Appeals Court: Illegal Aliens Have Right to Own Guns
by Ken Klukowski30 Aug 2015Washington, D.C.11,076
The Second Amendment provides that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” In a seminal 2008 case, the Supreme Court held in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment secures an individual right to keep and bear arms. On August 20, 2015, Chief Judge Diane Wood (a liberal appointee of Bill Clinton who was on Barack Obama’s short-list for the Supreme Court) wrote for a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit that the panel could “see no principled way to carve out the Second Amendment and say that [illegal aliens] are excluded” from exercising Second Amendment rights.
The court’s opinion admitted, “some of Heller’s language does link Second Amendment rights with the notions of ‘law-abiding citizens’ and ‘members of the political community.’” But then the court incorrectly claims that Heller also “supports the opposite result: that all people, including non-U.S. citizens, whether or not they are authorized to be in the country, enjoy at least some rights under the Second Amendment.” The Seventh Circuit noted that three other federal appeals courts have said that illegal aliens do not have Second Amendment rights, but concluded that those courts were wrong, creating what lawyers call a “circuit split” by holding that § 922(g)(5) is unconstitutional.
But the court went on to sustain the indictment that led to Meza-Rodriguez’s conviction, with an analysis that’s bad news for gun owners. Chief Judge Wood wrote that while illegal aliens are entitled to Second Amendment rights, gun restrictions such as this one should only be subject to what courts call “intermediate scrutiny,” under which the court can uphold this statute, but also uphold a great many additional restrictions on the right to bear arms.
It’s true that the Supreme Court has noted that the term “the people” also shows up in the First and Fourth Amendments, and that Heller noted that gun rights were in some ways similar to free-speech rights. (In fact, I authored a legal scholarly work, “Making Second Amendment Law with First Amendment Rules,” published by Nebraska Law Review, that explains the relationship between these two parts of the Constitution’s Bill of Rights.)
But as the Seventh Circuit admitted, other uses of “the people” in the Constitution—such as Article I, Section 2’s provision that members of Congress shall be elected every two years “by the People of the several States,” and the Seventeenth Amendment’s provision that senators will be elected in each state “by the People thereof”—clearly refer only to voting citizens, though even then the court tries to maintain some wiggle room by saying this is only “likely.”
Even cases where the Supreme Court has interpreted “the people” differently do not support the Seventh Circuit’s interpretation. For example, in U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez, the High Court held that “the people” in the Bill of Rights includes only noncitizens who have “developed a sufficient connection with this country to be considered part of [the national] community,” such as permanent legal residents. The Court specifically contrasted the foreigner in that case from illegal aliens, saying that legal residents such as Mr. Verdugo-Urquidez “were in the United States voluntarily and had accepted some societal obligations.”
This panel could have chosen between two meanings of “the people”: one referring only to American citizens, and the other also including some (but not all) noncitizens. It freely chose to reject the argument that the right to bear arms is a special right that the Constitution promises to citizens eligible to vote. And the court also invoked one of the two wrongheaded decisions at the heart of the birthright citizenship immigration debate—Plyler v. Doe—where liberal Justice William Brennan slipped into a footnote in a 5-4 decision a nonbinding comment that states have no rational basis for treating legal aliens differently from illegal aliens.
The Chicago-based appeals court concluded, “No language in the Amendment supports such a conclusion, nor, as we have said, does a broader consideration of the Bill of Rights.”
The court is wrong. The Declaration of Independence says that in order to be legitimate, government must be by the consent of the governed, and that when the people of a nation withdraw their consent, the people have the right to “alter or abolish” that government.
The Constitution designed America’s democratic republican form of government to incorporate these principles. Adult citizens of this country have a fundamental right to vote, and this is the means by which citizens express their consent to be governed by certain people for a certain time. Then during the next election, those citizens again have the right to use their vote to withdraw their consent, and to alter their current government by electing new people.
As discussed in my law review article, the Supreme Court in Heller found that the reason the Second Amendment was written into the Constitution’s Bill of Rights was so that the American people could throw off a tyrannical regime that took power against the vote of the people, and held onto that power through military might. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the Supreme Court that “fear that the federal government would disarm the people in order to impose rule through [the military] was pervasive,” and that armed citizens “are better able to resist tyranny.” The right to remove from power such a regime is a power that the Constitution reserves to the voting citizens of this country, not to foreigners, and especially not to foreigners who are not even in this country legally.
This does not mean that foreigners should not be able to own firearms, as I explain both in my Nebraska Law Review work and also in another academic publication, “Citizen Gun Rights.” The Second Amendment secures a right to self-defense, and foreigners in this country—especially permanent lawful residents—have the same human concerns regarding their personal safety and the security of their families, homes, and businesses that any other human being might have. This simply means that Congress and state legislatures can decide when and how a foreigner in this country can have firearms, instead of it being a constitutional guarantee to be decreed by the courts.
The Seventh Circuit’s decision is manifestly wrong for other reasons as well. For one, it casts doubt on the legality of the federal law that says a person must be an adult to purchase a firearm from a store. Political rights—such as the right to vote or the right to serve on a jury—only apply to adult citizens. But personal rights—such as First Amendment rights to free speech or Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable police searches—can also be claimed and exercised by children. A fourth-grade student has a First Amendment right to pray over her lunch at school or to tell her teacher that her favorite hero is Jesus, but only an insane person would suggest that fourth-grader has a constitutional right to buy a gun.
In conclusion, the Seventh Circuit’s decision is disturbing for two reasons. One, it diminishes the value of American citizenship and muddies the water in multiple areas of law and public policy by ignoring the vital distinction the Constitution makes between adult American citizens as opposed to foreigners (especially illegal aliens). And second, it degrades the Second Amendment into a right that can be regulated far more heavily—and thus carries much less force—than other fundamental rights.
The federal government cannot appeal this decision, because in the end it won its case by affirming the district court’s decision not to dismiss the case against Meza-Rodriguez. So unfortunately, unless this criminal asks the Supreme Court to review his case, this case will stay on the books for some time, working mischief to the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding American citizens.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/30/appeals-court-illegal-aliens-have-right-to-own-guns/
by Ken Klukowski30 Aug 2015Washington, D.C.11,076
Illegal aliens can now claim Second Amendment rights to own guns in violation of federal law, according to a federal appeals court that completely ignored the primary reason for the right to bear arms: to give Americans citizens the right to remove a tyrannical regime from power.
Mariano Meza-Rodriguez is an illegal alien from Mexico who was carrying ammunition for a .22-caliber firearm when he was arrested in 2013. He has been here since his parents brought him around age five. But federal law, found at 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5), makes it a crime for an illegal alien to have a gun. He was convicted, sentenced to time served, then deported to Mexico. He is appealing the federal district court’s decision not to dismiss his indictment that led to his conviction.The Second Amendment provides that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” In a seminal 2008 case, the Supreme Court held in District of Columbia v. Heller that the Second Amendment secures an individual right to keep and bear arms. On August 20, 2015, Chief Judge Diane Wood (a liberal appointee of Bill Clinton who was on Barack Obama’s short-list for the Supreme Court) wrote for a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit that the panel could “see no principled way to carve out the Second Amendment and say that [illegal aliens] are excluded” from exercising Second Amendment rights.
The court’s opinion admitted, “some of Heller’s language does link Second Amendment rights with the notions of ‘law-abiding citizens’ and ‘members of the political community.’” But then the court incorrectly claims that Heller also “supports the opposite result: that all people, including non-U.S. citizens, whether or not they are authorized to be in the country, enjoy at least some rights under the Second Amendment.” The Seventh Circuit noted that three other federal appeals courts have said that illegal aliens do not have Second Amendment rights, but concluded that those courts were wrong, creating what lawyers call a “circuit split” by holding that § 922(g)(5) is unconstitutional.
But the court went on to sustain the indictment that led to Meza-Rodriguez’s conviction, with an analysis that’s bad news for gun owners. Chief Judge Wood wrote that while illegal aliens are entitled to Second Amendment rights, gun restrictions such as this one should only be subject to what courts call “intermediate scrutiny,” under which the court can uphold this statute, but also uphold a great many additional restrictions on the right to bear arms.
It’s true that the Supreme Court has noted that the term “the people” also shows up in the First and Fourth Amendments, and that Heller noted that gun rights were in some ways similar to free-speech rights. (In fact, I authored a legal scholarly work, “Making Second Amendment Law with First Amendment Rules,” published by Nebraska Law Review, that explains the relationship between these two parts of the Constitution’s Bill of Rights.)
But as the Seventh Circuit admitted, other uses of “the people” in the Constitution—such as Article I, Section 2’s provision that members of Congress shall be elected every two years “by the People of the several States,” and the Seventeenth Amendment’s provision that senators will be elected in each state “by the People thereof”—clearly refer only to voting citizens, though even then the court tries to maintain some wiggle room by saying this is only “likely.”
Even cases where the Supreme Court has interpreted “the people” differently do not support the Seventh Circuit’s interpretation. For example, in U.S. v. Verdugo-Urquidez, the High Court held that “the people” in the Bill of Rights includes only noncitizens who have “developed a sufficient connection with this country to be considered part of [the national] community,” such as permanent legal residents. The Court specifically contrasted the foreigner in that case from illegal aliens, saying that legal residents such as Mr. Verdugo-Urquidez “were in the United States voluntarily and had accepted some societal obligations.”
This panel could have chosen between two meanings of “the people”: one referring only to American citizens, and the other also including some (but not all) noncitizens. It freely chose to reject the argument that the right to bear arms is a special right that the Constitution promises to citizens eligible to vote. And the court also invoked one of the two wrongheaded decisions at the heart of the birthright citizenship immigration debate—Plyler v. Doe—where liberal Justice William Brennan slipped into a footnote in a 5-4 decision a nonbinding comment that states have no rational basis for treating legal aliens differently from illegal aliens.
The Chicago-based appeals court concluded, “No language in the Amendment supports such a conclusion, nor, as we have said, does a broader consideration of the Bill of Rights.”
The court is wrong. The Declaration of Independence says that in order to be legitimate, government must be by the consent of the governed, and that when the people of a nation withdraw their consent, the people have the right to “alter or abolish” that government.
The Constitution designed America’s democratic republican form of government to incorporate these principles. Adult citizens of this country have a fundamental right to vote, and this is the means by which citizens express their consent to be governed by certain people for a certain time. Then during the next election, those citizens again have the right to use their vote to withdraw their consent, and to alter their current government by electing new people.
As discussed in my law review article, the Supreme Court in Heller found that the reason the Second Amendment was written into the Constitution’s Bill of Rights was so that the American people could throw off a tyrannical regime that took power against the vote of the people, and held onto that power through military might. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the Supreme Court that “fear that the federal government would disarm the people in order to impose rule through [the military] was pervasive,” and that armed citizens “are better able to resist tyranny.” The right to remove from power such a regime is a power that the Constitution reserves to the voting citizens of this country, not to foreigners, and especially not to foreigners who are not even in this country legally.
This does not mean that foreigners should not be able to own firearms, as I explain both in my Nebraska Law Review work and also in another academic publication, “Citizen Gun Rights.” The Second Amendment secures a right to self-defense, and foreigners in this country—especially permanent lawful residents—have the same human concerns regarding their personal safety and the security of their families, homes, and businesses that any other human being might have. This simply means that Congress and state legislatures can decide when and how a foreigner in this country can have firearms, instead of it being a constitutional guarantee to be decreed by the courts.
The Seventh Circuit’s decision is manifestly wrong for other reasons as well. For one, it casts doubt on the legality of the federal law that says a person must be an adult to purchase a firearm from a store. Political rights—such as the right to vote or the right to serve on a jury—only apply to adult citizens. But personal rights—such as First Amendment rights to free speech or Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable police searches—can also be claimed and exercised by children. A fourth-grade student has a First Amendment right to pray over her lunch at school or to tell her teacher that her favorite hero is Jesus, but only an insane person would suggest that fourth-grader has a constitutional right to buy a gun.
In conclusion, the Seventh Circuit’s decision is disturbing for two reasons. One, it diminishes the value of American citizenship and muddies the water in multiple areas of law and public policy by ignoring the vital distinction the Constitution makes between adult American citizens as opposed to foreigners (especially illegal aliens). And second, it degrades the Second Amendment into a right that can be regulated far more heavily—and thus carries much less force—than other fundamental rights.
The federal government cannot appeal this decision, because in the end it won its case by affirming the district court’s decision not to dismiss the case against Meza-Rodriguez. So unfortunately, unless this criminal asks the Supreme Court to review his case, this case will stay on the books for some time, working mischief to the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding American citizens.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/30/appeals-court-illegal-aliens-have-right-to-own-guns/
Yesterday at 10:04 am by Rocky
» Al-Alaq: The monetary situation in Iraq is excellent and our reserves support the stability of the e
Yesterday at 8:29 am by Rocky
» utube 11/23/24 MM&C Reporting-Expectations are High-IMF-Flexible Exchange Rate Regime-Pr
Yesterday at 6:33 am by Rocky
» utube 11/25/24 MM&C MM&C Iraq News-CBI Building Final Touches-Oil Exports-Development Road-Turkey-B
Yesterday at 6:33 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary movement to include the salary scale in the next session
Yesterday at 5:11 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary Finance Committee reveals the budget paragraphs included in the amendment
Yesterday at 5:10 am by Rocky
» Al-Maliki calls on the Bar Association to hold accountable members who violate professional conduct
Yesterday at 5:08 am by Rocky
» Politician: The security agreement with America has many aspects
Yesterday at 5:07 am by Rocky
» Kurdistan Planning: More than 6 million people live in the region, the oldest of them is 126 years o
Yesterday at 5:05 am by Rocky
» Al-Alaq: Arab consensus on the role of central bank programs in addressing challenges
Yesterday at 5:03 am by Rocky
» Economics saves from political drowning
Yesterday at 5:02 am by Rocky
» Agriculture calls for strict ban on import of "industrial fats" and warns of health risks
Yesterday at 5:01 am by Rocky
» Iraq is the fourth largest oil exporter to China
Yesterday at 5:00 am by Rocky
» Railways continue to maintain a number of its lines to ensure the smooth running of trains
Yesterday at 4:59 am by Rocky
» Parliament resumes its sessions tomorrow.. and these are the most important amendments in the budget
Yesterday at 4:58 am by Rocky
» Bitcoin Fails to Continue Rising as It Approaches $100,000
Yesterday at 4:57 am by Rocky
» Minister of Planning: There will be accurate figures for the population of each governorate
Yesterday at 4:56 am by Rocky
» Popular Mobilization Law is ready for voting
Yesterday at 4:54 am by Rocky
» Mechanisms for accepting people with disabilities into postgraduate studies
Yesterday at 4:52 am by Rocky
» Government coordination to create five thousand jobs
Yesterday at 4:51 am by Rocky
» Transport: Next month, a meeting with the international organization to resolve the European ban
Yesterday at 4:50 am by Rocky
» Census is a path to digital government
Yesterday at 4:49 am by Rocky
» Calls to facilitate loans and reduce interest rates for the private sector
Yesterday at 4:47 am by Rocky
» The launch of the third and final phase of the "population census"
Yesterday at 4:46 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani: We have accomplished a step that is the most prominent in the framework of planning, deve
Yesterday at 4:44 am by Rocky
» Justice discusses modern mechanisms to develop investment in real estate and minors’ money
Yesterday at 4:43 am by Rocky
» Dubai to host Arabplast exhibition next month
Yesterday at 4:41 am by Rocky
» Al-Tamimi: Integrity plays a major role in establishing the foundations of laws that will uphold jus
Yesterday at 4:39 am by Rocky
» Reaching the most important people involved in the "theft of the century" in Diyala
Yesterday at 4:38 am by Rocky
» Transportation: Completion of excavation works and connection of the immersed tunnel manufacturing b
Yesterday at 4:36 am by Rocky
» Between internal and regional challenges... Formation of the Kurdistan government on a "slow fire" a
Yesterday at 4:35 am by Rocky
» Kurdistan Region Presidency: We will issue a regional order to determine the first session of parlia
Yesterday at 4:34 am by Rocky
» The Minister of Foreign Affairs announces the convening of the Ambassadors Conference tomorrow, Mond
Yesterday at 4:33 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani: Iraq must always be at the forefront
Yesterday at 4:32 am by Rocky
» Al-Mashhadani: We support the Foreign Ministry in confronting any external interference that affects
Yesterday at 4:31 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani chairs meeting with Oliver Wyman delegation
Yesterday at 4:29 am by Rocky
» Half a million beggars in Iraq.. 90% of them receive welfare salaries
Yesterday at 4:27 am by Rocky
» Sudanese announces preliminary results of the general population and housing census in detail
Yesterday at 4:26 am by Rocky
» The centenary of the Iraqi Ministry of Foreign Affairs.. A journey of challenges and achievements
Yesterday at 4:25 am by Rocky
» Prime Minister's Advisor Announces Assignment of Two International Companies to Study Iraqi Banking
Yesterday at 4:23 am by Rocky
» Agriculture: Integrated Support Project Provides 1,333 Job Opportunities
Yesterday at 4:22 am by Rocky
» The Media and Education Commission discuss introducing advanced curricula related to artificial inte
Yesterday at 4:20 am by Rocky
» Al-Mashhadani’s First Test: Discussing Israeli Threats and Avoiding Controversial Laws
Yesterday at 4:20 am by Rocky
» By name.. A parliamentary bloc reveals that five ministers will be questioned at the end of the legi
Yesterday at 4:19 am by Rocky
» The financial budget is subject to political and economic amendments in the next parliamentary sessi
Yesterday at 4:18 am by Rocky
» Will the government's efforts succeed in ending the electricity crisis in Iraq?
Yesterday at 4:17 am by Rocky
» Baghdad Airport Customs Increased to 400% After Implementing Automation
Yesterday at 4:16 am by Rocky
» EU: Integrated Support Project in Iraq Creates Jobs in Agriculture and Youth
Yesterday at 4:15 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani attends the centenary ceremony of the establishment of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Yesterday at 4:13 am by Rocky
» Al-Mashhadani: We seek to keep foreign policy away from alignments that harm Iraq’s unity and sovere
Yesterday at 4:12 am by Rocky
» The Iraqi government is working to develop a competitive banking system and support the private sect
Yesterday at 4:10 am by Rocky
» Al-Alaq: Arab consensus on the role of central bank programs in addressing challenges
Yesterday at 4:09 am by Rocky
» Regional markets rise in first session of the week
Yesterday at 4:08 am by Rocky
» Kurdistan Region Presidency: We will issue an order to set the first session of the regional parliam
Yesterday at 4:06 am by Rocky
» Political differences hinder oil and gas law legislation
Yesterday at 4:05 am by Rocky
» Government coordination to create new job grades for graduates
Yesterday at 4:04 am by Rocky
» The financial budget is subject to amendments in the next parliamentary session
Yesterday at 4:03 am by Rocky
» Alsumaria Newsletter: Iraq reaches the final stages of the census and Parliament resumes its session
Yesterday at 4:01 am by Rocky
» After the elites and workers... Iranian factories "migrate" to Iraq
Yesterday at 3:58 am by Rocky
» Beggars in Iraq "refuse" welfare salaries.. Their profits are 10 times the salary!
Yesterday at 3:57 am by Rocky
» Amending the Election Law... A Means to Restore the Dilapidated Legitimacy
Yesterday at 3:56 am by Rocky
» Prime Minister announces population census results, Iraq reaches 45 million mark
Yesterday at 3:54 am by Rocky
» Find out the dollar exchange rates in the Iraqi markets
Yesterday at 3:53 am by Rocky
» Kurdistan Interior Ministry: General amnesty does not include those accused of killing women
Yesterday at 3:52 am by Rocky
» utube 11/21/24 MM&C MM&C News Reporting-Global Trade-Best Route in World-Purchase Power-Justice-Cen
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 6:58 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani discusses with the Secretary-General of the Digital Cooperation Organization enhancing dig
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 6:56 am by Rocky
» President of the Republic: Partnership with the United States is essential to achieve regional stabi
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 6:54 am by Rocky
» Mazhar Saleh reveals details of the 2023 budget and the 2024 budget horizon
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 5:18 am by Rocky
» Absent control and rising corruption.. Sudan faces a harsh political winter
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 5:16 am by Rocky
» A representative shows the laws prepared for voting during the upcoming sessions.
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 5:14 am by Rocky
» Corrupt people in it.. Independent MP criticizes the performance of Al-Sudani's government
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 5:13 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary Oil Committee reveals government move to end electricity crisis
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 5:11 am by Rocky
» The Administrative Court postpones consideration of the lawsuit on the legitimacy of the Kirkuk gove
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 5:10 am by Rocky
» MP: The ministerial reshuffle depends on consensus within the state administration
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 5:09 am by Rocky
» Politicians put question marks on Al-Sudani: corruption, espionage and serving foreign interests
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 5:08 am by Rocky
» The International Union of Arab Bankers honors the Chairman of the Private Banks Association: A prom
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 5:03 am by Rocky
» Industry: Contracts to supply state ministries with food products
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 5:02 am by Rocky
» After Shell Withdrawal, American Company Heads to Implement Al-Nibras Project in Iraq
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 5:01 am by Rocky
» Revealing the fate of the Chinese deal in Iraq.. It was disrupted by this party
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 5:00 am by Rocky
» The Central Bank of Iraq 77 years of challenges and reforms
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:57 am by Rocky
» "Unprecedented numbers"... American "CNN" talks about tourism in Iraq
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:56 am by Rocky
» After implementing automation, Baghdad Airport Customs jumps 400 percent
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:55 am by Rocky
» Iraq participates in sustainable development activities
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:53 am by Rocky
» Al-Sudani opens 790 model schools
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:52 am by Rocky
» Parliamentary Culture: The Right to Information Law will satisfy all parties
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:51 am by Rocky
» Al-Mashhadani to {Sabah}: Tomorrow we will discuss the Zionist threats
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:50 am by Rocky
» Industry to {Sabah}: Contracts to supply state ministries with food products
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:49 am by Rocky
» Trade cooperation between Najaf and Isfahan
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:48 am by Rocky
» {New building} and {electronic systems} to develop forensic medicine
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:47 am by Rocky
» A specialized center for monitoring the environmental situation in the capital
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:46 am by Rocky
» International and parliamentary praise for the success of the "population census" process
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:45 am by Rocky
» The European Union organizes a workshop in Basra on central administration and the wealth distributi
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:42 am by Rocky
» The Media Authority and the Ministry of Education discuss the importance of enhancing and introducin
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:41 am by Rocky
» Iraq's oil exports to America rose last week
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:40 am by Rocky
» Electricity announces loss of 5,500 megawatts due to complete halt of Iranian gas supplies
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:39 am by Rocky
» Tomorrow.. The Arab League is looking to unify its position against Israeli intentions to strike Ira
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:37 am by Rocky
» The Central Bank moves its secret vaults to its new building.. Clarification of the truth of the cla
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:35 am by Rocky
» Network reveals the fate of the Chinese deal.. It was disrupted by "Iraqi officials"
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:34 am by Rocky
» From the White House to the "Leaders of Iraq"... A Message Regarding the Targeting of Baghdad
Sun 24 Nov 2024, 4:33 am by Rocky