Abdul-Mahdi: Economy transfer from the state to the community is a solution out of the crisis

Baghdad: Euphrates News} saw oil minister resigned Adel Abdul-Mahdi said Wednesday that "the state monopoly of all, not based on the national economy and social true will remain sharp conflict point .. and the solution to get out of a historic crisis, a historic solution is to move a lot of the economy State to society. "

Said Abdul-Mahdi said in a statement the agency {Euphrates News} received a copy of it today, "the sad appearances yesterday in the House of Representatives is not interpreted by personal factors only, not political precedence of the parties to the conflict factors, but we find motives fundamental conflict on the state itself. Struggle within the blocks and between the blocks. conflict between those who govern and not be judged. the state is the goal and the bottom line. not that her own security only political resolution, but because her hand the whole economy basically. the economy is today the most important factor in the power struggle, after the political previously is the most important factor. by becoming the forces opposing political spaces their own, it also has its own security. "

And he finished "The economy is what the state is still the source foundation and semi-sole. So intensified conflict on them, and took multiple interfaces. Who rules? Are political forces? Or independent? Or technocrats control? Um governs new people and displaced ex? And other issues of reform and quotas and corruption , scramble the panellists, and that reflect the whole -ovq Guenaatna- a serious failure to address historic delinquency, continued to build the same over the past half century, which saw most sources of wealth and its economic state hands. no conflicts and divisions and alliances social nature essentially is, as in other countries, where most of the sources of wealth and its economic However, various community and strength, but monopolized the state, a person or party or sect or quotas, the greatest wealth, and its economic. "

"After the completion of the mark the anniversary of the mark, Mr. Bahr al-Ulum in Najaf, we met a group of intellectuals and scientists from the Hawza. Ft brother, Barham Salih, an excellent overview of the prospects of Arab-Kurdish relationship. We had a contribution centered that every relationship needs to be the goal of collected and to the forces of carrying burdens. the aim of the opposition regime change period, a goal that was essential for large components suffered from dictatorship, sectarianism and racism. the goal politically basically, it allows convergence of forces differ ideologically, to exceed together the most complex obstacles, and eventually be able to accomplish its mission. the prize was a great, felt each component in the target historic achievement, worth for him to ally that provides concessions .. Vanbthag close alliance overcome all difficulties. But after the change, the continuity of the rentier state and deepen the monopoly of wealth, not dismantle the relations established between the components and the forces before the only change, not dismantling relations built on the basis of sectarian or nationalist all but dismantled the relations within each form a party, too. there is no longer a common goal only struggle for the most basic state sites. there is no longer a common unites us, but the conflict has become is our law. Vvkdna work ethic and rules, and has become the end justifies the means. We became lie easily .. and we drop the other easily .. and ally ourselves and agree easily .. and disagree and Nnhq easily .. Each of us believes that what he is doing is a service to the people and the principles advocated by, while we fell all in the circle of conflict void or the captives fatal quotas.

"The solutions are no longer a political foundation .. and agreements, any agreements, will not hold up because there is no real basis only have a conflict on the state, at the time and the system no longer accepts tyranny and monopoly .. this will remain questioning and conflict is basically not trust agreement .. and will advance, and brings voice, who owns more than any other conflict and yelling tools .. If we had won a "victory" or "progress" that would be a prelude to an agreement of others against him and remove him. "

And the "state monopoly of all, not based on the national economy and social true will remain sharp conflict point .. and the solution to get out of a historic crisis, a historic solution is to move a lot of the economy from the state to society .. society is more capacity, and more capable, does not stand up 22 bag but some 35 million jobs and more able to absorb all the forces, initiatives and ideas and theories .. and that takes the conflict and scramble and compete the forms contained in a social system that is able to collect antonyms in acceptable and coexisting social unit .. Unlike the state, which does not accept the division and destroy quotas, requires work unity and agreement to implement programs Mahddh.anthy