Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Legal expert: does not have a specific time period to appeal the law defining the mandates of the th

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 279252
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Legal expert: does not have a specific time period to appeal the law defining the mandates of the th Empty Legal expert: does not have a specific time period to appeal the law defining the mandates of the th

    Post by Rocky Thu 08 Aug 2013, 7:20 am

    Legal expert: does not have a specific time period to appeal the law defining the mandates of the three presidencies

    Thursday, 08 August / August 2013 12:26 | | |







    {Baghdad: Euphrates News} legal expert explained Abboud erythema that he "does not have a specific time period to challenge the lawdetermining the three states, but becomes effective after the decision.

    And erythema told {Euphrates News} Thursday that "a coalition of state law to file a lawsuit in the Federal Court on the House of Representatives to cancel this decision, "noting that" to now does not have a specific date of the pleading. "

    The States determine the law was voted on in parliament, but the coalition of state law made an appeal to the Federal Court, and the Court was rejected due to lack of formal requirements on the appeal because the appeal presented before the publication of the law in the Official Gazette.

    And erythema added that "the State of Law coalition has a point of view that the determination of the state void and contrary to the Constitution, and they now expect the Federal Court set aside . "

    It is noteworthy that determine the law defines the mandate of States three presidencies     بدورتين and retroactive and does not allow those who hold office for two terms to run for office again.

    And erythema continued by saying that "the Constitution does not specify the mandate period so this problem can not be solved because the constitution     neglected , but does not have a specific time for the period to challenge the law determining the three States, but the decisionbecomes effective after its release.

    He said the coalition of state law, this decision is contrary to the Constitution on the grounds that the mandate of the prime minister did not specify in the constitution while the rest of the blocks is of the view that the Constitution did not specify that the organization of work law to Aakhalv the Constitution. Ended 2 m



    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Fri 18 Oct 2024, 1:09 am