Two months after the end of the poll, 8% of the voter's vote was canceled and less than 2000 . were

[size=52]Two months after the end of the poll, 8% of the voter's vote was canceled and less than 2000 . were added[/size]

[size=45]Baghdad / Tamim Al-Hassan[/size]
[size=45]The process of checking the results of the elections that took place last October ended with the addition of 1,382 votes, and the cancellation of about 8% of the total votes.
These new numbers increased the seats of two alliances, and the loss of 3 parties, one of whom came out with a result of "zero seats".[/size]
[size=45]The problem arose two months after the delay in announcing the final results in 9 stations and an electoral center in two governorates, and a number of invalid papers and repeated voter fingerprints in 3 other governorates.[/size]
[size=45]The recent changes caused a new wave of rejection by some forces, in addition to the renewed rejection of the final results by the previous parties. So far, it is not known how long the Federal Court will take in the last step before the start of the fifth parliamentary session.[/size]
[size=45]The Electoral Commission confirmed, yesterday, that the final results of the parliamentary elections did not reach the Federal Supreme Court for approval so far. "The election results have not yet been sent to the Federal Court, and the commission is in the process of sending it, but the time has not been set yet," the commission's spokeswoman, Jumana Al-Ghalai, said in a press statement.[/size]
[size=45]She explained, "There is no legal period for ratifying the results from the Federal Court."[/size]
[size=45]The Electoral Commission announced the day before yesterday the final results of the parliamentary elections that took place on the tenth of last October, without a significant difference from the preliminary results.[/size]
[size=45]The commission said in a press conference that it investigated 1,436 electoral appeals, which led to the cancellation of the votes of entire electoral headquarters.[/size]
[size=45]The Commission confirmed that these appeals led to a change in the results of five seats, compared to what was announced in the preliminary results, for reasons such as repeating voting or writing incorrectly on the ballot paper. The number of canceled votes reached more than 721 thousand, which is equivalent to 8% of the total votes of 9 million and 629 thousand voters.[/size]
[size=45]The results did not change the share of the first winner in the elections, which is the Sadrist movement led by Muqtada al-Sadr, who won 73 seats. Al-Sadr responded, via the Twitter platform, minutes after the end of the press conference of the Electoral Commission, in which the final results of the October elections were announced. Al-Sadr wrote on his official page, on “Twitter”, in a hashtag of three words: “Thank you to the Election Commission.”[/size]
[size=45]Illegal result![/size]
[size=45]On the basis of the recent changes, the Kurdistan Democratic Party lost two seats, while the latter considered it an “illegal” act.[/size]
[size=45]The two seats went to the Kurdistan Alliance, which includes the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan and the Movement for Change (Goran) in two provinces.[/size]
[size=45]The coalition seats rose from 16 to 18, while the Democratic Party's seats went from 33 to 31.[/size]
[size=45]Harim Karim, a deputy in the last session of the National Union Party in Erbil, snatched a seat from his rival for the Democratic Party in the third constituency in the province.[/size]
[size=45]Harim, who lost in the constituency, his votes rose to 8920 votes, and his votes increased by 403 votes over Laila Akram within the Democratic Party, who got 8517 votes.[/size]
[size=45]Harem's result was changed from a loser to a winner in accordance with the decision of the Judicial Committee on Elections No. 1665 of 11/15/2021.[/size]
[size=45]According to the investigations of the judiciary, it was found that the fingerprints of the same voters were repeated in the third district in Erbil, which led to the cancellation of the results in the suspected stations. The second seat won by the Kurdistan Alliance and lost by the Democratic Party is in Nineveh, where Ronzi Ziyad took Abdul Salam Shaaban's seat in the second district. The difference between the candidates reached 961 votes, with the first collecting 8,183 votes compared to 7,222 votes for the other candidate.[/size]
[size=45]The last changes were made according to Resolution No. 1371 issued by the Judicial Authority on November 15, 2021, which is the second change on the same day.[/size]
[size=45]The reason for the amendment was that the results of the center (Wala Primary School) No. 131503 were not sent to the external storage unit (USB), which led to the fingerprints not being interrupted.[/size]
[size=45]According to these changes, Mahmoud Muhammad, a spokesman for the Kurdistan Democratic Party, confirmed on Tuesday that two parliamentary seats for the party had been illegally looted.[/size]
[size=45]The party's spokesman, Mahmoud Muhammad, said in a statement, "After announcing the final results of the elections... it became clear to us that two seats legally entitled to two candidates from our party were taken away in the governorates of Erbil and Nineveh."[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out that the Kurdistan Democratic Party will decide on its position, after a meeting that will be held by its political office, "regarding this illegal act."[/size]
[size=45]single seat[/size]
[size=45]In addition, the seats of the individual winning candidates fell to 43 seats after losing a seat to the Al-Fateh Alliance led by Hadi Al-Amiri.[/size]
[size=45]Rafiq Al-Salihi took the seat of the single winning candidate Haitham Al-Fahd in the fourth Basra constituency, by 14 votes.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Salihi's votes became 6,796 votes, compared to 6,782 votes for Al-Fahd.[/size]
[size=45]The change took place in accordance with Resolution No. 1079 of the judiciary on the same two previous dates for the candidates for the winners within the Kurdistan Alliance.[/size]
[size=45]The reasons for the amendment in the results were for not counting the votes of 5% of the electoral papers that were classified as invalid.[/size]
[size=45]These votes were in polling station No. 193602, inside stations No. 1 and 6, and in polling station No. 293701, in stations No. 2 and 7, in addition to station No. 1 in electoral center No. 293606.[/size]
[size=45]This is the second seat that was added to Al-Fateh after another seat it won in Kirkuk against the Turkmen Front, which emerged from the ranks of the emerging parties to the next parliament.[/size]
[size=45]Gharib Askar won the seat in the second district in Kirkuk by only one vote, as the first received 7,731 votes, compared to 7,730 votes for the only winner of the Turkmen Front, Sawsan Abdul Wahed.[/size]
[size=45]The change took place according to Judicial Council Decision No. 1659 on the same previous date for the fourth time.[/size]
[size=45]The reason for the amendment in the results of Askar and the other, the only winning woman from the Turkmen Front, was the failure to count electoral papers in the results acceleration device.[/size]
[size=45]The framework is not satisfied[/size]
[size=45]Despite the rise of Al-Fateh seats in light of these changes from 17 to 19 seats, the so-called “coordinating framework” that includes Shiite forces objecting to the election results and the coalition among them, rejected these amendments as well.[/size]
[size=45]In a press statement, Al-Attar stated: "We categorically reject the results of the current elections, as it has become clear and beyond any doubt that the Electoral Commission has prepared the election results in advance at the expense of the will of the Iraqi people."[/size]
[size=45]He added: “We confirm that the Electoral Commission and the judiciary did not deal seriously with the appeals file and in accordance with the applicable legal contexts. The evidence presented by the political forces and proven by the Commission’s blunders was sufficient to move towards comprehensive manual counting and sorting, or to make a clear change in the polling results at the very least. For example, the Commission contradicts the file of conformity rates. Once it talks about changes in the percentages, and then goes back to confirming the existence of 100% conformity.”[/size]
[size=45]He continued: "We renew our firm position based on evidence and documents that there is a major tampering in the poll results, which calls us to reject the current results and continue the lawsuit filed before the Federal Court to cancel the elections, while we hope the court will stay away from political influences and deal with objectivity, impartiality and fairness to the Iraqi masses and save their votes from being lost." . On the other hand, the framework also lost a seat after the Azm alliance headed by Khamis al-Khanjar managed to return the former Defense Minister Khaled al-Obeidi to the ranks of the winners.[/size]
[size=45]Al-Obaidi won only 3 votes in constituency No. 6 on the Rusafa side in Baghdad, after receiving 4,538 votes, compared to 4,535 votes for Abbas Hussein, a candidate for the National Contract Alliance led by the head of the PMF, Faleh al-Fayyad, who is part of the coordination framework. The amendments came in accordance with Judicial Council Decision No. 1634 on 11/21/2021, where electoral papers were neglected as invalid and valid votes for the winning candidate.[/size]
[size=45]Accordingly, the seats of the Azm alliance rose from 12 to 13, and the seats of the National Contract Alliance went down from 5 to 4 seats.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]