Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Iraq Dinar/News is a popular topic among many topics this board offers. You must log in to see and participate in our Dinar sections.

Hello friends -

Have you wanted to grow your nest egg faster to fulfill your family's dreams? Maybe you own an IRA, a 401K, maybe even a few stocks and mutual funds. Or maybe you're just starting...

Take a few moments to explore a simple program which can accelerate and even turbocharge your wealth growth to reach your dreams!


I can be reached by phone or text 7am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2017

Pittsburgh Penguins


Posts : 10671
Thanked : 1380
Join date : 2013-02-20

Pittsburgh Penguins

Post by jedi17 on Fri Aug 11, 2017 9:20 pm

Learning from zone entries
August 11, 2017, 1:01 PM ET [22 Comments]
Ryan Wilson
Pittsburgh Penguins Blogger • RSS • Archive • CONTACT
It's no secret that I very much enjoy the micro-stat data that is being manually tracked by folks like Corey Sznajder and Ryan Stimson. The findings from the tracking are doing a nice job of combining the eye test with data analysis. We know that passing is important and creates offense. What we didn't have was a searchable database to reference players at any time on the internet. We have an ever growing sample of that now.

By taking this information we can then try to use it to formulate game plans and how hockey team's should go on the attack. What works best? What isn't getting results? The best kind of analysis is going to use data as a starting point to find patterns and then video analysis to find out why the numbers are the way they are.

Today I saw a few tweets from Adam Stringham of Japers Rink Radio that were of interest to me. He used Corey Sznajder's tracking data to show how many seconds after a zone entry yields the biggest offensive production.

So four seconds after a zone entry yields the most offense, but why?

My running hypothesis isn't complicated. When you enter the zone with speed on the rush under control you have enough time to drive the strong side defender back and open up things like a drop pass. After the drop pass there's just enough time to either slide it over again or rip a shot from the slot. I would wager most successful fast break rushes that involve passing fit the four second time frame.

Here are a few good examples of what a four second zone entry which leads to a goal looks like



An oldie but goodie


Yes that is Ryan Whitney out there just to date the clip.

It's pretty obvious with these example why the four second entry leads the pack. Just look at the lead up to the play. The Penguins own the neutral zone with the puck and get clean entries. The speed and control opens up the ice surface for the other Pittsburgh attackers and players like Evgeni Malkin will make the most of that time and space.

It's no surprise that shot attempts off the rush and goals are correlated. Four seconds is optimal for both

Four seconds also leads the way in the amount of goals that are scored on the first shot attempt

Six seconds leads the way with goals that are scored with a second shot attempt. These are very likely your rebound goals off of a controlled entry.

It's great when we can marry data with visual evidence. This is practical and can help shape and mold tactics in order to recreate the situations that have the most optimal results. Sure, it takes talent to make the plays that the players above did in the offensive zone, but how they earned that time and space the precipitated it is just as important and deserves the focus.

As our databases grow with information we will continue to gain confidence in what works in hockey and why.

Thanks for reading!

    Current date/time is Fri Jul 20, 2018 6:10 am