Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    Godfathers "general amnesty" face overturn the law, acceptance closing the loopholes

    Rocky
    Rocky
    Rocky
    Admin Assist
    Admin Assist


    Posts : 281112
    Join date : 2012-12-21
    • Post n°1

    Godfathers "general amnesty" face overturn the law, acceptance closing the loopholes Empty Godfathers "general amnesty" face overturn the law, acceptance closing the loopholes

    Post by Rocky Tue 20 Sep 2016, 3:22 am

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
    Godfathers "general amnesty" face overturn the law, acceptance closing the loopholes


     Baghdad / Wael blessing 

    It threatens the amendment of the amnesty law, which was adopted by the Prime Minister, to blow up the "deal" policy had coincided with the withdrawal of confidence from former Defense Minister Khaled al - Obeidi arrangements. 
    "Bargain" that led to the adoption of the law "amnesty" despite widespread criticism, also came after Shiite agreement - Sunni to pass a law "banning the Baath", in return for agreeing to the adoption of "accountability and justice" which is still in the drawers of the parliament until the moment. 


    in the meantime, the legal committee of parliamentary confirms that the government amendments "will not affect" on the application of the law, stressing the lack of the possibility of "re "freed, according to theprocedures for amnesty, to prison again. 
    but the parliamentary opposition limbs, in what is known Front reform, likely to accept the pro blocs amnesty government amendments, fearing directed the prime minister to challenge this time the overall law , rather than a change in some of its clauses. 
    He criticized Prime the government amnesty law, after days of approval, and described the parliament additions to its terms as "criminal." 
    it is imperative that Abadi either challenge the law in court for violating the provisions of the Constitution, or tosubmit a draft bill to amend paragraphs dilemma. If Abadi chose the second way, it will face the Parliament, which will consider the amendment as a new draft law, shall be subject to routine parliamentary procedures. 
    The Legal Committee of the Parliamentary has defended the amendments made to the draft "general amnesty", citing that the copy of the government was It includes a "very limited categories." The parliamentary committee had to add new paragraphs, depending on the terms of reference laid down by theconstitution, as some of its members said. 
    More than 10 judges participated for weeks with the political blocs and parliamentary committees to finalize a general amnesty law. 

    Haste infallible ratify 
    and after 6 days of the adoption of "amnesty General ", ratified by the presidency of the law, which the surprise of some political blocs. 
    , said MP Ali al - Badri, the head of al inside Dawa Party bloc," We used to be delayed President of theRepublic to ratify the laws prescribed by the House of Representatives, except for a general amnesty and thedismissal of defense Minister , who were lightning fast. " 
    honest infallible on the dismissal of al - Obeidi in conjunction with the adoption by the parliament , " general amnesty ". But observers have questioned the constitutionality of the last step, considering that the sacking ofexecutives do not fall within the powers of the President. This 
    included an amnesty law all convicts to death and other penalties except for 13 categories of crimes, including: the terrorist crime that gave rise to the killing or permanent disability, human trafficking and all that falls under the title of (captivity) by what is termed when takfiri terrorist groups. 
    Turning the law to the kidnappings , which originated in the death of the kidnapped or anonymity fate or cause permanent disability, and rape, and crimes of smuggling of antiquities and money laundering. 
    according to the Amnesty law, marker investigating judges and courts private law enforcement during thethirty - day period for each defendant. In the case of the investigating judges and special courts rejected theinclusion of the defendant amnesty, are entitled to a last resort an appeal to the courts discriminatory, that itmust decide on the matter within thirty days. 
    Ambiguity and irregularities unconstitutional , 
    but an official in the Judicial Council, in connection with the issues of terrorism, said the formation of committees to review verdicts court and acquired become final after ratification by the Federal Court ofCassation, especially in death penalty cases, as " the fear of the law of judicial organization", pointing out that the amnesty law "gave the powers of the judiciary Committee less degree from the Court of Cassation." And confirms judicial officer, in a statement to (run), " The amnesty law included violation of the Constitution when the text that will be in effect from the date of a vote in the House of Representatives , " noting that " the Constitution draw a clear path to the validity of any law which is to be after the presidency authentication and then published in the official Gazette , which did not last firefly law. " He criticized the judicial expert violation of "amnesty" to the Criminal Procedure Code , which states "not to release the detainee from prison only after the acquisition of the decision become final , " and wondered , saying , "How can keep the detainee in prison after being closed its case by the judiciary under the law Pardons?". With regard to the governed theissues of terrorism, the judicial official sees " the law was confusing and ambiguous , " pointing out that " thelaw does not specify the mechanism by which committees re - trials will decide under which the re - trial of the person I be applied with or relationship judicial decision?". In the same context, MP Salim Shawki, amember of the parliamentary legal committee, said "judicial committees did not release anybody until now, because of the holiday." It is expected MP Shawki, through contact with the (range) yesterday, said that " thecommittees begin to restrict amnesty covered by leaves in preparation for their release , " arguing that "critics of the amnesty may be caught in a misunderstanding of the terms of the law." And refers member bloc citizen, headed by Ammar al - Hakim, that " the amendments the government will not affect the force oflaw." 

    Allowed to return back 
    soon , which went to the citizen bloc MP Hassan Turan, the other member of the legal committee, said that " the amendments says if approved by Parliament, it can not be re - released on the old law to prison again. " 
    asserts Turan (range) that" amendments until the last day before the holiday were not has reached the legal committee , "but he corrects by saying that" parliament may approve the amendments if It is in the interest of everyone, "pointing out that" parliament has the right to reject any project is coming from the government law. " Otherwise, MP Ali al - Badri , said , "sees the political blocs, which has a deal amnesty law, would agree to government amendments, otherwise you will lose all the law if the Prime Minister has decided toappeal to the Federal Court." The attention of Member State law that "those blocks long waited for the arrival of law to the stage of voting, and they want to in any case passed whatever its content, for fear of entering the stage and the postponement of new disabled."

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Fri 22 Nov 2024, 10:34 pm