Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    The Federal Court resolves the appeal of the federal and regional governments to the budget law

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 280438
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    The Federal Court resolves the appeal of the federal and regional governments to the budget law Empty The Federal Court resolves the appeal of the federal and regional governments to the budget law

    Post by Rocky Mon Aug 07, 2023 7:47 am

    The Federal Court resolves the appeal of the federal and regional governments to the budget law

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]



    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


    Economy News - Baghdad
    The Federal Supreme Court (the highest judicial authority in Iraq) announced, on Monday, the resolution of the Kurdistan Regional Government's appeal to the budget law.
    A statement to inform the Federal Supreme Court, which was received by "Al-Iqtisad News", stated, "The court considered this day the case No. (168 / Federal / 2023) filed before it by the plaintiff (President of the Kurdistan Regional Government / in addition to his job) against the defendant (Speaker of Parliament / in addition to (13) for the year 2023 ((the federal general budget of the Republic of Iraq for the fiscal years (2023, 2024, 2025))”.
    The statement added, "The Supreme Court issued its final and binding decision for all authorities, which includes the ruling on the unconstitutionality of the phrase (and with the approval of the Federal Prime Minister) contained in Article (11/First) and the phrase (and in the event that it is not possible to dissolve the House of Representatives to take the necessary decision) contained in Article (13/ VII) of the law.
    The court decided to dismiss the case regarding the challenge to the constitutionality of articles (2/first/5/b), (11/second), (12/second/a, b, c, d, e) and (13/eighth/b) of the law.
    The Federal Supreme Court also announced the resolution of the federal government's appeal to the budget law.
    And its media stated in another separate statement, that the Federal Supreme Court considered this day the case No. (153 / federal / 2023) filed before it by the plaintiff (Prime Minister / in addition to his job) against the defendant (Speaker of Parliament / in addition to his job) regarding the appeal against articles From Law No. (13) of 2023 ((The Federal General Budget of the Republic of Iraq for the fiscal years (2023, 2024, 2025))
    And it issued its final and binding decision for all authorities, which includes the ruling on the unconstitutionality of the phrase (exclusively) contained in Article (2 / first / 8 / c / 6), and the phrase (at his request) contained in the last part of Article (16 / second), and Article (20 / Sixth), Article (28 / Fourth / A), Article (57 / First / C), Article (70 / Second), and Article (72) of Law No. (13) for the year 2023 ((The Federal General Budget of the Republic of Iraq for the fiscal years (2023, 2024, 2025)).
    The decision also included a judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s case regarding the challenge to the constitutionality of Articles (28 / fourth / b), (62 / fourth), (63 / third), (65 / second), (71) and (75) of the above law.


    Views 15
    Added 08/07/2023 - 1:55 PM
    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Thu Nov 07, 2024 9:37 am