The Federal Court rejects the objection to the validity of the membership of a representative
The [url=https://www.thebaghdadpost.com/ar/Story/t/2988/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85%D8%A9 %D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A9][size=13]Federal[/url] Supreme Court, on Sunday, challenged the objection to the validity of the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] deputy on the emirate, pointing out that its jurisdiction in this area is limited to the application of Article (52) of the Constitution.
"The Federal Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of judges of all members, and considered a lawsuit filed by the candidate, Najm Aboud Ghadhban, in which the speaker of the House of Representatives / in addition to his job," the court spokesman Ayas al-Samouk said in a statement.
He added Acommok, that " the plaintiff limited his case request a resolution required the plaintiff by the President of the House of Representatives / in addition to his job, he presented his appeal to challenge the health of the attic MP emirate; because it is the most entitled her seat parliament, in the first coming meeting of the House of [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] in which complements the two - thirds quorum and put paragraph objection to The agenda of each session of the Council, in implementation of the text (52 / first) of the Constitution.
He pointed out that "the Federal Supreme Court found that the plaintiff's request after the restriction of his claim related to administrative action concerning a specific challenge governing a constitutional article, which is Article (52 / first) of the Constitution," noting that "the court found that such action adapts as an administrative conduct Appeal by the court competent to hear administrative actions.
Al-Samouk pointed out that "the Federal Supreme Court confirmed that its jurisdiction in the application of the provisions of Article (52) of the Constitution is confined to the appeal submitted to the decision issued by the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] of [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] in accordance with its competence set forth in Article (52 / I) of the Constitution."
The Spokesman stressed that “the Court has confirmed that its judiciary has settled in several judgments on this direction, including the decision issued by the number (72 / Federal / 2019) on (23/9/2019)”, indicating that “the Federal Supreme Court, On the foregoing I found that the plaintiff's suit has to respond from the competent side, and ruled her response. ”
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]