Kurdish researcher: The militias' power in Syria and Iraq is nearing its end

[size=52]Kurdish researcher: The militias' power in Syria and Iraq is nearing its end[/size]

[size=45]A Syrian Kurdish researcher confirmed, on Wednesday, that the PKK is in a permanent state of war with the political geography of Kurdistan and the Kurdistan national symbols, starting from the deception of historical names to the Peshmerga to the national flag, to the tearing of the Kurdish social fabric and the fabrication of false alternative identities and affiliations.[/size]
[size=45]Abdul Rahman Kloo said in an interview: “First of all, and before any talk, we have to clarify the nature and reasons for the presence of the PKK in western Kurdistan (Syrian Kurdistan) after 2011, as this party was living in a state of clinical death on the organizational side before this date, and its movement was severely disrupted. Almost completely after the Syrian-Turkish agreement in Adana in 1998 and the expulsion of Ocalan in 1999, and his inability had reached the point of paralysis, as he was not allowed at the time to establish his traditional ceremonies or even a tent for his martyrs, as for his cadres and sleeper cells were hiding behind the activities of the Kurdish political movement, and even During investigations or security confrontations, these cadres disavowed their allegiance to the PKK.”[/size]
[size=45]He added, “But as soon as the Syrian crisis began, the political equation in Syria on the internal and external levels entered another direction, as the pace of violence and counter-violence escalated in all Syrian regions with the beginning of 2012. The conflict with Sunni political Islam is on a separate track from the conflict with national, religious and sectarian minorities, and since the Kurdish issue was the common denominator of the countries that divided Kurdistan, these countries resorted to handing over the Kurdish file from the Syrian crisis to the PKK under inter-contracts paid in the form of crude oil according to relative partnership.[/size]
[size=45]Cloe explained that “the commander of the Quds Force in the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, Qassem Soleimani, directly supervised the operation, and the main objective of the agreement and those contracts was not to allow the national dimension of Kurdistan to extend from the south towards western Kurdistan in light of the Syrian chaos, meaning that invoking the PKK was primarily for the purposes of Military and security forces are used as a tool for a state of war and repression, not for a state of peace or administration, and that is why all powers were granted to practice terrorism against the Kurds in the Kurdish area of ​​the crisis (in all areas of the Kurdish presence in Aleppo and the countryside of Aleppo and in the rest of the Kurdish regions).[/size]
[size=45]And he added, “In the political aspect of this presence, it has a direct relationship with the nature of its tasks regarding the regionally agreed upon Kurdish file within the framework of a joint interim strategy for the crisis (Syrian, Turkish, Iranian), so one of his first job tasks was repression and liquidation of the cadres of the political movement and an attempt to abolish Political life and work to protect the Syrian borders from the side of the Kurdistan Region, even though his hypothetical enemy was on the Turkish side.[/size]
[size=45]"That is why it is wrong to address the political behavior of this organization in isolation from the policies of the countries that use it as their proxy in fighting the Kurds, and all attempts that deliberately go in this direction according to partisan criteria and calculations fall within the framework of attempts to legalize the relationship with Turkey and partnership with it in this aggression, because Turkey It represents the axis of rotation of the entire operation, and accordingly, it is not possible in any way to read the political action of this organization in isolation from its security tasks that determine its functional behavior.”[/size]
[size=45]He said: “Since this organization operates in the illegal areas of the crisis on the Kurdish side through dark room scenarios, it must necessarily be in contradiction to all the legitimate national and patriotic constants and be hostile to them, and in practice it is in a permanent state of war with the political geography of Kurdistan and national symbols. Kurdistan, from deceiving historical names to the Peshmerga to the national flag to the leader Barzani, to tearing the Kurdish community fabric and creating false alternative identities and affiliations, in other words, this organization has been fighting all subsidiaries of the Kurdish identity since 2012, that is, before the terrorist phenomenon of ISIS.”[/size]
[size=45]The Kurdish researcher stressed, “Forcing the Peshmerga to make statements contrary to their will and facts, and desecrating the Kurdistan flag from time to time and spreading poison and lies towards the Kurdistan Democratic Party, which and fighting the Kurdish identity in Shingal is nothing but the result of a functional practice that follows an agreed regional agenda, and we have to transcend understanding this equation. Which has become one of the postulates of Kurdish political understanding and to go back to reading the policies and projects of these countries, as they are the ones that have a control device (remote control) for the behavior of this organization.”[/size]
[size=45]Clough said: “Since the battle of the Kurds with the Ottoman-Safavid alliance is a battle of existence, so the dialectic of the relationship between the constants and elements of the permanence of this existence does not allow us to separate any of them from the other, as it does not accept division, and the Peshmerga is one of the most important existential constants that can change the political equation in favor of The Kurdistan National Liberation Movement, and for this reason, was not allowed to enter Western Kurdistan, because if it entered, it would change all regional and even international accounts in favor of the future of the Kurdish cause in Western Kurdistan.”[/size]
[size=45]He said that "the Syrian variable will not be immune to change in Iraq after the formation of a national majority government in the coming days, as it will result in a reduction of Iranian influence to a minimum throughout the region, and with it the work of the security machine of the Safavid-Ottoman alliance will be damaged, and the stronger presence will be for America's allies in Israel, Saudi Arabia, South Kurdistan and the Arab Gulf states, and the human geographical incubator of Western Kurdistan qualifies for a strong partnership with this alliance as a geo-strategic dimension complementing the American sphere of influence as a vital area.[/size]
[size=45]Abdul Rahman Clough concluded his speech by saying, "I think that the phase of militia power in Syria and Iraq is approaching its end, despite all the complications and future obstacles, as it will not change the constants of the American strategy in the Middle East[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]