Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Welcome to the Neno's Place!

Neno's Place Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality


Neno

I can be reached by phone or text 8am-7pm cst 972-768-9772 or, once joining the board I can be reached by a (PM) Private Message.

Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Established in 2006 as a Community of Reality

Many Topics Including The Oldest Dinar Community. Copyright © 2006-2020


    MP: The Parliament is convinced to pass the law retroactively

    chouchou
    chouchou
    chouchou
    Moderator
    Moderator


    Posts : 5062
    Join date : 2012-12-20
    • Post n°1

    MP: The Parliament is convinced to pass the law retroactively Empty MP: The Parliament is convinced to pass the law retroactively

    Post by chouchou Tue 29 Jan 2013, 1:16 pm

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

    BAGHDAD / NINA / The rapporteur of the House of Representatives, the MP,
    of the Iraqiya coalition, Mohammed al-Khalidi saw that "The Federal
    Court cannot approve (not retroactive) the law of the mandate of the
    three presidencies, because it would circumvent the Constitution and the
    desire of most of the political blocs."

    He said in a statement
    to the National Iraqi News Agency / NINA /: "If the Federal Court agrees
    the Law ( not-retroactive) that will lose its importance and will be
    unconstitutional or illegal, because it is the Parliament's right to
    pass laws retroactively .

    Khalidi said: "The Parliament is
    convinced to pass the law retroactively, and no one can circumvent it
    because it is a constitutional," adding "if the three presidencies
    stayed for more than two terms, that would be a consecration of
    dictatorship"

    The media quoted informed sources in the Federal
    Court, as saying that "that the Supreme Court tends to make a decision
    to achieve the desire of the House of Representatives and at the same
    time satisfy the prime minister, that the law should not be applied
    retroactively."

    The House of Representatives passed, last
    Saturday, a law defining the mandates of the three presidencies in two
    sessions. The state of law said it is unconstitutional, saying it would
    challenge the decision in the Federal Court. / End

    [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
    • Back to top
      Current date/time is Wed 06 Nov 2024, 5:31 am