mechanisms and timing of holding new elections, the method of financing the elections, and setting initial visions for a new election law and the replacement of the Commission."[/size]
[size=45]The second decision of the six contents concluded by the summit meeting emphasized the formation of a "technical team from various political forces." To mature common visions and ideas about the road map for a national solution, and to bring points of view closer; In order to reach «early elections, and achieve their requirements by reviewing the electoral law, and reconsidering the commission».[/size]
[size=45]In all cases, the leader of a party close to the "framework", who asked not to be named, confirms that "the political forces will proceed to hold parliament sessions after the Arbaeen visit, whether he accepts or rejects the Sadrist movement."[/size]
[size=45]And that «the upcoming parliamentary sessions will be concerned with the legislation of 25 deferred laws, and we will leave the issue of forming a government until after the understandings».[/size]
[size=45]The leader reveals that the existence of different views within the «framework» about proceeding with the formation of the government without the approval of the Sadrists, is what disrupts the understandings about this procedure.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]