Lawyers: The hearing of the ruling for the annulment of the election results will be postponed

[size=52]Lawyers: The hearing of the ruling for the annulment of the election results will be postponed[/size]

[size=45][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
 Baghdad: Shaima Rashid

Two legal experts expected the Federal Court to postpone the verdict in the lawsuit submitted by the leader of the Al-Fateh Alliance Hadi Al-Amiri to “cancel the election results” to another day, attributing the postponement to “political” reasons or to complete the evidence.
The legal expert, Tariq Harb, considered that the Federal Court should either postpone the verdict in the lawsuit of the head of the Al-Fateh Alliance, scheduled for tomorrow, Monday, or consider it the “session” as a continuation of the previous sessions.
In an interview, Harb suggested that the ruling would not be pronounced due to the current political conditions, and the “federal” desire to take note of the case from its legal aspects, explaining that the postponement would be for a short time that would not exceed three days.
In the same context, legal expert Haider Al-Sufi went to the expectation of his colleague Harb, to postpone tomorrow's session, Monday, to scrutinize or for more time in drafting the ruling. Al-Sufi said: The Federal Court is independent and is not subject to pressure, and there is no interest for anyone to pressure it, explaining that the political parties are all with the case resolved as soon as possible.
He added that the approval of the election results is contingent on the court’s decision on the case, indicating that the federal government needs more time to examine the evidence submitted to it. Al-Sufi added that it is possible that the decision on the case may be postponed for other reasons, such as the court deems it necessary to hear the opinion of legal experts, or To inquire of the plaintiff regarding the evidence presented by him.
He pointed out that the judiciary is not in a hurry to issue its judgment in important and dangerous cases, and it is obliged to slow down in order to check the evidence and take into account the rights of the two parties to the case, "the caller and the defendant", according to what the constitution affirms, noting that it is very natural for the ratification of the election results to be delayed until a final decision is made. The case, because appeals affect the results in such cases, and it is not known the number of times of postponement according to the circumstances of the court and its need for time.
Election results will be postponed
Disclaimer: All published articles represent the opinion of its authors only[/size]
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]