The Guardian" indicate five huge knowledge about the details of the report is "Chilcot" over the Ira

[ltr]The Guardian" indicate five huge knowledge about the details of the report is "Chilcot" over the Iraq war[/ltr]

 Since 07.27.2016 at 09:38 (Baghdad time)
[ltr][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][/ltr]
[ltr]Baghdad balances News[/ltr]
[ltr]The Guardian published a story of Louise Kjetil titled "Five things to know my mother perhaps Chilcot report."[/ltr]
[ltr]Kjetil says that as soon as the Chilcot Inquiry report, which is long overdue for several years the newspapers and the media focused on the attacks against the former Prime Minister Tony Blair and his government and what they had done to shorten the irregularities and errors.[/ltr]
[ltr]Kjetil adds that the report, which included more than 2.6 million words highlighted several other things including 5 huge details.[/ltr]
[ltr]The first point is that Iraq were not more countries worrying about the possession of weapons of mass destruction.[/ltr]
[ltr]Kjetil confirms that William Ehrman, director of international cooperation at the Foreign Office told the Chilcot Inquiry that between 2000 and 2002 was the nuclear programs of Libya, Iran and North Korea is the biggest in the world and the interests of Britain danger and so far more than the risk of Iraq.[/ltr]
[ltr]The second point to which it refers Kjetil is that Britain was going to go to war in Iraq, regardless of the losses as the report pointed out that the first estimate of the costs of the war on Britain ended one month of actual participation in military operations before further confirmed that the then Prime Minister Tony Blair and all the officials in his government did not care to receive these estimates, which cost the country 9 billion and 240 million pounds.[/ltr]
[ltr]The third point is that the number of deaths and injuries of civilians is not registered as Blair wants to reduce the number of casualties reported as much as possible to gain public sympathy with the war, so the British government has made no effort to record the numbers of Iraqi civilian casualties.[/ltr]
[ltr]The fourth point is that Britain was known before the withdrawal that the Iraqi forces would be unable to maintain security. The report revealed that the training standards adopted by the British government to the Iraqi forces, which have been facilitated to accelerate the withdrawal from there.[/ltr]
[ltr]The fifth and final point highlighted by Kjetil is to discuss the findings of the report is important and is required where accomplished more than 7 years took and cost more than 10 million pounds and singled out one of the most important events in modern British history so demanding to discuss the results and draw lessons from it in the House of Alamom.anthy 29 / A 43[/ltr]




[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]