Specialists: the judiciary obeys the laws of Bremer and there are three important legislation needs

Specialists: the judiciary obeys the laws of Bremer and there are three important legislation needs to be adjusted is still 

 




13.11.2013 | (Voice of Iraq)

 

 
 
Long-Presse / Baghdad confirmed Accountants, said on Wednesday that the judiciary is still obeys the laws of CPA developed by Bremer, as called for drafting a "real" to the laws of judicial because they are in direct contact Iraqi situation, which is exposed to "shocks different," emphasized that the law the Supreme Judicial Council No legislation in the House of Representatives so far, while for drew to the need to amend the "three important laws." said Director of Legal Studies at the House of Wisdom Hanan al-Qaisi in an interview (to the extent Press) on the sidelines of a seminar نضمها Judicial Institute on Wednesday in the Institute building to shed light on the most important laws broken, "The Law of the Supreme Judicial Council so far between attraction and a tender has not been enacted in the House of Representatives and there are laws that are very important are still working out since the last century into law of the judiciary and the law of judicial organization and the law of the Federal Court and need to be adjustments." She Qaisi that "the general situation in Iraq requires that there be drafting real laws of jurisdictions and laws of judicial institutions being in contact directly the Iraqi situation, which is exposed from time to time to concussions differently." For his part, Director General of the Judicial Institute of Caesar Yahya in an interview (long-Presse) The Judicial Institute continues to place all the foundations on which possible that the development of judicial work in Iraq through the adoption of research and proposals for legal and judges, "noting that" a seminar today focused on a lot of things, especially the nature of the work of judicial institutions and how to exploit the research presented at the symposium including with regard to the extent of independence the judiciary, including those related with evidence of proof adopted by the judicial authority. " In turn, the head of the Middle East Center for Studies and Legal Development denominator bonded in an interview (long-Presse), said that "there are laws concerning the judiciary and remains disabled and delayed the House of Representatives a lot in approval while still building authority Iraq's judiciary depends on the orders of the CPA and the House of Representatives demands at the age of these laws as soon as possible. " said slave that "there is confusion between the articles of the Constitution and the laws in force before the Constitution and there is a problem especially things CPA and must unite Group legislations judiciary in a single law serves the judicial process in the whole of Iraq. " was deputies belonging to the political blocs large, on July 12, 2013, to highlight the differences on the Law of the Federal Court confined to old members and how their choice and replace them as well as a number of Muslim Jurists in which the nature of their role, while felt that those differences "is not substantial "and could be dealt with a proposal that the selection of members by a committee of the judiciary and the presidency and parliament. Prior to the decision of the parliament, Mohammed al-Khalidi, that was announced in (the third of July, 2013), by agreement of the Presidency of the Parliament with the heads of parliamentary blocs, to pass laws contentious basket one in Parliament, pointing out that the most prominent of these laws that Court's Federal Supreme Court, and the prohibition of the Baath Party and the law of parties, "but he declined it, denying the existence of such an agreement. rejected the Iraqi List, in (the sixth of July, 2013), a draft pass laws basket one , accused the state law to disrupt a legal Federal Court and the parties, seeking to force the other blocks to pass laws "is not in their interest." It is noteworthy that the Iraqi parliament to vote on the draft law of the Federal Supreme Court more than once because of political differences to its terms, most recently in (VIII July 2013), but the differences on it obstructed passed forcing the Council to postpone the vote until a final agreement on the draft law. accuses some political blocs, the views of many international, and a number of civil society organizations working in Iraq, the Iraqi judiciary siding with the government in its decisions and cites several incidents issued by the Federal Court and other courts Iraqi decisions, "poured in the interest of the government," such as the decision of the largest bloc, refused to distribute cash to the citizens of the share of oil and other issues, as well as other charges with the government, "the weapon of judicial" against opponents by accusing them of "terrorism" in the context of "Tsagathm politically."


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]