Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Foreign Policy: US withdrawal Iraq has returned to zero

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 280814
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Foreign Policy: US withdrawal Iraq has returned to zero Empty Foreign Policy: US withdrawal Iraq has returned to zero

    Post by Rocky Sun 16 Oct 2016, 2:51 am

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    Foreign Policy: US withdrawal Iraq has returned to zero


     translation term 

    It seems that Iraq today is lost, and cast theblame on the Republicans to lose it to President Barack Obama "because Hillary Clinton failed to negotiate the forces that would have allowed for some US combat troops to stay in Iraq and protect the gains made by American soldiers in 2009 , a convention." For their part , say supporters of Obama that the Iraqis are wasted Iraq, led by former Prime Minister Nuri al - Maliki, who did not look further than sectarian identity, and this provoked Sunnis who fought al - Qaida alongside US forces. 
    Most of the blame must fall on al - Maliki and Bashar al - Assad Syria, which is on peaceful protests against his rule into civil war helped to the prosperity and growing Daesh group. 
    if George W. Bush was waging his war on Iraq have been able to exploit the vacuum Daesh there. 
    but Obama bears some of the blame for failing to take advantage of those gains. In 2008 , when Obama was a presidential candidate, Afghanistan was the most important war while Iraq is draining the blood ofAmericans and their money. 
    When Obama visited Iraq in July of that year told the commander , Gen. David Petraeus said the United States to speed up the withdrawal of its troops from Iraq because Afghanistan "are the central front in thewar on terror , "then responded Petraeus said Iraq is a central front. At the time Obama was reflecting theopinion of the American people , who have tired of the war in Iraq - because they are as people see - it was adisastrous mistake. Suppose that Obama convinced the opinion of Petraeus Was that would be a big difference? The 
    Iraqis have refused to ensure that the prosecution of US troops in Iraqi courts and that the US administration was forced to withdraw all its forces. However, al - Maliki has agreed to mutual understanding on executive agreement , but the Obama administration has insisted that al - Maliki Asthsal approval of the parliament, which al - Maliki said he would not be able Asthsalha. And decided the Obama administration not to take risks because they were not believed it needed to keep troops in Iraq. 
    Timely topped matter of priorities in the summer of 2011, Obama was ready - due to face budgetary pressures - to keep the 3,500 fighters, while the Defense Ministry asked for 16 thousand fighters. It can be said that even with such a large number, the United States were not able to crush al - Qaida; 's campaign -Maliki for the persecution of Sunni tribes and their political leaders have caused increasing numbers ofextremists. 
    One thing the United States learned in Iraq and Afghanistan is that the army can win the battles, but he can not solve the problems of a political nature. Here , too , the Obama administration committed serious errors in its judgment. He said al - Maliki bad motives, did not generate a holistic democratic rule, but was born and competing forms of ethnic nationalism. Maliki was the wrong man for Iraq and the United States alike, say critics of the administration was on the US officials to remove him from power after losing the 2010 elections to the Iraqi List. 
    Obama has allowed Iraq to stumble alone while taking up the war in Afghanistan. He says Ryan Crocker, theUS ambassador to Iraq in 2007- 2009 , "while helping the US presence to prevent Iraqi factions from tearing each other, the withdrawal of forces , Iraq has returned to zero." 
     Obama was believed that the Iraqis would not fend for themselves , as long as the United States exist to mediate their differences. In fact, it sent 4,500 fighters currently in Iraq is a clear evidence of wrong belief. 
    Obama has convinced himself that things will go just fine on its own and that the US presence will increase the bad things, but in the fact that the absence of the United States was worse than its existence.
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Thu 14 Nov 2024, 10:50 pm