Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Tehran is "satisfied" and Washington is "satisfied": what if the factions carried out an attack "not

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 281112
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Tehran is "satisfied" and Washington is "satisfied": what if the factions carried out an attack "not Empty Tehran is "satisfied" and Washington is "satisfied": what if the factions carried out an attack "not

    Post by Rocky Fri 10 Jan 2020, 10:47 am

    [url=https://ultrairaq.ultrasawt.com/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%B4%D8%AF %d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b4%d8%b9%d8%a8%d9%8a.png?itok=QSjP1p5R][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/url]
    Tehran is "satisfied" and Washington is "satisfied": what if the factions carried out an attack "not agreed upon"?
    January 09, 2020



    The factions in Iraq say that the engineer’s revenge came after the Iranian operation on Ein Al-Assad (Facebook)

    Ultra Iraq - Editorial Team
    The apparent indications in the Iranian position and the recent speech of the US President, Donald Trump, indicate that Tehran will suffice with the last strike of two American bases in Iraq, as an outlet for its threats to "retaliate" by Qasim Soleimani, which raises a question from observers and followers about Iran's position on any attacks that it may carry out. Loyalist factions "against American forces in Iraq, and whether Washington will deal with them as Iranian or" Iraqi insurgent attacks.
    share
    The missile attack targeting the al-Assad base is the first that Iran has carried out from within its territory and has explicitly embraced it.

    The [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] that targeted two American bases in [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] Erbil on the night of January 8, was the first carried out by Iran from inside its territory and was explicitly adopted, which came in response to the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] of the Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani in an American raid near Baghdad airport.
    Also read:  [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    The American side, after the attack occurred, was satisfied with sending reassurances about the status of its soldiers, and no angry calls and statements were made for this response, especially as it indicated its "prior knowledge" of the attack before it occurred, which was followed by [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] spoke of an agreement between the Iranian and American sides to implement " The formal attack "in order to dismiss threats by Tehran to avenge the killing of Soleimani, especially after the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] by the Iraqi Prime Minister, Adel Abdul-Mahdi, that the Iranian side informed him of the bombing before it occurred.
    In a speech he gave, commenting on the developments of the confrontation with Iran, US President Donald Trump said, "It seems that Tehran has retreated." Limited in the rules I target. "
    While Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei commented on the attack, which [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] "slap", revealing the desire to remove the American forces from the region, while his statement was free of any promise or escalation, indicating the presence of strikes and other future attacks.
    Iraqi attack in isolation from Iran
    With these indications and assertions that Iran intends to carry out other attacks and reach a "parity stage" between Iran and America, especially with the absence of the American escalation after the recent attack, observers wonder how to deal with any new attacks carried out by pro-Iranian factions in Iraq, and whether Iran You will disavow it.
    Meanwhile, the leader of the League of the Righteous League, Qais Khazali, considered that "the first Iranian response to the assassination of Soleimani took place, now at the time of the Iraqi response to the assassination of the engineer."
    share
    Hamza Mustafa for "Ultra Iraq": The factions response to the engineer’s death will definitely happen and it will not be the size of the Iranian attack and will not cause losses among the American forces.

    For its part, the Al-Nujaba movement thanked Iran for the attack it carried out against the American forces, according to its spokesperson Nasr Al-Shammari, who said in a statement that "Iraq Ultra" received a copy of it, "We warn the American soldiers. Also, with Iraqi hands, until the last soldier is evicted from you. " 
    Also read:  [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    The Secretary General of the Brigades of the Martyrs Brigade, Abu Alaa Al-Al-Wala'i, vowed, through a tweet followed by "Ultra Iraq," to remove the American forces from Iraq with "the highest level of humiliation and humiliation". 
    The nature of the response is conditional
    In the context, political analyst Hamza Mustafa stressed that "the Iraqi response to the killing of the engineer will inevitably fall and is separate from the Iranian response to the killing of Soleimani," suggesting that "it will not be the size of the Iranian attack and will not lead to losses among the American forces."
    Mustafa considered during an interview with "Ultra Iraq", that "inevitably if this attack occurred, the United States will not accuse Iran of being behind it this time, but rather will be the first responsible for the Iraqi factions," noting that "the United States dealing with the attack will be conditioned by losses in the ranks American forces or not. "
    He pointed out that "if there are no American losses after the upcoming attack, Washington will deal with the matter as it did the Iranian response, and if there are losses, the United States will respond with a harsh response to the factions, independently of Iran."


    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Fri 22 Nov 2024, 6:11 pm