Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    The Federal Court clarifies its decisions regarding Khor Abdullah and Kirkuk: the ruler and the rule

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 281403
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    The Federal Court clarifies its decisions regarding Khor Abdullah and Kirkuk: the ruler and the rule Empty The Federal Court clarifies its decisions regarding Khor Abdullah and Kirkuk: the ruler and the rule

    Post by Rocky Fri 06 Oct 2023, 5:11 am

    The Federal Court clarifies its decisions regarding Khor Abdullah and Kirkuk: the ruler and the ruled under the authority of law



    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    2023-10-06 04:49
    Share
    Font

    Shafaq News/ Today, Friday, the Federal Supreme Court clarified the details of its decision regarding the Khor Abdullah Agreement, and also pointed out that its decision regarding the Kirkuk Operations Command headquarters was based on the principle of maintaining the security situation.

    The president of the court, Judge Jassim Muhammad Abboud, said, “With regard to the Federal Court’s decision on the issue of Khor Abdullah, it is that the court saw that the law ratifying the agreement violates the provisions of Article 61/Fourth of the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq for the year 2005, and therefore it ruled that the ratification law is unconstitutional.” On the agreement, and did not delve into the technical field of this agreement, but rather ruled that the agreement was unconstitutional,” explaining that “the main motivation for ruling unconstitutional is that Clause Four required regulating the process of ratification of international agreements by a law enacted by a two-thirds majority of the members of the House of Representatives,” according to what the news agency reported. Al-Iraqiya (INA).

    He stated that “the Law on Ratification of International Agreements and Treaties No. 111 of 1979 was a law in effect at the same time that this agreement was ratified, but the validity of the law does not mean its implementation if it is in violation of the Constitution,” pointing out that “if this law is in violation of the Constitution, it remains In force, if it is appealed before the Federal Supreme Court and the court finds that the law violates the Constitution, it will be ruled unconstitutional or it will be repealed after the House of Representatives legislates an alternative law.
    He explained that "the court balanced the constitutionality of the law and Iraq's interest in being a founding and effective member of the League of Arab States and committed to its charter," pointing out that "under the constitution, Iraq is committed to building good neighborly relations with all neighboring countries."
    He pointed out that "this agreement does not have a significant impact on good neighborliness, as the historical relations between Iraq and neighboring countries are greater than that," explaining that "Iraq has historical and ancient relations with Kuwait, whether on the popular level or on the official level."
    He stated that "the defunct regime entered Kuwait in violation of all international norms and conventions and in violation of the principles of good neighbourliness. This does not mean that the Iraqi people committed the mistake committed by the defunct regime, but rather it was the mistake of the head of the regime, not the Iraqi people," pointing out that "the regime in At that time, he was an authoritarian individualist who believed that the state was embodied by its head, and he was the President of the Republic at that time, and he transformed citizens from subjects working in the interest of the state into subjects working in the interest of the regime in Iraq.
    He stated, "After 2003, the rulers and the ruled became in the same position with respect to the law, and therefore those who rule Iraq at the present time are not immune from the law. Rather, the law holds the ruler and the ruled accountable when the ruler and the ruled commit a mistake against the people and the country or a mistake that violates the law," noting that “This unique democratic system in Iraq has been able, since 2003 until now, to overcome many obstacles, and was able to build constitutional institutions, and is based on democratic principles in building the state,” pointing out that “there are many negatives, but at the present time Iraq is in a better situation than Many neighboring and non-neighboring countries in terms of the standard of living of individuals or democratic institutional structure.”
    He stated that "arranging financial consequences for Iraq regarding the Khor Abdullah Agreement is the responsibility of the government, and we support any effort or action in the interest of the people and Iraq, the stability of the country, and building good relations with all neighboring countries."

    Stopping the Kirkuk Operations Command headquarters
    The President of the Federal Court affirmed that “Kirkuk is an Iraqi governorate that includes Arabs, Kurds, and Turkmen, and coexistence between these nationalities is historic, human and national,” pointing out that “Kirkuk remains in this coexistence regardless of the circumstances surrounding Kirkuk, and it is an ancient governorate with its people and of supreme value due to its geographical location.”
    He pointed out that “when the Supreme Court took its decision to issue the state order regarding stopping the handover of the headquarters to one of the political parties, it started from the principle of maintaining the security situation and peaceful coexistence in Kirkuk, and not for another purpose that was promoted by some media outlets,” pointing out that “the Iraqi people He has full confidence that coexistence between nationalities in Kirkuk is historic and will continue.”
    He stressed: "We are with any national, popular government direction regarding Kirkuk," pointing out that "if the Federal Supreme Court sees that the decision is otherwise and leads to the same positive results, the court will move in the same direction, since its goal is to preserve security and the unity of the people of Kirkuk."
    He stated that "the government is making a great effort and in coordination with all political parties in Kirkuk, the issue of Kirkuk will be resolved in a national solution that satisfies all parties in Kirkuk," explaining that "Kirkuk represents Iraq and a national value for all nationalities, and all nationalities in Kirkuk are proud of their Iraqi nationalism."
    He pointed out that "Kirkuk is stable and this stability will remain in Kirkuk, and it is a result of stability in Iraq," pointing out that "Iraq will pass all these stages and a modern national civil state will be built in Iraq for all Iraqis based on valid citizenship and on the basis of providing services to all the Iraqi people." ".
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Wed 27 Nov 2024, 10:11 am