Legal expert: the impossibility of transforming the system of government in Iraq to the presidential

[ltr]Legal expert: the impossibility of transforming the system of government in Iraq to the presidential[/ltr]

 Since 01.25.2017 at 09:50 (Baghdad time)
[ltr][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/ltr]
[ltr]BAGHDAD - balances News[/ltr]
[ltr]Description legal expert Tareq Harb, on Wednesday, a move to adopt a presidential rather than parliamentary system of government in Iraq as the "impossibility."[/ltr]
[ltr]A statement by the war received / balances News / copy of it, he was "one of the political blocs announced their desire to adopt a presidential system as a system of governance and this statement entails converting the system of government from parliamentary system currently located to the presidential system so that the head of state is to be the first power and the consequent great adjustment and many the provisions of the Constitution as it must modify several articles of the Constitution. "[/ltr]
[ltr]He added that "it is not difficult, but it could be up to the impossibility of amending the constitution in the current circumstances, at least the provisions of the Constitution must be amended begins with the first article that the parliamentary system adopted a system of government and replace it with a presidential system."[/ltr]
[ltr]He pointed out a war to "the necessity to amend Article (60) on the draft laws, which must be submitted by the President of the Republic only to Parliament and reduce the powers of Parliament under Article (61) and depositing some of these powers to the President, as the role of parliament oversight over the executive authority and leave the election of the President of the Republic to people and not to the parliament and give the President of the Republic ratify some treaties, conventions and approve the appointment of some of the staff from the owners of special grades and make the authority to exempt the President is two-thirds of the members of parliament with the approval and make a withdrawal of confidence and dismissal of the Prime Minister and the Minister of the validity of the president, rather than parliament and give it the power to declare war and emergency. " .[/ltr]
[ltr]He pointed out a war to "amend Article (62) by making the numbers of the general budget of the validity of the president as long as he was the only party that holds the referral of the draft laws to the parliament and the abolition of the Council of Ministers the power and the amendment of Article (64) so ​​that the president may dissolve parliament without the need for approval of the Prime Minister and the modification of the provisions numerous constitutional own executive power contained in the material (66) to (86) of the constitution so that the president authority are predominant and the university each incoming authorities in these materials and modifying the validity of the prime minister and the cabinet so that the President of the Republic have the upper hand holder and modify the powers of the President upwards and grant the president the authority of the nomination of the members of the Federal Supreme Court. "[/ltr]
[ltr]He continued, "There are many constitutional articles to be adjusted as well as the need to be modified hundreds of legislation that should give the president the powers without the other as long as the presidential system of government, not parliament, and there are two in the world in their first presidential system of absolute presidential system as planned, the US president as There are no post of prime minister and the minister is the secretary to the president so he called the secretary of the word in English and not a minister. "[/ltr]
[ltr]He noted legal expert that "what is observed that the amendment to the constitution is very complex and difficult, and it can be almost impossible, at least in the current situation, whether the amendment in accordance with Article 142 or Article 126 of the Constitution as our Constitution is one of the constitutions rigid requirement of many approvals for modification evidence that the Constitution has decided to make an adjustment in the first four months of 2006 and went on this date ten years without making the amendment because it must be approved by the parliamentary committee and the House of Representatives and the people, regions and non-veto of three provinces so that if parliament passed and the people on the amendment, the three provinces have veto amendments so it's not all what one hopes not realize all his party bestowed. "[/ltr]

[ltr]The coalition of state law, called yesterday to adopt a presidential system rather than in the [/ltr]
[ltr]parliamentary governance.[/ltr]

[ltr][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.][/ltr]