Government performance monitoring committee reveals different figures

POSTED ON [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] BY [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[size=52]Government performance monitoring committee reveals different figures[/size]

[size=45]The government performance monitoring committee revealed that the government has announced different rates of completion.
[size=45]A member of the Committee to monitor government performance and strategic planning Mohammed Shia Sudanese in a press conference held in the House of Representatives, and the participation of members of the Committee, that "the Committee exercised its functions to monitor government performance in a transparent," indicating that "the Committee received and studied the report and compared what the government pledged within its program and what Provided by the accomplished ”.[/size]
[size=45]He continued, "Through our visits to the ministries and hosting some ministers, the Committee was keen to delay to give sufficient time and review the report," adding that "the government's commitment to its program and the commitment of Parliament to monitor performance is a positive step, and our goal of the assessment is to find out the reality of the situation and find out the causes of obstacles."[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out that the Sudanese Committee to monitor the implementation of the government program in the House of Representatives recorded its observations on the semi-annual report of the government:[/size]
[size=45]- The semi-annual completion rate in the opinion of the Committee is 36.5% and not 79% as the government said.[/size]
[size=45]- The program was not in line with the plans presented and this is one of the reasons for the diffraction in addition to the lack of fulfillment of the promised government remedies, whether to eliminate unemployment or control security and reform the situation of prisons and ration card and the situation of the displaced, which did not actually happen and did not find a tangible change.[/size]
[size=45]- We did not find real indicators of the percentages of achievement, and that what has been included as a check now are previous projects years ago and can not be considered completion rates for the current government such as breakwater and many other projects.[/size]
[size=45]- The report included the study of the reduction of oil areas and the end of traffic jams, but we found many differences between what is announced and what was actually applied on the ground.[/size]
[size=45]- There is no coordination between the work of the ministries or the case of integration between them, and the Ministry of Finance did not give financial allocations for many projects, causing the suspension of projects due to allocations.[/size]
[size=45]- The Government has not complied with Form 11 associated with project costs, which is an important reason for the lack of the report and the lack of transparency.[/size]
[size=45]- We noted that the vision that prevailed is the implementation of projects in the absence of a strategic vision without a healthy environment for what the citizen wants, and that the government did not commit to provide monthly reports of completion rates.[/size]
[size=45]- The government program was based on the theoretical framework and the practical framework was weak and the problems are still large and did not provide solutions to the problems of citizens such as housing, unemployment and poverty.[/size]
[size=45]- The program did not put steps to address the problems of the ration card and lack of medicines, as the program did not refer to freedom of opinion.[/size]
[size=45]- Most of the goals achieved are interim.[/size]


[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
[/size][/size]