Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Parliament accuses the judiciary of violating the constitution by some paragraphs of judicial oversi

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 281203
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Parliament accuses the judiciary of violating the constitution by some paragraphs of judicial oversi Empty Parliament accuses the judiciary of violating the constitution by some paragraphs of judicial oversi

    Post by Rocky Thu 28 Jul 2016, 5:33 am

    [size=30]Parliament accuses the judiciary of violating the constitution by some paragraphs of judicial oversight body of legislation[/size]
    28/07/2016 12:04 | Number of Views: 154
    font size: [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    Direction Press / Baghdad
    Crossed the judiciary Federal deeply disturbed about some paragraphs of Judicial Oversight Authority Act, and while confirming that allow one of them to a member of the House of Representatives to refer the judge to investigate, and found that a clear violation of the principle of separation of powers contained in the Constitution.
    The spokesman for the judiciary Judge Abdul Sattar Bayraktar said in a statement "the trend Press" obtained a copy of it, that "judicial oversight body voter law by the House of Representatives involves paragraphs constitute a flagrant violation of the constitution and the nature of judicial work."
    He said, "The law granted to a member of the House of Representatives the right to refer the judge to investigate," pointing out that "this house is clear interference in the work of the judiciary."
    He said the official spokesman for the judiciary that "the text of the Constitution on the Chief judicial oversight body to a vote in the House of Representatives, and although it is an exception from the original, the new law expanded this exception and enjoined Vice-Chairman of the body as well," noting that "the law authorized the judicial supervisor, a judge of the class II, supervision and inspection of the members of the Federal Cassation they are also judges of the special class. "
    Bayraktar said that "the supervisor needs to service may exceed twenty years to become a member of this court and therefore does not have the experience and qualifications of judges in order to be granted the power to supervise them."
    For his part, member of the Supreme Judicial Council, and the President of the resumption of the Rusafa Court, Judge Jassem Mohammed Aboud that "the law Syotr estimated negative impact on the work of the courts," stressing that "beatings and clear to the Constitution, which singled out special materials to organize the work of the judiciary, which is otherwise as provided for in Article 47, the separation of powers. "
    Turn magistrate money laundering and economic crime Iyad Muhsin ligature said that "what is stated in Article 3 / Seventh-in-law and granted to a member of the House of Representatives to investigate the assignment of the judge is a clear violation of the principle of judicial independence enshrined in the Constitution."
    Ligature and explained that "the law directly affects the principle of separation of powers, which is the pillar of the democratic system," adding that "the current text of the most dangerous provisions legislated by the House of Representatives; because it significantly undermines the independence of judges and the courts."
     
    The House of Representatives voted in its meeting on the 13 of July of this draft Judiciary Oversight Commission and submitted by the Legal Committee " in view of the changes taking place in the period following the issuance of supervising the Judicial Law No. 124 of 1979 and to keep abreast of changes and compatibility with the new legislation and to ensure good performance in the judiciary , the components of thelaw Federal. " the sa

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Sun 24 Nov 2024, 8:11 am