Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    JFK Vs The Federal Reserve

    Neno
    Neno
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 10948
    Join date : 2012-12-17
    Age : 61
    Location : Lone Star State

    JFK Vs The Federal Reserve Empty JFK Vs The Federal Reserve

    Post by Neno Tue 02 Apr 2013, 2:59 pm

    JFK Vs The Federal Reserve Newlog_o




    JFK Vs The Federal Reserve
    By John P. Curran
    4-19-7



    On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree,
    Executive Order 11110, was signed with the
    authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan
    money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke
    of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve
    Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively
    researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress.
    We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed,
    amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms,
    it is still valid.

    When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of
    Profiles in Courage -signed this Order, it returned to the federal government,
    specifically the Treasury Department, the Constitutional power to create
    and issue currency -money - without going through the privately owned Federal
    Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 [the full text
    is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority:
    "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver,
    or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This means that for every
    ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce
    new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held
    there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought
    into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States
    Notes were never circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department
    when Kennedy was assassinated. It appears obvious that President Kennedy
    knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the purported legal currency
    were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of America.

    "United States Notes" were issued as an interest-free
    and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury.
    We compared a "Federal Reserve Note" issued from the private
    central bank of the United States (the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal
    Reserve System), with a "United States Note" from the U.S. Treasury
    issued by President Kennedy's Executive Order. They almost
    look alike, except one says "Federal Reserve Note" on the top
    while the other says "United States Note". Also, the Federal
    Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while
    the United States Note has a red seal and serial number.

    President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963
    and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of
    circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency
    of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all
    U.S. paper "currency" circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve
    Notes.

    Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States
    Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for
    Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN
    was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic
    value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from
    reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in
    federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President
    were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government
    the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve
    Banks and being charged interest to create new "money". Executive
    Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own
    money backed by silver and realm value worth something.

    Again, according to our own research, just five months
    after Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 "Silver
    Certificates" were issued either, and they were subsequently removed
    from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to all
    future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve's control
    over the creation of money. It seems very apparent that President Kennedy
    challenged the "powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance".
    With true patriotic courage, JFK boldly faced the two most successful vehicles
    that have ever been used to drive up debt:

    1) war (Viet Nam); and,

    2) the creation of money by a privately owned central
    bank. His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined
    with Executive Order 11110 would have destroyed the profits
    and control of the private Federal Reserve Bank.


    Executive Order 11110

    AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING
    TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE
    TREASURY. By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title
    3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

    SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19,
    1951, as amended, is hereby further amended - (a) By adding at the end
    of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): "(j) The authority
    vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May
    12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates
    against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury
    not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to
    prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard
    silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption,"
    and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof. SECTION
    2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any
    right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in
    any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such
    liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had
    not been made.

    JOHN F. KENNEDY THE WHITE HOUSE, June 4, 1963


    Once again, Executive Order 11110 is still valid. According
    to Title 3, United States Code, Section 301 dated January 26, 1998:

    Executive Order (EO) 10289 dated Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R.
    9499, was as amended by:

    EO 10583, dated December 18, 1954, 19 F.R. 8725;

    EO 10882 dated July 18, 1960, 25 F.R. 6869;

    EO 11110 dated June 4, 1963, 28 F.R. 5605;

    EO 11825 dated December 31, 1974, 40 F.R. 1003;

    EO 12608 dated September 9, 1987, 52 F.R. 34617

    The 1974 and 1987 amendments, added after Kennedy's 1963
    amendment, did not change or alter any part of Kennedy's EO 11110. A search
    of Clinton's 1998 and 1999 EO's and Presidential Directives
    has also shown no reference to any alterations, suspensions, or changes
    to EO 11110.

    The Federal Reserve Bank, a.k.a Federal Reserve System,
    is a Private Corporation. Black's Law Dictionary defines the "Federal
    Reserve System" as: "Network of twelve central banks to which
    most national banks belong and to which state chartered banks may belong.
    Membership rules require investment of stock and minimum reserves."
    Privately-owned banks own the stock of the FED. This was explained in more
    detail in the case of Lewis v. United States, Federal Reporter, 2nd Series,
    Vol. 680, Pages 1239, 1241 (1982), where the court said: "Each Federal
    Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its
    region. The stock-holding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank's
    nine member board of directors".

    The Federal Reserve Banks are locally controlled by their
    member banks. Once again, according to Black's Law Dictionary, we find
    that these privately owned banks actually issue money:

    "Federal Reserve Act. Law which created Federal
    Reserve banks which act as agents in maintaining money reserves, issuing
    money in the form of bank notes, lending money to banks, and supervising
    banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board (q.v.)".

    The privately owned Federal Reserve (FED) banks actually
    issue (create) the "money" we use. In 1964, the House Committee
    on Banking and Currency, Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, at the second
    session of the 88th Congress, put out a study entitled Money Facts which
    contains a good description of what the FED is: "The Federal Reserve
    is a total money-making machine. It can issue money or checks. And it never
    has a problem of making its checks good because it can obtain the $5 and
    $10 bills necessary to cover its check simply by asking the Treasury Department's
    Bureau of Engraving to print them".

    Any one person or any closely knit group who has a lot
    of money has a lot of power. Now imagine a group of people who have the
    power to create money. Imagine the power these people would have.
    This is exactly what the privately owned FED is!

    No man did more to expose the power of the FED than Louis
    T. McFadden, who was the Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in
    the 1930s. In describing the FED, he remarked in the Congressional Record,
    House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932:

    "Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the
    most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal
    Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board,
    a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and
    he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national
    debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board
    and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough
    money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution
    has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted
    itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this
    through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve
    Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control
    it".

    Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United
    States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions, departments,
    or agencies. They are private credit monopolies which prey
    upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and
    their foreign customers. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully
    placed upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe and who repaid
    us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions.

    The FED basically works like this: The government granted
    its power to create money to the FED banks. They create money, then loan
    it back to the government charging interest. The government levies income
    taxes to pay the interest on the debt. On this point, it's interesting
    to note that the Federal Reserve Act and the sixteenth amendment, which
    gave congress the power to collect income taxes, were both passed in 1913.
    The incredible power of the FED over the economy is universally admitted.
    Some people, especially in the banking and academic communities, even support
    it. On the other hand, there are those, such as President John Fitzgerald
    Kennedy, that have spoken out against it. His efforts were spoken about
    in Jim Marrs' 1990 book Crossfire:"

    Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform
    American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning
    to the constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate
    money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest
    to the bankers of the Federal Reserve System, who print paper money then
    loan it to the government at interest. He moved in this area on June 4,
    1963, by signing Executive Order 11110 which called for the issuance of
    $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather
    than the traditional Federal Reserve System. That same day, Kennedy signed
    a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar bills from silver to
    gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.

    Kennedy's comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon,
    had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time,
    encouraging broader investment and lending powers for banks that
    were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had
    decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general
    obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks".

    In a comment made to a Columbia University class on Nov.
    12, 1963,

    Ten days before his assassination, President John Fitzgerald
    Kennedy allegedly said:

    "The high office of the President has been used
    to foment a plot to destroy the American's freedom and before I leave office,
    I must inform the citizen of this plight."

    In this matter, John Fitzgerald Kennedy appears to be
    the subject of his own book... a true Profile of Courage.

    This research report was compiled for Lawgiver. Org.
    by Anthony Wayne

    What is the Federal Reserve Bank?

    What is the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) and why do we
    have it?

    by Greg Hobbs November 1, 1999

    The FED is a central bank. Central banks are supposed
    to implement a country's fiscal policies. They monitor commercial banks
    to ensure that they maintain sufficient assets, like cash, so as to remain
    solvent and stable. Central banks also do business, such as
    currency exchanges and gold transactions, with other central banks.
    In theory, a central bank should be good for a country, and they might
    be if it wasn't for the fact that they are not owned or controlled by the
    government of the country they are serving. Private central banks, including
    our FED, operate not in the interest of the public good but for profit.

    There have been three central banks in our nation's history.
    The first two, while deceptive and fraudulent, pale in comparison to the
    scope and size of the fraud being perpetrated by our current FED. What
    they all have in common is an insidious practice known as "fractional
    banking."

    Fractional banking or fractional lending is the ability
    to create money from nothing, lend it to the government or someone else
    and charge interest to boot. The practice evolved before banks existed.
    Goldsmiths rented out space in their vaults to individuals and merchants
    for storage of their gold or silver. The goldsmiths gave these "depositors"
    a certificate that showed the amount of gold stored. These certificates
    were then used to conduct business.

    In time the goldsmiths noticed that the gold in their
    vaults was rarely withdrawn. Small amounts would move in and out but the
    large majority never moved. Sensing a profit opportunity, the goldsmiths
    issued double receipts for the gold, in effect creating money (certificates)
    from nothing and then lending those certificates (creating debt) to depositors
    and charging them interest as well.

    Since the certificates represented more gold than actually
    existed, the certificates were "fractionally" backed by gold.
    Eventually some of these vault operations were transformed into banks and
    the practice of fractional banking continued.

    Keep that fractional banking concept in mind as we examine
    our first central bank, the First Bank of the United States (BUS). It was
    created, after bitter dissent in the Congress, in 1791 and chartered for
    20 years. A scam not unlike the current FED, the BUS used its control of
    the currency to defraud the public and establish a legal form of usury.

    This bank practiced fractional lending at a 10:1 rate,
    ten dollars of loans for each dollar they had on deposit. This misuse and
    abuse of their public charter continued for the entire 20 years of their
    existence. Public outrage over these abuses was such that the charter was
    not renewed and the bank ceased to exist in 1811.

    The war of 1812 left the country in economic chaos, seen
    by bankers as another opportunity for easy profits. They influenced Congress
    to charter the second central bank, the Second Bank of the United States
    (SBUS), in 1816.

    The SBUS was more expansive than the BUS. The SBUS sold
    franchises and literally doubled the number of banks in a short period
    of time. The country began to boom and move westward, which required money.
    Using fractional lending at the 10:1 rate, the central bank and their franchisees
    created the debt/money for the expansion.

    Things boomed for a while, then the banks decided to
    shut off the debt/money, citing the need to control inflation. This action
    on the part of the SBUS caused bankruptcies and foreclosures. The banks
    then took control of the assets that were used as security against the
    loans.

    Closely examine how the SBUS engineered this cycle of
    prosperity and depression. The central bank caused inflation by creating
    debt/money for loans and credit and making these funds readily available.
    The economy boomed. Then they used the inflation which they created as
    an excuse to shut off the loans/credit/money.

    The resulting shortage of cash caused the economy to
    falter or slow dramatically and large numbers of business and personal
    bankruptcies resulted. The central bank then seized the assets used
    as security for the loans. The wealth created by the borrowers
    during the boom was then transferred to the central bank during the
    bust. And you always wondered how the big guys ended up with
    all the marbles.

    Now, who do you think is responsible for all of the ups
    and downs in our economy over the last 85 years? Think about the depression
    of the late '20s and all through the '30s. The FED could have pumped lots
    of debt/money into the market to stimulate the economy and get the country
    back on track, but did they? No; in fact, they restricted the money supply
    quite severely. We all know the results that occurred from that action,
    don't we?

    Why would the FED do this? During that period asset values
    and stocks were at rock bottom prices. Who do you think was buying everything
    at 10 cents on the dollar? I believe that it is referred to as consolidating
    the wealth. How many times have they already done this in the last 85 years?

    Do you think they will do it again?

    Just as an aside at this point, look at today's economy.
    Markets are declining. Why? Because the FED has been very liberal with
    its debt/credit/money. The market was hyper inflated. Who creates inflation?
    The FED. How does the FED deal with inflation? They restrict the debt/credit/money.
    What happens when they do that? The market collapses.

    Several months back, after certain central banks said
    they would be selling large quantities of gold, the price of gold fell
    to a 25-year low of about $260 per ounce. The central banks then bought
    gold. After buying at the bottom, a group of 15 central banks announced
    that they would be restricting the amount of gold released into the market
    for the next five years. The price of gold went up $75.00 per ounce in
    just a few days. How many hundreds of billions of dollars did the central
    banks make with those two press releases?

    Gold is generally considered to be a hedge against more
    severe economic conditions. Do you think that the private banking families
    that own the FED are buying or selling equities at this time? (Remember:
    buy low, sell high.) How much money do you think these FED owners have
    made since they restricted the money supply at the top of this last current
    cycle?

    Alan Greenspan has said publicly on several occasions
    that he thinks the market is overvalued, or words to that effect. Just
    a hint that he will raise interest rates (restrict the money supply), and
    equity markets have a negative reaction. Governments and politicians do
    not rule central banks, central banks rule governments and politicians.
    President Andrew Jackson won the presidency in 1828 with the promise to
    end the national debt and eliminate the SBUS. During his second term President
    Jackson withdrew all government funds from the bank and on January 8, 1835,
    paid off the national debt. He is the only president in history to have
    this distinction. The charter of the SBUS expired in 1836.

    Without a central bank to manipulate the supply of money,
    the United States experienced unprecedented growth for 60 or 70 years,
    and the resulting wealth was too much for bankers to endure.
    They had to get back into the game. So, in 1910 Senator Nelson Aldrich,
    then Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, in collusion with representatives
    of the European central banks, devised a plan to pressure and deceive Congress
    into enacting legislation that would covertly establish a private central
    bank.

    This bank would assume control over the American economy
    by controlling the issuance of its money. After a huge public relations
    campaign, engineered by the foreign central banks, the Federal Reserve
    Act of 1913 was slipped through Congress during the Christmas recess, with
    many members of the Congress absent. President Woodrow Wilson, pressured
    by his political and financial backers, signed it on December 23, 1913.

    The act created the Federal Reserve System, a name carefully
    selected and designed to deceive. "Federal" would lead one to
    believe that this is a government organization. "Reserve" would
    lead one to believe that the currency is being backed
    by gold and silver. "System" was used in lieu of the word "bank"
    so that one would not conclude that a new central bank
    had been created.

    In reality, the act created a private, for profit, central
    banking corporation owned by a cartel of private banks. Who owns the FED?
    The Rothschilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers
    of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg of Germany;
    and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman, Sachs and the Rockefeller
    families of New York.

    Did you know that the FED is the only for-profit corporation
    in America that is exempt from both federal and state taxes? The FED takes
    in about one trillion dollars per year tax free! The banking families listed
    above get all that money.

    Almost everyone thinks that the money they pay in taxes
    goes to the US Treasury to pay for the expenses of the government. Do you
    want to know where your tax dollars really go? If you look at the back
    of any check made payable to the IRS you will see that it has been endorsed
    as "Pay Any F.R.B. Branch or Gen. Depository for Credit U.S. Treas.
    This is in Payment of U.S. Oblig." Yes, that's right, every dime you
    pay in income taxes is given to those private banking families, commonly
    known as the FED, tax free.

    Like many of you, I had some difficulty with the concept
    of creating money from nothing. You may have heard the term "monetizing
    the debt," which is kind of the same thing. As an example, if the
    US Government wants to borrow $1 million ó the government does borrow
    every dollar it spends ó they go to the FED to borrow the money.
    The FED calls the Treasury and says print 10,000 Federal Reserve Notes
    (FRN) in units of one hundred dollars.

    The Treasury charges the FED 2.3 cents for each note,
    for a total of $230 for the 10,000 FRNs. The FED then lends the $1 million
    to the government at face value plus interest. To add insult to injury,
    the government has to create a bond for $1 million as security for the
    loan. And the rich get richer. The above was just an example, because in
    reality the FED does not even print the money; it's just a computer entry
    in their accounting system. To put this on a more personal level, let's
    use another example.

    Today's banks are members of the Federal Reserve Banking
    System. This membership makes it legal for them to create money from nothing
    and lend it to you. Today's banks, like the goldsmiths of old, realize
    that only a small fraction of the money deposited in their banks is ever
    actually withdrawn in the form of cash. Only about 4 percent of all the
    money that exists is in the form of currency. The rest of it is simply
    a computer entry.

    Let's say you're approved to borrow $10,000 to do some
    home improvements. You know that the bank didn't actually take $10,000
    from its pile of cash and put it into your pile? They simply went to their
    computer and input an entry of $10,000 into your account. They created,
    from thin air, a debt which you have to secure with an asset
    and repay with interest. The bank is allowed to create and lend as much
    debt as they want as long as they do not exceed the 10:1 ratio imposed
    by the FED.

    It sort of puts a new slant on how you view your friendly
    bank, doesn't it? How about those loan committees that scrutinize you with
    a microscope before approving the loan they created from thin air. What
    a hoot! They make it complex for a reason. They don't want you to understand
    what they are doing. People fear what they do not understand. You are easier
    to delude and control when you are ignorant and afraid.

    Now to put the frosting on this cake. When was the income
    tax created? If you guessed 1913, the same year that the FED was created,
    you get a gold star. Coincidence? What are the odds? If you are going to
    use the FED to create debt, who is going to repay that debt? The income
    tax was created to complete the illusion that real money had been lent
    and therefore real money had to be repaid. And you thought Houdini was
    good.

    So, what can be done? My father taught me that you should
    always stand up for what is right, even if you have to stand up alone.

    If "We the People" don't take some action now,
    there may come a time when "We the People" are no more. You should
    write a letter or send an email to each of your elected representatives.
    Many of our elected representatives do not understand the FED. Once informed
    they will not be able to plead ignorance and remain silent.

    Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically
    says that Congress is the only body that can "coin money and regulate
    the value thereof." The US Constitution has never been amended to
    allow anyone other than Congress to coin and regulate currency.

    Ask your representative, in light of that information,
    how it is possible for the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the Federal
    Reserve Bank that it created, to be constitutional. Ask them why this private
    banking cartel is allowed to reap trillions of dollars in profits without
    paying taxes. Insist on an answer.

    Thomas Jefferson said, "If the America people ever
    allow private banks to control the issuance of their currencies, first
    by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will
    grow up around them will deprive the people of all their prosperity until
    their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

    Jefferson saw it coming 150 years ago. The question is,
    "Can you now see what is in store for us if we allow the FED to continue
    controlling our country?"


    "The condition upon which God hath given liberty
    to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude is
    at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt."

    John P. Curran

    Source: http://www.roc-grp.org/jfk.html

    http://rense.com/general76/jfkvs.htm


    Last edited by Neno on Tue 02 Apr 2013, 3:08 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : fixed link)
    Neno
    Neno
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 10948
    Join date : 2012-12-17
    Age : 61
    Location : Lone Star State

    JFK Vs The Federal Reserve Empty Re: JFK Vs The Federal Reserve

    Post by Neno Tue 02 Apr 2013, 3:00 pm

    President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963
    and the United States Notes he had issued were immediately taken out of
    circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve as the legal currency
    of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of all
    U.S. paper "currency" circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve
    Notes.
    Is this why he was Killed?
    Neno
    Neno
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 10948
    Join date : 2012-12-17
    Age : 61
    Location : Lone Star State

    JFK Vs The Federal Reserve Empty Re: JFK Vs The Federal Reserve

    Post by Neno Thu 04 Apr 2013, 10:38 am

    "United States Notes" were issued as an interest-free
    and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury.
    Can you imagine this happening again? More like WHEN... ;)
    Neno
    Neno
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 10948
    Join date : 2012-12-17
    Age : 61
    Location : Lone Star State

    JFK Vs The Federal Reserve Empty Re: JFK Vs The Federal Reserve

    Post by Neno Thu 04 Apr 2013, 10:43 am

    Ask your representative, in light of that information,
    how it is possible for the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the Federal
    Reserve Bank that it created, to be constitutional. Ask them why this private
    banking cartel is allowed to reap trillions of dollars in profits without
    paying taxes. Insist on an answer.
    The banking cartel, we all know that is:

    he Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase,
    Citigroup and Wells Fargo) own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil,
    Royal Dutch/Shell, BP and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank,
    BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths. But their
    monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil
    patch.

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/25080
    Neno
    Neno
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 10948
    Join date : 2012-12-17
    Age : 61
    Location : Lone Star State

    JFK Vs The Federal Reserve Empty Re: JFK Vs The Federal Reserve

    Post by Neno Thu 04 Apr 2013, 10:45 am

    The International Banking Cartel



    To Big to Sell,
    To Big to Jail!
    Neno
    Neno
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 10948
    Join date : 2012-12-17
    Age : 61
    Location : Lone Star State

    JFK Vs The Federal Reserve Empty Re: JFK Vs The Federal Reserve

    Post by Neno Thu 04 Apr 2013, 11:14 am

    You want to understand the system you live in, spend 25 minutes watching the above video. If you don't then hopefully you already know. This is the reason fro everything around you other than GOD.

    Now, I am hearing certain elements pertaining to all this from many many years ago to present that I can not really say rather true or not, that is fixing to trigger a GLOBAL RESET. All I got to say about it, for now.
    Neno
    Neno
    Admin
    Admin


    Posts : 10948
    Join date : 2012-12-17
    Age : 61
    Location : Lone Star State

    JFK Vs The Federal Reserve Empty Re: JFK Vs The Federal Reserve

    Post by Neno Thu 04 Apr 2013, 4:08 pm

    Want a really get a bigger picture, this is 3 1/2 hours long but hey, it will teach you howThe Money Masters - How International Bankers Gained Control of America.


    .. ;)



    The above was done in 1996, this piece was published on May 3 1012 with
    only 2868 views, I was 2869 and learned so much during the 3 1/2 hour
    video. I see why only a few views cause everyone is brainwashed. We need
    the debt free US Notes and do not need the Federal Reserve or a Gold
    Standard. We need Monetary Reform YESTERDAY!!.... Twisted Evil


    Published on May 3, 2012




    The Money Masters explains the
    history behind the current world depression and the bankers' goal of
    world economic control by a very small coterie of private bankers, above
    all governments.

    "The purpose of this financial crisis is to
    take down the U.S. dollar as the stable datum of planetary finance and,
    in the midst of the resulting confusion, put in its place a Global
    Monetary Authority [GMA - run directly by international bankers freed of
    any government control] -a planetary financial control organization"
    -Bruce Wiseman

    "Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in
    sin. The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them
    the power to create money, and with the flick of the pen they will
    create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from
    them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought
    to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in.
    But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of
    your own slavery, let them continue to create money." -- Sir Josiah
    Stamp, Director of the Bank of England (appointed 1928). Reputed to be
    the 2nd wealthiest man in England at that time.

    For more information and videos from the creators of this documentary, visit:
    http://www.themoneymasters.com

    BEST EDUCATION I HAVE WATCH IN A LONG TIME!!

    Sponsored content


    JFK Vs The Federal Reserve Empty Re: JFK Vs The Federal Reserve

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Tue 26 Nov 2024, 1:11 am