Home
Obama’s Justice Department Charges Menendez … But Not Reid
April 3rd, 2015 - 10:17 am
Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, right and former Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., left, in happier times, November of 2014. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
The Obama Justice Department has filed its much anticipated corruption indictment against Senator Robert Menendez. He is the New Jersey Democrat who, from his powerful senior seat on the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee, has vehemently opposed President Obama’s negotiations with the jihadist regime in Iran, as well as his outreach to Castro’s Cuba.
Two things about the Obama administration cannot be denied. First, the president is desperate to cut a deal with the mullahs on their nuclear program, so much so that he has erased virtually every red line he ever purported to draw and has not been shy about strong-arming naysayers, including our allies in Israel and France.
Second, the Obama’s Justice Department, which features the first attorney general in American history to be held in contempt of Congress (for obstructing the House’s investigation of the outrageous Fast & Furious scandal), is the most politicized in American history – practicing discriminatory law-enforcement that stays its hand against friends (see, e.g., its treatment of New Black Panther Party voter intimidation, Solyndra fraud, and the Obama 2008 campaign’s large-scale campaign finance violations) while punishing critics, scapegoats, and others who dare to cross the president (see, e.g., treatment of Dinesh D’Souza’s de minimis campaign finance violation; of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, producer of the anti-Muslim video the administration fraudulently blamed for the Benghazi massacre; and of Standard & Poor’s, squeezed for a $1.37 billion settlement in a retaliatory suit Justice filed after S&P downgraded the U.S. credit-rating).
Consequently, as discussed here at Ordered Liberty last month when Menendez called an extraordinary press conference to defend himself, it was reasonable to suspect that the impending indictment might be payback for defying the president on Iran – indeed, mocking the White House over talking points that, the senator said, read as if they’d been written in Tehran.
As I hastened to point out in that post, this was not an “either-or” scenario. That is, it is entirely possible both (a) that the administration is harassing Menendez and making an example of the wages of defiance, and (b) that Menendez is in fact guilty of crimes. Discriminatory law enforcement is rarely a matter of trumping up cases. It is more a matter of exploiting the gray areas of prosecutorial discretion. Dinesh D’Souza, for example, was undeniably guilty of campaign finance violations. Nevertheless, the Justice Department typically allows these to be settled by administrative fine … as it did in the case of the Obama 2008 campaign’s offenses. D’Souza, to the contrary, was singled out for a multiple felony prosecution, with the Justice Department aggressively pushing for a significant prison sentence (denied by the judge), even though D’Souza’s $15,000 violation was a pittance compared to the Obama campaign’s concealment of nearly $2 million in donations.
So now that Menendez and his heavyweight donor, Florida opthalmologist Salomon Melgen, have been indicted on 22 corruption counts (comprised of conspiracy, bribery, fraud and false statements charges), it is worth asking: Is Menendez being unfairly singled out for prosecution on conduct in the nature of “everybody does it”? In considering this question, it is worth focusing on that paragon of Beltway rectitude, Harry Reid, who makes an intriguing cameo appearance in the Menendez indictment.
Boiled down to its essence, the 68-page indictment charges Menendez with agreeing to accept “things of value” (expensive gifts, vacations, private plane trips, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in contributions) from Dr. Melgen in return for being influenced to use his powerful office for Melgen’s benefit. The charging instrument describes an unusually lavish donor-pol arrangement. Still, the choreography of pay-to-play contributor and pampered elected official – with the chorus line of connected lobbyists and eager-to-please staffers in between – is hardly atypical of Washington … which is why so many Americans hold their government in such contempt.
It will not be easy for Menendez to convince a jury that the whole indictment is a criminalization of ordinary (if grimy) politics. As I noted in the aforementioned post, there is a meretricious air to some of the allegations about free trips with multiple “guests” to Melgen’s luxury resort. Of less prurient interest but probably more legal significance to the corruption charges, Menendez is also accused of lying about the gifts he was receiving on the annual financial disclosure form senators are required to complete. Specifically, it is said that in every year from 2007 through 2011 he failed to disclose thousands of dollars worth of gifts from Melgen. Here, we must note in the Justice Department’s favor that it could have charged Menendez with a separate felony (with a potential of five years’ imprisonment) for every year, but contented itself with a single five-year felony count. (See Indictment, Count 22, pp. 65-66.)
Primarily, though, the case against Menendez centers on three instances of something very familiar: an elected representative intervening with government agencies on behalf of a donor. To wit, the senator is accused of: (1) browbeating executive agencies to back Melgen in a conflict with the Dominican Republic over a contract to provide screening of containers coming through Dominican ports; (2) supporting visa applications for Melgen’s girlfriends; and (3) pressuring the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to resolve favorably to Melgen an $8.9 million Medicare billing dispute.
Bear in mind that there is nothing illegal per se about an elected representative’s petitioning government agencies on behalf of a constituent or supporter. Nor is there anything illegal per se about an elected representative’s acting in a manner that favors a donor. In fact, support for the representative’s agenda is usually the reason a donor contributes.
Illegality arises only if there is a quid pro quo – an understanding that the donor extends benefits and the representative accepts them to influence the latter to do the former’s bidding. This meeting of the minds can be very difficult to prove. Menendez thus argues, as one might expect, that he has a longstanding family friendship with Melgen; that it is this relationship, not Menendez’s political muscle, that explains Melgen’s largesse. The senator would have us believe that he did not do for Melgen anything he does not routinely do for the voters who sent him to Washington to look out for their interests. Note that this is why Menendez’s lies on financial disclosure forms, if proved, will be critical to the case: If there was nothing untoward about the gifts, there was no reason to conceal them. Proof of consciousness of guilt can be the difference in a case that comes down to the defendant’s state of mind.
With all that said, let’s focus on the third of the interventions described above – the Medicare billing allegation. As outlined in the indictment (pp. 35-52), Melgen dramatically overcharged Medicare for injections of Lucentis. Under Food and Drug Administration guidelines, each vial of Lucentis is “single-use” – one dose for one eye of one patient – even though it contains “overfill” in case of spillage. Melgen, however, divided the contents of each vial into multiple doses, then billed Medicare as if each dose administered were a full vial. When Medicare caught on to the scheme and analyzed Melgen’s records for 2007 through 2008, it found overbillings to the tune of $8.9 million. For three years, Menendez made herculean efforts to weigh in with HHS on Melgen’s behalf, parroting various rationales offered by the doctor and his lobbyists in defense of his billing practices. The efforts proved fruitless at each administrative level and in each appeal process.
According to the indictment, a frustrated Menendez turned for help to his friend and fellow Democrat, then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, in March of 2012.
Using aides as intermediaries, Menendez kept Reid apprised of his futile pleas to and dissatisfaction with lower rungs of the HHS bureaucracy. Then, in July 2012, Reid personally interceded to arrange a meeting for Menendez with HHS’s then-Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. The indictment (at p. 49) explains that the meeting took place on August 2, 2012, and that Sebelius rebuffed Menendez.
Call me cynical, but it seems that while justice is blind, the Justice Department is anything but – it’s quite discriminating. For example, the indictment against Obama’s bête noir, Menendez, for corruptly pressuring HHS somehow manages to omit the teeny weeny detail that Reid, a key Obama ally, not only arranged the meeting with Sebelius but attended it – or, some might say, used his influence to pressure HHS.
Oh, but you’re thinking, there’s a difference: according to the indictment so carefully crafted by Obama’s Justice Department, Reid, unlike Menendez, was not bought and paid for by Melgen.
Really?
The indictment (beginning at p. 16) makes much of the fact that contemporaneous with the scheme to pressure HHS, Melgen made two contributions, totaling $600,000, for the benefit of Menendez’s reelection campaign. The donations were made to an entity called “Majority PAC.” But guess what the indictment doesn’t the tell you? Majority PAC was controlled by none other than … Harry Reid. It was run by former Reid staffers and the then-majority leader, far from concealing his intimate ties to it, wore them like a badge of honor.
With that in mind, let’s have a look at Melgen’s contributions: both the ones the indictment describes and the one that it conceals – ironically, much the way the Justice Department accuses Menendez of concealing Melgen’s largesse.
The indictment makes the Jesuitic assertion that Melgen’s $600K was “earmarked” for Menendez. Reid’s Majority PAC, however, was not a Menendez fund; it was, as the indictment notes in passing, “a Super PAC whose purpose was to protect and expand the Democratic majority in the U.S. Senate.” Regardless of how contributions were “earmarked,” the money could be channeled wherever Reid decided it needed to go to preserve his majority. (In this instance, Majority PAC did spend $582,000 on getting Menendez reelected.)
More saliently, Melgen did not contribute $600,000 to Majority PAC in 2012. He contributed $700,000.
The Justice Department charges (at p. 17) that, in 2012, a Melgen entity gave $300,000 to Majority PAC on June 1 and then “issued a second $300,000 check” on October 1. What they don’t tell you is that, in between, the same Melgen entity forked over another $100,000 to Majority PAC. Isn’t that interesting? The Justice Department, which takes pains (at pp. 9-13 of the indictment) to itemize, for example, a $356.80 steakhouse tab, an $890.70 plane ticket, and a $875.12 limo charge picked up by Melgen for Menendez, somehow decided it was not worth mentioning the additional $100,000 Melgen gave to the Reid-controlled super PAC.
And then there is the timing of this exorbitant donation: June 29, 2012. Under the sub-heading, “MENENDEZ Elevates His Advocacy on MELGEN’s Behalf to the Secretary of HHS” (p. 48), the indictment alleges that on July 10, 2012, Reid’s scheduler – not Menendez’s – “contacted HHS, stating that Senator 3 [i.e., Harry Reid, as he is described in the indictment] would like to have a meeting with the Secretary of HHS and Senator Menendez sometime in the next couple of weeks.” Subsequently, as noted above, the indictment describes the meeting at which Menendez browbeat Sebelius but elides mention of the fact that Reid was right there with him.
To summarize: if you just read what the Justice Department has chosen to include in its indictment, you would conclude that Menendez leaned heavily on Reid to get him a meeting with Sebelius (as if Menendez could not have gotten such a meeting on his own), and that Reid otherwise had nothing to do with the matter. But in reality, Melgen contributed $700,000 to a Reid-controlled super PAC, including $100,000, which was not “earmarked” for Menendez, just a few days before Reid, not Menendez, arranged the meeting with Sebelius – a meeting at which Reid accompanied Menendez knowing full well that the agenda was to plead on their deep-pocketed donor’s behalf.
If we are just considering the degree of unsavory conduct, the indictment unquestionably describes far more on Menendez’s part than on Reid’s. Furthermore, no one is accusing Reid of making false statements on disclosure forms, much less of the sort of salacious behavior Menendez is said to have engaged in with Melgen’s assistance.
But if we consider instead the kindof unsavory conduct outlined in the corruption charges – i.e., if we try to deduce the Obama Justice Department’s legal theory about the sort of actions that constitute a felony violation of laws barring public officials from accepting “things of value” in exchange for using their political influence – it is difficult, to say the least, to distinguish what Menendez has been indicted for doing from what Reid has done with apparent impunity.
The real difference, it seems, is prosecutorial discretion: Menendez, who has made himself a nuisance to Obama, has been charged by Obama’s Justice Department; Reid, a stalwart Obama supporter, has not. Observe, though, that there is just enough information in the indictment to put Reid on notice that the hammer could come down on him at any moment if, like Menendez or Standard & Poor’s, he were to cross the president.
To say nothing of the not so subtle message to every Washington pol who takes donations and petitions government on behalf of his donors: Whether such conduct is deemed politics-as-usual or indictable crime may just depend on the president’s indulgence.
Read more: http://pjmedia.com/andrewmccarthy/2015/04/03/obamas-justice-department-charges-menendez-but-not-reid/#ixzz3WeZvblP9
» Seminar in Tehran on sustainable trade with Iraq
» Al-Maliki to the British Ambassador: Iraq is preparing to hold local elections that will contribute
» Al-Sudani invites the Secretary of NATO to Baghdad.. The benefits of the relationship outweigh the c
» The former Minister of Resources responds to Al-Halbousi: Iraq does not need new dams because the cu
» Sudanese to his Kuwaiti counterpart: Iraq is committed to Security Council resolutions and the sover
» Al-Sudani confirms Iraq's efforts to pursue strategic relations with the United States
» The Foreign Minister reveals the date of Al-Sudani’s visit to the White House: I will meet Lavrov so
» Kurdish MP: The reactions of Baghdad and Erbil to the Turkish bombing do not rise to the level of de
» Politician: Al-Sudani focuses on 3 points during his stay in New York
» Foreign Ministry: Our relations with Russia remain strong despite the sanctions
» Parliamentary Finance reveals three determinants for passing the salary scale
» Returning more than five thousand dismissed politicians to service
» Parliamentary services: 5 new cities will be added during 2024
» Integrity announces the value of the funds saved last August
» Parliamentary Legal: Passing a general amnesty depends on political consensus
» Mosul Dam Administration: We did not notice any technical problem threatening its safety
» The United States confirms its support for the success of the Sudanese government’s “reform” steps.
» The dollar continues to rise against the dinar in Baghdad and Erbil
» The President of the Kurdistan Region congratulates the Union of Islamic Religious Scholars on the a
» A Kuwaiti parliamentarian demands the return of his country’s deposits with Iraq: amounting to $815
» Iraqi Central Auction: External remittances increased by 80% at the expense of cash sales
» The central bank sells more than $198 million in currency auction
» Planning: 84% completion of the Baghdad-Kirkuk entrance rehabilitation and maintenance project.
» Kuwait: $815 million total deposits of the Kuwaiti government with Iraq
» Demands for the construction of a navigation dam to stop water scarcity in Basra
» Expectations that the oil and gas law will be passed after the local elections
» Demands for the construction of a navigation dam to stop water scarcity in Basra
» Specialists: The path of development is the face of the country in the next stage
» Experts: Developing electronic automation will limit smuggling operations
» Economist: Promoting investment requires implementing comprehensive strategies
» Al-Sudani meets with American companies to support gas investments in Iraq
» Agriculture: Prices of local products are within normal rates
» Basra Electricity announces that there has been a power outage in a number of areas of the governora
» Postponing the start of the electrical connection between Iraq and Jordan
» In numbers... Integrity details the money that was detected, stopping its waste, and returning it du
» Parliamentary Oil: Federal Court decisions are binding on everyone
» Iraq suspends official working hours next Wednesday
» The importance of the development path compared to other new global economic corridors
» Parliament objects to the Sudanese government: It has no right to lend without consulting us
» Parliamentary Oil: The necessity of having understandings regarding the mechanism of extracting oil
» The Prime Minister calls on Norwegian companies to work in Iraq
» Procedures for resolving problems that may arise between governorates
» Experts: Developing electronic automation will limit smuggling operations
» Baghdad hosts a meeting of the Executive Committee of the Arab Parliament
» Experts: Developing electronic automation will limit smuggling operations
» November is the date for announcing industrial investment opportunities
» Dean of deferred laws
» International expert: Promoting investment requires implementing comprehensive strategies
» Dhi Qar Oil increases the number of producing wells
» Consumer reassurance
» Experts: The lack of revenues does not affect budget estimates
» Al-Sudani invites the Secretary-General of NATO to visit Baghdad
» Oil is declining and expectations of an interest rate hike in America erase the impact of the declin
» The Federal Court rejects a lawsuit against sending 700 billion dinars to the Kurdistan Region
» Iraq announces the disarmament of anti-Iranian groups
» British website: The chances of the development route are superior to the Indian corridor
» The rise of the dollar stifles the poor class as the return to school approaches
» Minister of Labor: 7 million, the number of people covered by social protection assistance in Iraq
» Can Iraq finally become an international center for the petrochemical industries?
» Iraq's revenues are 18% less than expected in the budget
» The Labor Party remains in Iraq at the request of Tehran against the SDF and America
» A Gulf-American statement stresses Iraq’s commitment to demarcating maritime borders
» Revitalized after the cancellation of the visa.. Pictures from Qom.. Iranians taste dalimiya and mas
» Ali Hatem: We have an old vendetta with Al-Sadr and the Sunni parties supported by Iran
» Al-Sudani: The government is in the process of reviewing the form of the relationship with the inter
» Al-Maliki: Iraq is witnessing the beginning of the launch of a major reconstruction campaign
» This year...the Sudanese intends to visit Russia
» Al-Samarrai: There is no way to change the service and living reality in Salah al-Din except by acti
» President Bafel Jalal Talabani calls on the judiciary to play its role in the issue of creating Hala
» Minister of Justice Dr. Khaled Shawani receives the French Ambassador to Iraq
» America renews its commitment to the Strategic Framework Agreement: We continue to train Iraqi force
» Dollar exchange rates in Iraqi markets
» A “mysterious” postponement of the start of the electrical connection between Iraq and Jordan.. Amma
» The Federal Court refuses to issue a “state order” to stop lending to the Kurdistan Regional Governm
» Sudani from New York: The government is in the process of reviewing the form of the relationship wit
» Sudanese at the Sustainable Development Summit: We plan to achieve the goal of “zero flare” for gas
» Announcing the Central Bank of Iraq transfer auction for a period of (14) day
» Withdrawal of the license of Akkad Company to mediate the sale and purchase of foreign currencies /
» Planning Is Discussing With China The Investment And Economic Opportunities Available In Iraq
» “It is expected.” A political analysis of America’s position in support of the Gulf regarding Khor A
» Iraq begins special measures to contain water scarcity.. Video
» It warned of “government confusion”.. Parliamentary Finance: Retirement Fund money was used to finan
» Between reducing the dollar and the food basket...what will the citizen choose?
» President Pavel: Solving financial problems and keeping employee salaries away from political proble
» President Bafel Jalal Talabani: We refuse to penetrate the country's borders under any pretext
» 9/19/23 Militia Man & Crew Iraq Dinar - Militia Man & Angel1 - Update on Iraq's Progress - Al-Suda
» Creadit Rating / Iraqi Dinar Revaluation News 2023 / Iqd JPMorgan
» Deputy: Controversial matters within state departments hinder the release of their allocations from
» Urgent.. {Al-Furat News} publishes the names of the fifth group of those new to the aid
» Mr. Al-Hakim and Talabani emphasize investing in stability to address the differences between Baghda
» From the United Nations podium... leaders of Islamic countries attack Europe for allowing the desecr
» Member of the Democratic Party: A new agreement between Baghdad and Erbil at the beginning of 2024
» Al-Moayad and a delegation from the World Bank discuss digital cooperation in reducing economic crim
» Politician: Barzani’s presence in Baghdad in conjunction with the American delegation was not a coin
» Economist: The US Treasury will place 4 other banks on the blacklist
» Vice: Traders’ refusal to enter the platform caused the dollar crisis
» “Restraining quotas”...a parliamentary proposal to merge education with higher education
» Türkiye is pursuing a hostile policy against Iraq... a blatant violation and sovereignty is “in the