ruled the Federal Supreme Court , Tuesday, that the use of the right to legal defense does not ensure that exceeded the limits , and prejudice to the rights of others, received a lawsuit to appeal against the constitutionality of Article 226 of the Penal Code No. 111 of 1969. 

The official spokesman of the court Illes Acommok in A statement received by Alsumaria News, a copy, that "the plaintiff, and by his agent in the lawsuit, had pleaded in a criminal case as a lawyer for the accused before the Central Criminal Court , in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (IV) of Article (19) of the Constitution, which guaranteed the right of defense in this the field".

Al-Samok added that "the Central Criminal Court has filed a criminal action against the plaintiff because it attacked the Commission during the hearing in the words of insulting the Commission, and took the criminal proceedings against him and was referred to the competent court to be tried in accordance with Article 226 of the Penal Code." 

He pointed out that "the plaintiff filed his case before the Federal Supreme Court objected to the unconstitutionality of this article because it began in the era of dictatorship, was based in his appeal to the provisions of Article (19 / IV) of the Constitution. 

"The Federal Supreme Court found that article 19 (IV) of the Constitution guaranteed the right of defense at all stages of the investigation and trial, but did not guarantee that the limits of this right were exceeded. When the owner of the rights over others. "

He added that "the Federal Supreme Court found that the legislation of Article (226) of the Penal Code, regardless of the time of its legislation does not violate the provisions of the Constitution, and accordingly the court decided to respond to the plaintiff's claim not to rely on the Constitution.