Appeals Court: Illegal Aliens Have Right to Own Guns
by Ken Klukowski30 Aug 2015Washington, D.C.11,076
The Second Amendment provides that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” In a seminal 2008 case, the Supreme Court held in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment secures an individual right to keep and bear arms. On August 20, 2015, Chief Judge Diane Wood (a liberal appointee of Bill Clinton who was on Barack Obama’s short-list for the Supreme Court) wrote for a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit that the panel could “see no principled way to carve out the Second Amendment and say that [illegal aliens] are excluded” from exercising Second Amendment rights.
The court’s opinion admitted, “some of Heller’s language does link Second Amendment rights with the notions of ‘law-abiding citizens’ and ‘members of the political community.’” But then the court incorrectly claims that Heller also “supports the opposite result: that all people, including non-U.S. citizens, whether or not they are authorized to be in the country, enjoy at least some rights under the Second Amendment.” The Seventh Circuit noted that three other federal appeals courts have said that illegal aliens do not have Second Amendment rights, but concluded that those courts were wrong, creating what lawyers call a “circuit split” by holding that § 922(g)(5) is unconstitutional.
But the court went on to sustain the indictment that led to Meza-Rodriguez’s conviction, with an analysis that’s bad news for gun owners. Chief Judge Wood wrote that while illegal aliens are entitled to Second Amendment rights, gun restrictions such as this one should only be subject to what courts call “intermediate scrutiny,” under which the court can uphold this statute, but also uphold a great many additional restrictions on the right to bear arms.
It’s true that the Supreme Court has noted that the term “the people” also shows up in the First and Fourth Amendments, and that Heller noted that gun rights were in some ways similar to free-speech rights. (In fact, I authored a legal scholarly work, “Making Second Amendment Law with First Amendment Rules,” published by Nebraska Law Review, that explains the relationship between these two parts of the Constitution’s Bill of Rights.)
But as the Seventh Circuit admitted, other uses of “the people” in the Constitution—such as Article I, Section 2’s provision that members of Congress shall be elected every two years “by the People of the several States,” and the Seventeenth Amendment’s provision that senators will be elected in each state “by the People thereof”—clearly refer only to voting citizens, though even then the court tries to maintain some wiggle room by saying this is only “likely.”
Even cases where the Supreme Court has interpreted “the people” differently do not support the Seventh Circuit’s interpretation. For example, in U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez, the High Court held that “the people” in the Bill of Rights includes only noncitizens who have “developed a sufficient connection with this country to be considered part of [the national] community,” such as permanent legal residents. The Court specifically contrasted the foreigner in that case from illegal aliens, saying that legal residents such as Mr. Verdugo-Urquidez “were in the United States voluntarily and had accepted some societal obligations.”
This panel could have chosen between two meanings of “the people”: one referring only to American citizens, and the other also including some (but not all) noncitizens. It freely chose to reject the argument that the right to bear arms is a special right that the Constitution promises to citizens eligible to vote. And the court also invoked one of the two wrongheaded decisions at the heart of the birthright citizenship immigration debate—Plyler v. Doe—where liberal Justice William Brennan slipped into a footnote in a 5-4 decision a nonbinding comment that states have no rational basis for treating legal aliens differently from illegal aliens.
The Chicago-based appeals court concluded, “No language in the Amendment supports such a conclusion, nor, as we have said, does a broader consideration of the Bill of Rights.”
The court is wrong. The Declaration of Independence says that in order to be legitimate, government must be by the consent of the governed, and that when the people of a nation withdraw their consent, the people have the right to “alter or abolish” that government.
The Constitution designed America’s democratic republican form of government to incorporate these principles. Adult citizens of this country have a fundamental right to vote, and this is the means by which citizens express their consent to be governed by certain people for a certain time. Then during the next election, those citizens again have the right to use their vote to withdraw their consent, and to alter their current government by electing new people.
As discussed in my law review article, the Supreme Court in Heller found that the reason the Second Amendment was written into the Constitution’s Bill of Rights was so that the American people could throw off a tyrannical regime that took power against the vote of the people, and held onto that power through military might. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the Supreme Court that “fear that the federal government would disarm the people in order to impose rule through [the military] was pervasive,” and that armed citizens “are better able to resist tyranny.” The right to remove from power such a regime is a power that the Constitution reserves to the voting citizens of this country, not to foreigners, and especially not to foreigners who are not even in this country legally.
This does not mean that foreigners should not be able to own firearms, as I explain both in my Nebraska Law Review work and also in another academic publication, “Citizen Gun Rights.” The Second Amendment secures a right to self-defense, and foreigners in this country—especially permanent lawful residents—have the same human concerns regarding their personal safety and the security of their families, homes, and businesses that any other human being might have. This simply means that Congress and state legislatures can decide when and how a foreigner in this country can have firearms, instead of it being a constitutional guarantee to be decreed by the courts.
The Seventh Circuit’s decision is manifestly wrong for other reasons as well. For one, it casts doubt on the legality of the federal law that says a person must be an adult to purchase a firearm from a store. Political rights—such as the right to vote or the right to serve on a jury—only apply to adult citizens. But personal rights—such as First Amendment rights to free speech or Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable police searches—can also be claimed and exercised by children. A fourth-grade student has a First Amendment right to pray over her lunch at school or to tell her teacher that her favorite hero is Jesus, but only an insane person would suggest that fourth-grader has a constitutional right to buy a gun.
In conclusion, the Seventh Circuit’s decision is disturbing for two reasons. One, it diminishes the value of American citizenship and muddies the water in multiple areas of law and public policy by ignoring the vital distinction the Constitution makes between adult American citizens as opposed to foreigners (especially illegal aliens). And second, it degrades the Second Amendment into a right that can be regulated far more heavily—and thus carries much less force—than other fundamental rights.
The federal government cannot appeal this decision, because in the end it won its case by affirming the district court’s decision not to dismiss the case against Meza-Rodriguez. So unfortunately, unless this criminal asks the Supreme Court to review his case, this case will stay on the books for some time, working mischief to the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding American citizens.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/30/appeals-court-illegal-aliens-have-right-to-own-guns/
by Ken Klukowski30 Aug 2015Washington, D.C.11,076
Illegal aliens can now claim Second Amendment rights to own guns in violation of federal law, according to a federal appeals court that completely ignored the primary reason for the right to bear arms: to give Americans citizens the right to remove a tyrannical regime from power.
Mariano Meza-Rodriguez is an illegal alien from Mexico who was carrying ammunition for a .22-caliber firearm when he was arrested in 2013. He has been here since his parents brought him around age five. But federal law, found at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5), makes it a crime for an illegal alien to have a gun. He was convicted, sentenced to time served, then deported to Mexico. He is appealing the federal district court’s decision not to dismiss his indictment that led to his conviction.The Second Amendment provides that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” In a seminal 2008 case, the Supreme Court held in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment secures an individual right to keep and bear arms. On August 20, 2015, Chief Judge Diane Wood (a liberal appointee of Bill Clinton who was on Barack Obama’s short-list for the Supreme Court) wrote for a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit that the panel could “see no principled way to carve out the Second Amendment and say that [illegal aliens] are excluded” from exercising Second Amendment rights.
The court’s opinion admitted, “some of Heller’s language does link Second Amendment rights with the notions of ‘law-abiding citizens’ and ‘members of the political community.’” But then the court incorrectly claims that Heller also “supports the opposite result: that all people, including non-U.S. citizens, whether or not they are authorized to be in the country, enjoy at least some rights under the Second Amendment.” The Seventh Circuit noted that three other federal appeals courts have said that illegal aliens do not have Second Amendment rights, but concluded that those courts were wrong, creating what lawyers call a “circuit split” by holding that § 922(g)(5) is unconstitutional.
But the court went on to sustain the indictment that led to Meza-Rodriguez’s conviction, with an analysis that’s bad news for gun owners. Chief Judge Wood wrote that while illegal aliens are entitled to Second Amendment rights, gun restrictions such as this one should only be subject to what courts call “intermediate scrutiny,” under which the court can uphold this statute, but also uphold a great many additional restrictions on the right to bear arms.
It’s true that the Supreme Court has noted that the term “the people” also shows up in the First and Fourth Amendments, and that Heller noted that gun rights were in some ways similar to free-speech rights. (In fact, I authored a legal scholarly work, “Making Second Amendment Law with First Amendment Rules,” published by Nebraska Law Review, that explains the relationship between these two parts of the Constitution’s Bill of Rights.)
But as the Seventh Circuit admitted, other uses of “the people” in the Constitution—such as Article I, Section 2’s provision that members of Congress shall be elected every two years “by the People of the several States,” and the Seventeenth Amendment’s provision that senators will be elected in each state “by the People thereof”—clearly refer only to voting citizens, though even then the court tries to maintain some wiggle room by saying this is only “likely.”
Even cases where the Supreme Court has interpreted “the people” differently do not support the Seventh Circuit’s interpretation. For example, in U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez, the High Court held that “the people” in the Bill of Rights includes only noncitizens who have “developed a sufficient connection with this country to be considered part of [the national] community,” such as permanent legal residents. The Court specifically contrasted the foreigner in that case from illegal aliens, saying that legal residents such as Mr. Verdugo-Urquidez “were in the United States voluntarily and had accepted some societal obligations.”
This panel could have chosen between two meanings of “the people”: one referring only to American citizens, and the other also including some (but not all) noncitizens. It freely chose to reject the argument that the right to bear arms is a special right that the Constitution promises to citizens eligible to vote. And the court also invoked one of the two wrongheaded decisions at the heart of the birthright citizenship immigration debate—Plyler v. Doe—where liberal Justice William Brennan slipped into a footnote in a 5-4 decision a nonbinding comment that states have no rational basis for treating legal aliens differently from illegal aliens.
The Chicago-based appeals court concluded, “No language in the Amendment supports such a conclusion, nor, as we have said, does a broader consideration of the Bill of Rights.”
The court is wrong. The Declaration of Independence says that in order to be legitimate, government must be by the consent of the governed, and that when the people of a nation withdraw their consent, the people have the right to “alter or abolish” that government.
The Constitution designed America’s democratic republican form of government to incorporate these principles. Adult citizens of this country have a fundamental right to vote, and this is the means by which citizens express their consent to be governed by certain people for a certain time. Then during the next election, those citizens again have the right to use their vote to withdraw their consent, and to alter their current government by electing new people.
As discussed in my law review article, the Supreme Court in Heller found that the reason the Second Amendment was written into the Constitution’s Bill of Rights was so that the American people could throw off a tyrannical regime that took power against the vote of the people, and held onto that power through military might. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the Supreme Court that “fear that the federal government would disarm the people in order to impose rule through [the military] was pervasive,” and that armed citizens “are better able to resist tyranny.” The right to remove from power such a regime is a power that the Constitution reserves to the voting citizens of this country, not to foreigners, and especially not to foreigners who are not even in this country legally.
This does not mean that foreigners should not be able to own firearms, as I explain both in my Nebraska Law Review work and also in another academic publication, “Citizen Gun Rights.” The Second Amendment secures a right to self-defense, and foreigners in this country—especially permanent lawful residents—have the same human concerns regarding their personal safety and the security of their families, homes, and businesses that any other human being might have. This simply means that Congress and state legislatures can decide when and how a foreigner in this country can have firearms, instead of it being a constitutional guarantee to be decreed by the courts.
The Seventh Circuit’s decision is manifestly wrong for other reasons as well. For one, it casts doubt on the legality of the federal law that says a person must be an adult to purchase a firearm from a store. Political rights—such as the right to vote or the right to serve on a jury—only apply to adult citizens. But personal rights—such as First Amendment rights to free speech or Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable police searches—can also be claimed and exercised by children. A fourth-grade student has a First Amendment right to pray over her lunch at school or to tell her teacher that her favorite hero is Jesus, but only an insane person would suggest that fourth-grader has a constitutional right to buy a gun.
In conclusion, the Seventh Circuit’s decision is disturbing for two reasons. One, it diminishes the value of American citizenship and muddies the water in multiple areas of law and public policy by ignoring the vital distinction the Constitution makes between adult American citizens as opposed to foreigners (especially illegal aliens). And second, it degrades the Second Amendment into a right that can be regulated far more heavily—and thus carries much less force—than other fundamental rights.
The federal government cannot appeal this decision, because in the end it won its case by affirming the district court’s decision not to dismiss the case against Meza-Rodriguez. So unfortunately, unless this criminal asks the Supreme Court to review his case, this case will stay on the books for some time, working mischief to the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding American citizens.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/30/appeals-court-illegal-aliens-have-right-to-own-guns/
Today at 5:17 am by Rocky
» utube 11/11/24 MM&C News Reporting-IRAQ-USA-Financial Inclusion up 48%-Money Inside & Out of Iraq
Today at 5:16 am by Rocky
» Al-Mandlawi to the UN envoy: The supreme authority diagnosed the problems and provided solutions for
Today at 5:15 am by Rocky
» Saleh: Government strategy to boost gold reserves as part of asset diversification
Today at 5:14 am by Rocky
» Prime Minister's advisor rules out oil price collapse: Trump's policy will not sacrifice petrodollar
Today at 5:09 am by Rocky
» Tripartite alliance between Iraq, Egypt and Jordan to boost maritime trade
Today at 5:06 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary Committee reveals date of entry into force of Personal Status Law
Today at 5:03 am by Rocky
» Al-Fatah warns against US blackmail and Trump's intentions for the next stage
Today at 5:02 am by Rocky
» A leader in the law: If the Americans do not leave on their own two feet, we will expel them in fune
Today at 5:00 am by Rocky
» MP: Next Sunday's session will witness the passing of "important laws"
Today at 4:59 am by Rocky
» There is a financial aspect.. Al-Zaidi rules out voting on the real estate law
Today at 4:57 am by Rocky
» "Promising" economic opportunities in central Iraq open doors to investment, trade and unemployment
Today at 4:55 am by Rocky
» Minister of Transport: Arab interest in the development road project
Today at 4:53 am by Rocky
» Bitcoin Fails to Maintain Its Meteoric Rise
Today at 4:51 am by Rocky
» Amending the retirement age on the parliament's table.. This is the latest that has been reached
Today at 4:50 am by Rocky
» Launching the Health Unit Initiative in Iraqi Schools
Today at 4:49 am by Rocky
» Will Iraq be the savior of the countries of the region if oil prices fall?
Today at 4:48 am by Rocky
» Regarding electrical energy.. Government moves to meet the needs of next summer
Today at 4:47 am by Rocky
» {Retirement age} sparks debate in parliament
Today at 4:46 am by Rocky
» Minister of Transport to {Sabah}: Arab interest in the development road project
Today at 4:45 am by Rocky
» Planning: Two important pre-census activities start today and tomorrow
Today at 4:43 am by Rocky
» Next week.. contracting with 2500 applicants on a {contract} basis
Today at 4:42 am by Rocky
» Service Effort: Opening 30 projects in agricultural areas next month
Today at 4:41 am by Rocky
» The House of Representatives issues a clarification regarding its tenders and official invitations
Today at 4:36 am by Rocky
» Issuance of (3000) new decisions for politically dismissed employees and non-employees
Today at 4:34 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani discusses cooperation in the field of energy and development of the oil and gas sector wit
Today at 4:32 am by Rocky
» Trade: Transferring 400 billion dinars to pay farmers’ dues for the remaining wheat for the northern
Today at 4:31 am by Rocky
» Iranian Minister of Trade and Industry Injured During Trip to Kurdistan
Today at 4:29 am by Rocky
» Chairman of the Integrity Commission: Corruption negatively affects reconstruction and development a
Today at 4:28 am by Rocky
» Strengthening judicial cooperation on the table of Judge Zidane and his Turkish counterpart
Today at 4:26 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani directs the Ministry of Oil to communicate with Shell to implement projects that serve Ira
Today at 4:25 am by Rocky
» One of them is "protocol".. A politician determines the extent of the difference between Al-Sudani's
Today at 4:24 am by Rocky
» Iraq confirms its keenness to support OPEC unity to ensure oil price stability
Today at 4:22 am by Rocky
» It may drop to 40%.. Al-Kanani warns of a sharp drop in oil and directs an urgent call to the govern
Today at 4:21 am by Rocky
» Distribution next week.. The region will receive nearly 533 billion dinars to finance its employees’
Today at 4:20 am by Rocky
» Iraq expresses interest in cooperating with major international oil companies
Today at 4:19 am by Rocky
» Criticism follows the performance of the Minister of Foreign Affairs in international positions.. Wi
Today at 4:18 am by Rocky
» Al-Mashhadani's election "embarrassed him"... Will Al-Sudani implement the ministerial reshuffle?
Today at 4:14 am by Rocky
» Will the "dollar crisis" topple the central bank governor?
Today at 4:11 am by Rocky
» The Oil and Gas Law Returns to the Forefront... Will Al-Sudani Be Able to Resolve the Disputes Over
Today at 4:09 am by Rocky
» Oil Licenses in Basra: An Environmental Disaster That Raises Cancer Rates and Suffocates the Populat
Today at 4:08 am by Rocky
» Iraq begins intensive campaign to deport illegal foreign workers and regulate the labor market
Today at 4:06 am by Rocky
» Government advisor explains Baghdad Metro project specifications and confirms its continuation witho
Today at 4:05 am by Rocky
» Al-Mashhadani to the 188 Alliance delegation: The best solution is to give people the freedom to cho
Today at 4:04 am by Rocky
» Parliamentarian: Ambassadors and representatives of foreign missions came to Parliament to prevent t
Today at 4:03 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani's advisor reveals the reasons for the lack of gold in the government's reserves
Today at 4:02 am by Rocky
» New fortifications close the most dangerous border gaps between Iraq and Syria
Today at 4:01 am by Rocky
» "Baghdad breathes a sigh of relief" .. Closing of 144 illegal factories that emit toxins into the ai
Today at 4:00 am by Rocky
» Iraqi oil prices continue to decline amid global price decline
Today at 3:59 am by Rocky
» “The War of Leaks” Confuses the Political Scene... Blackmail or Expose of Corruption?
Today at 3:56 am by Rocky
» Government sends budget amendment to resolve differences with region
Today at 3:55 am by Rocky
» More than 800 “dual-job” employees work at Najaf Airport
Today at 3:54 am by Rocky
» Slight rise in dollar prices against the dinar in Iraqi stock exchanges
Today at 3:49 am by Rocky
» Where did the parliamentary discussions on the "retirement age" reach?
Today at 3:48 am by Rocky
» The region "mobilizes" for the first census in 37 years: It will increase the budget share and the n
Today at 3:47 am by Rocky
» "Thousands of them are suspended" .. Draft laws challenge the remainder of the life of the current p
Yesterday at 5:00 am by Rocky
» Population, oil and salaries...hot files in the meeting between Al-Sudani and Barzani
Yesterday at 4:56 am by Rocky
» Political attempts to obstruct it.. Personal Status Law on its way to legislation
Yesterday at 4:54 am by Rocky
» MP: Al-Sudani has reached the conviction of the necessity of removing some ministers
Yesterday at 4:53 am by Rocky
» Central Bank announces progress in dollar control procedures
Yesterday at 4:49 am by Rocky
» Baghdad.. Closing 144 informal metal smelting factories to reduce pollution
Yesterday at 4:47 am by Rocky
» Private Banks Association: Iraq to adopt advanced trade finance system by end of 2024
Yesterday at 4:46 am by Rocky
» Severe imprisonment for former Minister of Transport for deliberately violating his job duties
Yesterday at 4:44 am by Rocky
» 4 new pharmaceutical factories
Yesterday at 4:43 am by Rocky
» Iraq's move to attract $250 billion in investments welcomed
Yesterday at 4:40 am by Rocky
» Financial inclusion and banking restructuring
Yesterday at 4:39 am by Rocky
» Iraq records 4% economic growth, moves towards sustainable diversification
Yesterday at 4:38 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani and Barzani discuss finding solutions to common issues "according to the constitution"
Yesterday at 4:33 am by Rocky
» Requesting Iraqi mediation.. US delegation arrives in Baghdad to follow up on the "hotline" with Teh
Yesterday at 4:32 am by Rocky
» Iraqi oil continues to decline for the third day in a row
Yesterday at 4:31 am by Rocky
» Population census in Iraq: social and political importance and a major challenge for the government
Yesterday at 4:30 am by Rocky
» Next Thursday.. the start of the first phase of the census
Yesterday at 4:28 am by Rocky
» 11 international companies compete to operate Faw Port
Yesterday at 4:27 am by Rocky
» Baghdad conveys Trump's message to Tehran: Stop proxy wars... and confirms removing the opposition f
Yesterday at 4:24 am by Rocky
» Iraq contracts to purchase defense systems and helicopters
Yesterday at 4:23 am by Rocky
» Has Al-Sudani's government succeeded in keeping the fire away from Iraq?
Yesterday at 4:22 am by Rocky
» Justice announces the Ministry of Finance’s approval to appoint contract employees in all judicial d
Yesterday at 4:20 am by Rocky
» Expert: Traders’ dealings with sanctioned markets trigger demand for dollars on the black market
Yesterday at 4:19 am by Rocky
» Anbar.. Al-Waleed District summarizes the completed and under-construction projects for the current
Yesterday at 4:17 am by Rocky
» A government delegation reviews the work stages and completion rates at Nasiriyah International Airp
Yesterday at 4:16 am by Rocky
» Al-Mashhadani to the Sovereignty Bloc delegation: The necessity of turning the page on differences b
Yesterday at 4:15 am by Rocky
» Al-Hasnawi: Iraq will benefit from green climate funds to improve the environment
Yesterday at 4:14 am by Rocky
» New decisions approved by the Council of Ministers during today's session
Yesterday at 4:12 am by Rocky
» The Chairman of the Trade Bank of Iraq reveals to Alsumaria the interest rate on loans
Yesterday at 4:10 am by Rocky
» The 10 cheapest countries to pay electricity and gas bills.. Where is Iraq?
Yesterday at 4:07 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani and Nechirvan Barzani at one table in Erbil
Yesterday at 4:06 am by Rocky
» Here are the dollar prices in the Iraqi stock exchanges
Yesterday at 4:04 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary Committee Reveals to Alsumaria Latest Developments in Israeli Violation of Iraqi Airsp
Yesterday at 4:02 am by Rocky
» The largest of its kind in Iraq.. Launching a pioneering medical conference for professional develop
Yesterday at 4:01 am by Rocky
» A source explains the circumstances of transferring 75% of the Ministry of Interior’s civilian emplo
Yesterday at 3:59 am by Rocky
» Weapons are becoming more "loose" and the Interior Ministry is "politicizing"
Yesterday at 3:58 am by Rocky
» Government messages to citizens regarding the population census in Iraq
Yesterday at 3:56 am by Rocky
» What is Iraq's ranking in the Artificial Intelligence Index?
Yesterday at 3:54 am by Rocky
» utube 11/9/2 MM&C News Reporting-Sudani Art IV IMF-Port Faw Open-CBI Governor-No Room for Tw
Tue 12 Nov 2024, 7:08 am by Rocky
» Finance Committee discusses revenue enhancement and investment budget allocations with governors
Tue 12 Nov 2024, 7:06 am by Rocky
» His advisor: Al-Sudani's visit to Kurdistan focuses on these files
Tue 12 Nov 2024, 7:03 am by Rocky
» Al-Tamimi explains the importance of the real estate return law
Tue 12 Nov 2024, 7:02 am by Rocky
» MP: The administrative capital is a project under study and 2025 is the decision date
Tue 12 Nov 2024, 7:01 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary Planning: Al-Sudani's government has not achieved what it pledged in its program
Tue 12 Nov 2024, 6:59 am by Rocky