The Sadrists refuse to negotiate with the coordination framework as one bloc

[size=52]The Sadrists refuse to negotiate with the coordination framework as one bloc[/size]

[size=45]Baghdad/ Firas Adnan[/size]
[size=45]The Sadrist movement continues its strong objection to negotiating with the coordination framework as a single political component, and insists on the possibility of dialogue with the blocs it described as the winners in the elections, in order to exclude the State of Law coalition from the majority that will form the government.[/size]
[size=45]This comes at a time when the Kurdistan Democratic Party refuses to hold the other components responsible for the differences within the Shiite political house. In contrast, the State of Law coalition saw that attempts to exclude it from the government carry foreign agendas, and waved a decision from the coordination framework to boycott the political process.[/size]
[size=45]The Federal Supreme Court had issued another decision against the demands of the coordination framework when it approved the first parliament session.[/size]
[size=45]Political analyst Manaf al-Moussawi said, "The tweet of the leader of the Sadrist movement, Muqtada al-Sadr, is clear that the doors of his movement are open to the desired blocs."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Moussawi added, "The national majority project has become fully featured after the Federal Supreme Court's decision on the constitutionality of the first parliament session and the legality of electing its presidency."[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out that "the understandings between the winning blocs in the elections, namely the Sadrist movement, the Azm and Progress alliance, and the Kurdistan Democratic Party have reached their final stages in reaching the constitutional threshold that qualifies to form a government as soon as possible."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Moussawi stated, "The issue is not easy, there are challenges," stressing that "any project for change should encounter obstacles that will be addressed during the coming period."[/size]
[size=45]And he noted, "The Sadrist movement has clarified its position on the government formation process in an irreversible way, in that it does not deal with the coordination framework, but rather winning political blocs that it can ally with, and achieve reform."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Moussawi stressed, "What the Sadrists are proposing does not take a partisan character, but rather approaches the masses, the demands of the demonstrators and the recommendations of the religious authority."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Moussawi believes, “Whoever objects to this project can go to the opposition as a positive thing to follow up on the executive performance; Because we will be facing a good leap in democratic performance.”[/size]
[size=45]And he added, "The boycott is an unacceptable option, and it could become a recurring norm that any political bloc will resort to in the future if it does not get what it aspires to."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Moussawi went on to say that "the threat of a boycott is intended to affect the next government, or to obstruct the Sadrist movement's project in the national majority."[/size]
[size=45]In addition, a member of the Kurdistan Democratic Party, Imad Baglan, spoke about “clear differences between the Sadrist movement and the State of Law coalition, and we are not part of it.[/size]
[size=45]And Baglan added, "The Kurdistan Democratic Party had to make a decision amid the continuing differences and not wait indefinitely, especially since there are constitutional deadlines by which they are obliged to choose presidencies and form the government, and therefore it was with the winning list in the elections, whose position enjoys centrality and unity."[/size]
[size=45]He finds, "Disputes between the Shiite forces are an internal matter for the political forces of the component, and the Kurds and Sunnis should not be held responsible."[/size]
[size=45]Baglan continues, "Our position is clear that we are committed to previous agreements, and the alliance that will form the majority appeared during the first session of Parliament, whose blocs voted on the Presidency."[/size]
[size=45]For his part, a member of the State of Law coalition, Abbas al-Maliki, said that "the insistence of some political forces - in reference to the Sadrist movement - to exclude forces in the coordinating framework comes based on external pressures."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Maliki added, "The coordinating framework decided not to participate in a government in which it is ineffective, and it refuses to be dictated by an opinion, and its position is unified and will not be subject to dissent."[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out that "the combined forces in the framework have a large area and a wide audience, and that the boycott is one of the options offered strongly because the real representation of the component is not to participate in a political process that wants to exclude large blocs."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Maliki stressed, "There is an agreement among some of the large political blocs from the other components not to go with the coordination framework if he wants to form a government."[/size]
[size=45]He pointed out, "The Sadrist movement went in another direction and does not want to reach an agreement with the coordination framework, and it claims to form a political majority government in an unrealistic attempt."[/size]
[size=45]Al-Maliki concluded, "The coordinating framework does not rely much on the negotiations, because the political scene is moving in another direction that is inconsistent with the public interest."[/size]
[size=45]The coordinating framework had issued a statement yesterday in which it affirmed the unity of its position and its rejection of what it considered exclusion, and affirmed that it either goes to the opposition or boycotts the political process.[/size]
[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]